Lots of inner struggle here. Make sure you have barf bag ready…

Tarek Fatah: “She (Aisha) could have been between 19 and 21…”

Steve Gilchrist is as ignorant as a dumpster…. In defence of Wafa Sultan,” by Joanne Hill in the National Post, but better with great comments from Jihad Watch

Ali Sina’s Coup de Grace:

“Give them the freedom to choose: that’s all I’m asking for. Give them the freedom to search, to ask, to be exposed to different sides, different values, different lifestyles.”

“I would like to remind the readers that virtually all Muslim terrorists come from a secular background.

“At one point they were just as “liberal” as Mr. Fatah is today until something happened in their lives and they turned to their faith.

“Every “moderate” Muslim is a potential terrorist.

“The belief in Islam is like a tank of gasoline. It looks innocuous, until it meets the fire.

“For a “moderate” Muslim to become a murderous jihadist, all it takes is a spark of faith.

“It is time to put an end to the charade of “moderate Islam.”

” There is no such thing as [a] moderate Muslim.

“Muslims are either jihadists or dormant jihadists – moderate, they are not.”

Thus spake Ali Sina, apostate from Islam; and he knows whereof he speaks.

And from that lapidary paragraph that should be going viral on the internet, by every possible means, all over the non-Muslim world, in a dozen languages, let’s meditate on these two lines in particular:

“The belief in Islam is like a tank of gasoline. It looks innocuous, until it meets the fire.

“For a “moderate” Muslim to become a murderous jihadist, all it takes is a spark of faith.”

Want more? Here’s more:

Was Muhammad a rapist? First check Quran 33:50-52, where “Allah” gives Muhammad permission to have sex with (i.e., rape) as many of his “right hand possessions” (non-Muslim female captives and slaves) as he wishes. Worse, Muhammad/Allah gives Muslim men the same permission (23:1-6, 70:29-30; 4:24).

Muhammad’s rape of Ayesha is inferred straightforwardly from the fact that the Hadiths states that Ayesha was 9 when Muhammad “consummated” the marriage. Ayesha herself is reported as saying this. This constitutes rape. Instead of acknowledging and rejecting these ahadith, Fatah accuses Wafa Sultan of “hate” and “Islamophobia” and totally “making” up a “story.” Fatah then pursues a preposterous apologetic line that even some Islam apologists don’t make, whereby Ayesha is supposedly 14 or 18, according to a variety of indirect inferences that ignore the direct statements in the sahih ahadith pertaining to this.

One of Fatah’s assumptions is that it is unlikely that Muhammad would rape anyone. How then does Fatah explain Muhammad’s rape of Safiya, after he had her husband tortured and executed, at the invasion of Khaybar?

“The Muslims were…commanded to fight not only those who fought against them but also those who did not, in order to establish the word of Allah”

In traditional Islamic theology there is the idea that the teaching on jihad was revealed in stages: first, tolerance; then, defensive warfare; then, offensive warfare to establish Sharia over the world. Many, many Islamic authorities, ancient and modern, teach this — and it belies the soothing Religion of Peaceâ„¢ lies and half-truths that Islamic apologists peddle so successfully in Western countries. Here is yet another Islamic authority teaching the same thing. “This is an article from online Arabic magazine Moheet, which has offices in Egypt and the UAE.” “Moheet: ‘The Purpose of Jihad Is to Establish the Word of Allah,'” from Translating Jihad, March 18/Jihad Watch

What the Koran really says about jihad: Koranic statistics

Koran stats thanks to Islamization Watch

Words of: Allah 17% – Muhammad 83%

Reasons to go to hell: moral failings 6% – questioning Muhammad 94%

References to jihad: related to war 97% – inner struggle 3%

Featured prominently is Muhammad and submission to his word but also the waging of holy war or jihad.

Got that?

“Featured prominently: Muhammad and submission to his words, but also the waging of holy war or jihad.”

The Koran emphasizes submission (enslavement) and dual ethics (one rule for Moslems and another for kafirs who are disgusting vermin).

The Koran calls Moslems to fight, kill and enslave the vermin, thus bringing them under their control as slave-masters and forcing the kafirs to submit as slaves.

The purpose of the Koran, thus is revealed as a troop motivator.

2 thoughts on “"Jihad…"”

  1. Muslims are lying sacks of donkey dung.

    “Allah” will not hold them accountable for lying when it is beneficial to the cause of Islam – this is what shitslam is about.

  2. We’d better shake off this WWII guilt about the Japanese, the guilt we carry about slavery. Our nation has become paralyzed by the left who use these past issues against our will to defend ourselves. WAKE UP AMERICA! We are a Constitutional Republic and should bend to no religion. No religion may implement laws that are counter to those of the land or our Constitution.

Comments are closed.