12 thoughts on “Son of Hamas Leader, Mosab Hassan Yousef, Calls For Banning The Koran”

  1. One side of me says yes that book of creepiness should be banned. But the other side of me says that if it is then only the muslims will know about it and then they can carry on their agenda with a group of people in complete ignorance about what islam is all about.

    How about banning muslim immigration, decategorize islam as a religion, classify ALL the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) front groups including the MB as a terrorist organization and kick them out of our media, schools, lobby in DC and elsewhere, etc?

    1. Look at it this way:

      Hitlers “Mein Kampf” is banned in some countries because it is a manual of warfare that claims genocide against the Jews is somehow justified.

      Hitler demonized and exterminated millions of Jews because they didn’t fit into his picture of world domination. Today, once again, 1.5 billion Muslims and their Western enablers scream for the death of Jews and for Israel to be wiped out. This needs to be stopped before it happens, not afterwards.

      Naturally, in the age of information technology nothing can be banned, neither should it be. But ‘Mein Kampf’ is banned anyhow, (in some European countries) and denial of the Holocaust is also punishable because it comes with fomenting hatred against Jews and justifications to commit genocide all over again.

      Now, Wilders concept, with which I agree, is to ban the Koran just like Hitlers dirty book is banned, and while I cringe at the thought of censorship altogether, a ban of the Koran is absolutely necessary as long as Christians are not allowed to bring their holy books to Arabia, as long as there is no reciprocity to build churches or synagogues in Mohammedan countries, etc, etc.

      I look at it from an aspect of reciprocity.

      And since we know that there will never be any reciprocity anyhow, its just one way to dig our heels in, to make it harder, if not impossible for Mohammedans to propagate their hateful ideology in the dar-ul harb, in the countries that are -not yet- conquered by the armies of Islam.

      Tell me what you think…?

  2. how can you people even begin to compare the holy book with that of hitlers. it is not the book that is the problem it is those uneducated people that do not understand the real meaning of the koran or what it is protraying. no where in the koran does it say to strap a bomb to yourself and blow up people. In islam suicide for any reason is strictly forbidin and also the killing of any one person unless in imdiate danger by the person. the islamic law states that no one person can kill another human life just because of the governments poor judgements or just pure evil actions to kill or repress you or your fellow persons, that does not justify your actions of straping a bomb and killing those that do not deserve it. people the book is not the problem as it is the people who read it and twist the words for their own purpose that are the problem. please educate yourself and do not be ignorant of the truth.

  3. maseeh March 24, 2010 at 8:24 am

    …”it is not the book that is the problem it is those uneducated people that do not understand the real meaning of the koran or what it is protraying.”…

    T’is not!
    There are tooo many educated imans who keep getting it wrong then.

    They are the ones who are telling those uneducated muslims that martyrdom by suicide is ‘halal’. 72 virgins and all that.

    Look in the quran yourself. Do some reading of that book in your own language. Then you will realise that islam is telling you and your people to behave in this way. Don’t be so disingenuous!

  4. “no where in the koran does it say to strap a bomb to yourself and blow up people”

    No, it says to strike off their heads and maim them in every limb, among other things. That’s enough for openers – Mo didn’t have semtex back then.

  5. How can any sane person call the koran a holy book. The koran has extractions from the Torah and the Bible. That does not make it a holy book. The rest of the book of evil, is filled with one man’s perception of how he would like his subjects to live in obedience to him. In other words, besides the extracts, the rest of what is written in the koran, is a load of shit.

  6. ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION…it is a system for world domination. The Bush family connection with Nazis and Obama’s Muslim supremacist ideals equal an Islamo-Nazi continuation of what BOTH Obama and Bush expouse to this day…a “NEW WORLD ORDER’:
    http://www.nmatv.com/video/618/What-Islam-Is-Not
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/816232/posts
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
    http://www.flix.co.il/tapuz/showVideo.asp?m=2449529

  7. 009:003-029 The verse 9:5 does not encourage muslims to attack those who associate partners to God, but to attack those who have violated the peace treaty and killed and terrorized people because of their belief and way of life.

    According to verses 9:5 and 9:11, the aggressive party has two ways to stop the war: reinstate the treaty for peace (silm), which is limited in scope; or accept the system of peace and submission to God (islam), which is comprehensive in scope; it includes observation of sala and purification through sharing one’s blessings. These two verses refer to the second alternative. When, accepting islam (system of peace and submission) as the second equally acceptable alternative and when the first alternative involves only making a temporary peace, then none can argue for coercion in promoting the Din.

