Is a nice Muslim a good Muslim?

Political Islam

A follow-up on this article:

Is a Nice Muslim a Good Muslim?

Claude Salhami was ‘aghast’ at a recent newsletter-Is a Nice Muslim a Good Muslim? He replied to the newsletter with his Scourge of ‘Islam Experts’, but he missed my point.

The point of the Nice Muslim newsletter is that the doctrine of Islam is inhuman, not that Muslims always practice the Islamic doctrine at all times. A Muslim can be a fine person in dealing with a kafir when they are not practicing Islam. A summary of the Nice Muslim argument is:

  • The Koran defines the kafir, a non-Muslim. A kafir is hated and plotted against by Allah. Kafirs can be killed, tortured, crucified, raped, insulted, enslaved and deceived. Kafir is the worst word in the human language. A kafir does not have any positive attributes.
  • There is no Golden Rule in Islamic ethics. The Koran repeats 12 times that a Muslim is not the friend of a kafir.
  • Mohammed repeatedly said that it is good to deceive the kafirs, if it advances Islam.
  • Mohammed destroyed each and every kafir neighbor. It is Islam’s purpose to make all kafirs submit to Islam.
  • A Muslim can only be a true friend to a kafir by the use of the Golden Rule, a non-Islamic principle.

The conclusion is that there is no good in Islam for the kafir. Sure there are those 2.6% of the Koranic words that seem to be good, but in every case the so-called good verses are abrogated later.

Anyone who implements the doctrine of Islam is not the friend of a kafir. If they are actually a friend, it is because of the power of the Golden Rule, not Islam. There is no good in Islam for the kafir. Note that this result was reached without the use of a single verse of the Koran (no cherry picking), but uses the systemic nature of its kafir doctrine.

Mr. Salhami makes these points in his reply:

  • On many occasions Christians have acted badly and Muslims have acted well.

So? Christians and Muslims are people. You can prove anything you want by choosing the right member. He also has some remarks about Christianity. To which I reply: I only discuss Islam, not comparative religion.

  • There are good Muslims and bad Muslims and we should not confuse the two.

What is meant by ‘good’ Muslims? Do we judge by the Islam of Medina or by the Golden Rule? If we judge by Islam of Medina, then Osama bin Laden is a good Muslim. Of course, by the Golden Rule he is not so nice. Stay with the doctrine of Islam in judging Muslims. A good Muslim is one who follows Islamic doctrine, not one who is likable.

  • Mr. Salhami uses his personal experience with Muslims to learn about Islam.

This confuses cause and effect. Islam is the cause and Muslims are the effect. A nice Muslim does not prove a nice Islam. Learning from Muslims is Muslim-ology,a sociological personal endeavor. Learning about Islam from the Koran, Sira, Hadith and Sharia law is learning about Islam.

  • He criticizes my use of the coined term, kafir-Muslim.

I will grant him this criticism and thank him for it. A much better term is Golden-Rule Muslim. Muslims, like all humans, have an innate sense of the truth of the Golden Rule and use it at times. However, this is an un-Islamic act since Islam does not have a Golden Rule.

All of the nice Muslims Mr. Salhami meets in the Middle East will not teach him anything about the suffering of their kafir ancestors during the jihad invasion and the centuries of being dhimmis living under the horror of Sharia law. He won’t learn how the native civilization has been annihilated and replaced with the civilization of Islam. They will not tell him about the murder of millions of innocent Christians, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, animists and Hindus to create the Islamic civilization.

His nice Muslim friends will not instruct him in the vision, strategy and tactics of jihad to annihilate all kafir civilizations. Nor will his nice Muslim friends ever explain Islam’s dualistic ethical system, with one set of ethics for kafirs and a different set of ethics for their Muslim brothers.

Mr. Salhami is aghast at the self-taught scholars in Islam. There is a good reason for their appearance. The university- trained ‘experts’ are apologists for Islam. They are trained in denial and justification and produce the type of scholarship that allows the army to investigate Major Hasan’s jihad at Fort Hood and never refer to Islam.

The ‘experts’ give us the history of Islamic conquest and imperialism and praise it as the glorious rise of Islam. The ‘experts’ teach courses in women’s studies and ignore Sharia law and Mohammed’s treatment of women. They lecture on slavery and never mention the Muslim wholesaler who sold the slaves to the white man on the wooden ship or the Islamic slave trade in North Africa, East Africa, Europe and India. The denial goes on and on as the ‘experts’ drive our university policy. Is there a course in any American university system that is critical of Islamic political ideology? Indeed, the ‘experts’ argue that such a course would be bigotry.

It is the media ‘experts’ that give us jihad at Mumbai, India and never mention Islam. It is the ‘experts’ that give us the Official Islam that Bush and Obama talk about. Nice stuff-Official Islam. Too bad it does not exist.

So, it is no wonder that when we have such dhimmified professors, university trained ‘experts’ and media that professionals from other fields start reading the Koran, Sira and Hadith to see for themselves what the ideology actually is that drives the contradictions between current events and what we are told.

When you understand that the entire doctrine of Islam is found in Koran, Sira and Hadith, you realize that Islam is simpler than the ‘experts’ told us. All three texts have been made readable today and any disciplined person can become well informed. The ‘experts’ have failed us, and we must teach ourselves.

It is easy to be an expert. Know Mohammed and the Koran (the book he brought about). If what you say agrees with the Koran or Mohammed, then you are right. If it does not agree with Mohammed, then it is wrong, no matter who you are.

Mr. Salhami, buckle your seatbelt and prepare to be aghast again. It is a war between the university-trained dhimmi ‘experts’ and the self-taught kafir scholars who stand on the doctrine found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. We will use critical thought on the doctrine and history of political Islam.

The ‘experts’ will talk about nice Muslims, criticize Christianity and the West, while not holding Muslims responsible for their ideology. Every Muslim must be held accountable for Islamic political doctrine and its bloody history.

Bill Warner,
Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam

One thought on “Is a nice Muslim a good Muslim?”

  1. Can a good Muslim be a good American?

    This e-mail has been going around for a long time, but it is still as relevant as the Koran is to the soldiers of allah:

    Theologically – no… Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon god
    of Arabia .

    Religiously – no… Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah
    except Islam. (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)

    Scripturally – no… Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of
    Islam and the Quran.

    Geographically – no… Because his allegiance is to Me cca , to which he
    turns in prayer five times a day.

    Socially – no… Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make
    friends with Christians or Jews.

    Politically – no…. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual
    leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America ,
    the great Satan.

    Domestically – no… Because he is instructed to marry four Women and
    beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him. (Quran 4:34 )

    Intellectually – no… Because he cannot accept the American / Western (Law)
    Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes
    the Bible to be corrupt.

    Philosophically – no…. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does
    not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam
    cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or

    Spiritually – no… Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ The
    Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as
    Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran’s 99 excellent

    Therefore, after much study and deliberation… Perhaps we should be
    very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. – – – They obviously
    cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and ‘good’ Americans. Call it what you
    wish it’s still the truth.. You had better believe it. The more who
    understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future.
    The religious war is bigger than we know or understand!

    Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.


    Please don’t delete this until you send it on.

    “In God We Trust”
    United States national motto

Comments are closed.