    The Quran does not promote war; but encourages us to stand against aggressors on the side of peace and justice. War is permitted only for self-defense (See 2:190,192,193,256; 4:91; 5:32; 8:19; 60:7-9). We are encouraged to work hard to establish peace (47:35; 8:56-61; 2:208). The Quranic precept promoting peace and justice is so fundamental that peace treaty with the enemy is preferred to religious ties (8:72).

    Please note that the context of the verse is about the War of Hunain, which was provoked by the enemy. The verse 9:29 is mistranslated by almost every translator.

    Furthermore, note that we suggest “reparation”, which is the legal word for compensation for damages done by the aggressing party during the war, instead of Arabic word jizya. The meaning of jizya has been distorted as a perpetual tax on non-Muslims, which was invented long after Muhammad to further the imperialistic agenda of Sultans or Kings. The origin of the word that I translated as Compensation is JaZaYa, which simply means compensation, not tax. Because of their aggression and initiation of a war against muslims and their allies, after the war, the allied community should require their enemies to compensate for the damage they inflicted on the peaceful community. Various derivatives of this word are used in the Quran frequently, and they are translated as “compensation” for a particular deed.

    Unfortunately, the distortion in the meaning of the verse above and the practice of collecting a special tax from Christians and Jews, contradict the basic principle of the Quran that there should not be compulsion in religion and there should be freedom of belief and expression (2:256; 4:90; 4:140; 10:99; 18:29; 88:21,22). Since taxation based on religion creates financial duress on people to convert to the privileged religion, it violates this important Quranic principle. Dividing a population that united under a social contract (constitution) into privileged groups based on their religion contradicts many principles of the Quran, including justice, peace, and brotherhood/sisterhood of all humanity. See 2:256. For a comparative discussion on this verse, see the Sample Comparison section under the title, Why a Reformist Translation, in the Introduction.

    Moral rules involving retaliation can be classified under several titles:

    * The Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
    * The Silver Rule: Do not do unto others what you would not have them do unto you.
    * The Gold-plated Brazen Rule: Do unto others as they do unto you; and occasionally forgive them.
    * The Brazen Rule: Do unto others as they do unto you.
    * The Iron Rule: Do unto others as you like, before they do it unto you.

    Empirical studies on groups have shown that the gold-plated brazen rule is the most efficient in reducing the negative behavior in a community abiding by the rule, since the rule has both deterrence and guiding components. The Golden rule, on the other hand, does not correspond to the reality of human nature; it rewards those who wish to take advantage of the other party’s niceness. Therefore, though the golden rule is the most popular rule in the lips of people, but it is the least used rule in world affairs. It might have some merits in small groups with intimate relations; but we do not have evidence for that.

    The Quran is book of reality, and its instructions involving social issues consider the side effects of freedom. Thus, the Quran recommends us to employ the gold-plated brazen rule. “If the enemy inclines toward peace, do you also incline toward peace.” (8:61; 4:90; 41:34). Other verses encouraging forgiveness and patience in the practice of retaliation (2:178; 16:126, etc.), makes the Quranic rule a “Gold plated Brazen Rule,” the most efficient rule in promoting goodness and discouraging crimes.

    Sunni and Shiite mushriks inherited many vicious laws and instructions of violence through hadith books, of which scholars trace their roots to Jewish Rabies and Christian priests who supposedly converted to Islam. Here are some samples of terrifying and bloody instructions found in The Old Testament. We recommend the reader to study them in their context:

    “The Lord said to Moses: ‘Take the blasphemer outside the camp. All those who heard him are to lay their hands on his head, and the entire assembly is to stone him. Say to the Israelites: If anyone curses his God, he will be held responsible; anyone who blasphemes the name of the Lord must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death…. Then Moses spoke to the Israelites, and they took the blasphemer outside the camp and stoned him. The Israelites did as the Lord commanded Moses.” (Leviticus 24:13-16).

    “Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man. But save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.” (Numbers 31:18).

    “And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword” (Joshua 6:21).

    “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass” (1 Samuel 15:3).

    “And as David returned from the slaughter of the Philistine, Abner took him, and brought him before Saul with the head of the Philistine in his hand” (1 Samuel 17:57).

    “Thus the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword, and slaughter, and destruction, and did what they would unto those that hated them” (Esther 9:5).

    “Why do the wicked prosper and the treacherous all live at ease?… But you know me, Lord, you see me; you test my devotion to you. Drag them away like sheep to the shambles; set them apart for the day of slaughter” (Jeremiah 12:1-3).

    “A curse on all who are slack in doing the Lord’s work! A curse on all who withhold their swords from bloodshed!” (Jeremiah 48:10).

    Chapter 20 of LEVITICUS contains a list of very severe punishments for various sins. For instance, cursing one’s own father of mother would prompt death penalty. A man marrying a woman together with her daughter must be burned in the fire. Homosexual men must be put to death. Those who commit bestiality, must be put to death together with the animals. And many more death, burning penalties.

    1. Bismillah al rahman al rahim, Ronald (McDonald?)

      Oh great scholar of Islam, welcome on this humble site! May Allah bless you and all the reforms you are planning for his religion!

      May allah bless you for explaining his religion and translating the verses correctly! Please let us know the correct translation of the verses you posted so we can understand them better!

      The Quran does not promote war; but encourages us to stand against aggressors on the side of peace and justice. War is permitted only for self-defense (See 2:190,192,193,256; 4:91; 5:32; 8:19; 60:7-9). We are encouraged to work hard to establish peace (47:35; 8:56-61; 2:208). The Quranic precept promoting peace and justice is so fundamental that peace treaty with the enemy is preferred to religious ties (8:72).

      Please note that the context of the verse is about the War of Hunain, which was provoked by the enemy. The verse 9:29 is mistranslated by almost every translator.

      May allah bless you for translating it correctly to the ignorant kaffirs who are reading this website, Mullah Ronald.

      Unfortunately, there is not enough time to attend to all the statements and claims you made, so let me ask you for now only this:

      Where in the Koran or in the hadith is there any reference or mention of the Golden Rule or any of the others which you have so intelligently advised us of?

      You claim that:

      “Sunni and Shiite mushriks inherited many vicious laws and instructions of violence through hadith books…”

      which gives me the impression that you are neither Sunni or Shiite. Please explain which new sect of Islam you belong to, if you don’t mind.

      Your claim that “The Quran does not promote war” is blasphemous because of the command to fight unbelievers until “religion is all for Allah” (8:39)

      So what kind of Muslim are you? A fake Muslim or one who created a new sect?

  8. Ronald,

    There is absolutely NO COMPARISON between the God of the Bible and the god of your cult. Here’s why:

    1. Out of ALL the peoples of the world, our God chose the Hebrews to convey His message to mankind. This fact alone nullifies any claims the Arabs may have concerning a supposed prophetic role.
    2. Out of ALL the Hebrews, our God chose a handful of Hebrew men for the office of prophet throughout a 1500 year period. Again this renders your cult leader’s proclamation void.
    3. Our God is a holy God and He demands Holiness for His people. He alone decides who lives and who dies. As far as His people were concerned, He had and still has zero tolerance for sin. Hence, either your blood or the blood of Christ.
    4. Your cult fails the test of credibility in every respect. It has No foundations, and by your cult leader’s own admission: “Islam was once strange and will end strange just as it started!”

    Instead of attempting to polish your cult’s image by twisting facts, why don’t you do yourself a favor and emulate you cult leader’s life. Show us what righteousness is all about by his actions.

  9. Ronald,
    The Quran actually specifies the “Iron Rule”, And this is what you explicitly state in your first paragraph (albeit unintentionally) . You are playing a game of definition – effectively you have just stated that non-muslims are aggressors against peace and justice – and this is used to justify muslim behavior in the entire article. All non-muslims would disagree with you and your viewpoint , which you have stated is integral within the Quran, is defined as criminal activity within any legal system. I suspect that Ronald is not your name, and that you are the moron john once again trying to convince people that red is green and that islam is not evil. As regards the old testament, not only was mohammed a rapist and child molester, but he basically borrowed extensively from the old testament. The observation that the Jewish folk do not behave in the barbaric manner prescribed in the Old Testament, but that muslims regularly exceed the limits of barbarity on an almost daily basis, leads one to conclude that the Jewish folks were sufficiently bright to throw the extreme parts of the OT away while the muslims are simply mindless dolts. You have also not supported your outlandish claim that Christian and Jewish priests deliberately converted to islam to smear islam – NO SUCH EVIDENCE EXISTS – except perhaps in your feeble mind. To the each of the “texts” produced by Ronald can be found an equivalent with the Quran – this is no surprise since mohammed virtually plagarised some parts of the OT. The fact that men an women are murdered on a daily basis due to perceived violation of islamic law demonstrates just how dangerous islam and its adherents are.

    Finally, it is not clear why you have not quoted references to the “academic studies” you refer to. I would argue that the “optimal group survival strategy” you refer to the “gold-plated brazen” rule is in fact your own invention. It appears to be based on the most primitive understanding of human social interaction etc. This is also no surprise since your entire contribution is an excuse for islam based upon poor foundations of logic and moral values.

    In short you have just wasted 5 minutes of peoples time with your twaddle john. go annoy a donkey.

Comments are closed.