Ali Sina's Challenge

Ali Sina’s challenge has been around for a long time. His debates with Muslims are legendary. Those who are new to this game are encouraged to read and learn from it because it always comes in handy to be informed.


I receive many emails from angry Muslims, who sometimes beg me, and sometimes order me to remove this site. I consider both, pleading and bullying, signs of psychopathology. Argumentum ad baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam are both logical fallacies.

If you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically. Not only will I remove the site, I will publicly announce that Islam is a true religion. I will also pay

$50,000 U.S. dollars

to anyone who can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made against Muhammad.I accuse Muhammad of being:

a narcissist a misogynist a rapist
a pedophile a lecher a  torturer
a mass murderer a cult leader an assassin
a terrorist a mad man a looter

I have debated with many Muslims. Their defense of Islam can be summarized in two categories:

a-      Denial of the authenticity of Islamic sources that report the stories of crimes of Muhammad (example: debate with Edip Yukssel, a leader of the Submitters)

b-     Moral relativism and situational ethics, e.g., “In those days,  pedophilia, assassination, rape, raid, pillage, massacre and lying, were common practices, so Muhammad is innocent because he did what everyone else was doing.”  Muslims even go as far as to question the legitimacy of the Golden Rule to claim I do not have any basis to condemn Muhammad. In other words, who can say what is good and what is evil? That is up to the messenger of God to decide. (Example: debate with Yamin Zakaria)

These are the main two arguments that Muslims present in defense of Islam. Any rational person can see they are logical fallacies.

These charges are irrefutable. You simply can’t disprove them because they are reported in Islamic sources and as such they are as good as confession. You can’t acquit a criminal after he has confessed, unless you plead insanity, which is my point.

Muslims often ask: “Who will judge whether or not an attempt to disprove your accusations against Muhammad and Islam, was successful?”   The readers will be the jury. It is not difficult to see which side is right once both arguments are presented without one side fearing the other. I will publish the debates in this site.  My opponents are also encouraged to publish them in any Islamic site.  Please note that I will not accept face to face debates.  The debates must be in writing.

Edit 2007/07/29

The above challenge was issued in 2001 and it hasn’t been met yet. See the debates I had with Muslims.  Also see the pathetic attempt of some Muslims trying to refute me here , here, hereand here.  Is that all the Muslim world can offer?  Where are the scholars of Islam?  Why such an important task is left to a bunch of amateurs who actually do more damage to Islam?  Isn’t it time that the real scholars come forth and refute my charges?

The truth is that several of the people that debated me were real scholars, such as the eminent Pakistani scholar Mr. Javed Ahmed Ghamidi and his disciple Dr. Khalid Zaheer. This debate is a must read and is available for download. Dr. Zaheer is a learned man, a moderate Muslim  and a good human being. I have utmost respect for him.

As of this date (2007), I will no longer debate with people who want to debate anonymously. I only debate with reputable scholars. I made this decision because often, Muslims moved by their faith and zealotry, but with little knowledge of Islam, challenge me to debate. They rehash the same tried and refuted arguments that bore everyone and disappear. Then, other Muslims, either accuse me of fabricating those debates or pooh-pooh my opponents for not being scholars.

As of this day, I am also doubling the reward. If you are not a reputable scholar, you can still win the prize. All you have to do is persuade a scholar to debate with me. If he (she) disproves my charges or can prove that Muhammad was a prophet of God, both you and he (she) will be rewarded $50,000 dollars each. This is to encourage you to write to your admired scholar and convince them that Islam is in danger and that it is their duty to defend it. Once you write to invite someone, please CC a copy to us for announcing the invitation.  Our email is faithfreedom2 (at)

Yes, Islam is in grave danger. Never, since its inception, Islam has faced a threat as serious as this. Today, millions of ex-Muslims are questioning the claimed truth of Islam, can make their criticisms heard worldwide, and unlike before, not fear for their lives.  As long as these questions are not answered, this trend is only bound to continue, until the trickle becomes a torrent and the fall of Islam becomes obvious.  In the past, the critics of Islam briefly shined like lamps in darkness, only to be put out by winds of persecution. What is happening today can be likened to the break of the dawn.  Darkness has no chance in front of this much light.  Muslims are waking up and leaving Islam like never before. A spiritual and intellectual revolution is underway.  This is the century of enlightenment of the benighted Muslims. The giant is finally awakening.  The days of Islam are numbered.  This demon of hate and ignorance will be slain by the hands of its own primary victims.  The unity of mankind and the world peace are around the corner.

Please advertise this challenge. Every Muslim must see it.  This is like throwing water on their fire. Nothing will dampen their zeal more than the realization that among a billion Muslims there is not a single scholar who can prove the wild claims of Muhammad, nor acquit him of these grave charges. This unmet challenge has a sobering effect on them.  They can make any excuse, such as, I am not worth their response, that there have been greater men than me who opposed Islam, or that I have been refuted already, but they will not be able to fool themselves.  The more this challenge is circulated, the more Muslims will be forced to remain silent and doubt Islam.  Do not undermine the psychological effect of this impossible challenge.


Ali Sina

4 thoughts on “Ali Sina's Challenge”

  1. ?You simply can’t disprove them because they are reported in Islamic sources and as such they are as good as confession.

    Unless the confession was under duress. Not likely though – the victims of Muhammed were under duress until they were beheaded.

  2. i wish you the best with your truthfully discusion and arguiment, i think you are going to be waiting for a long time to have some one have the courage to sit and talk with you, they are in denial and confusion and brain wash and they cant prove other wise . good luck and iwill be waiting with you to hear it.

  3. It does not suprise me that there was such a person as Muhamad. What is shocking is that there are 1.35 billion that actually believe in this.
    It is really amazing that in 2010 we have such a large part of the planet still holding on to the dark ages.

  4. Muhammad was a terrorist to the bitter end. Tabari IX:166 “The Prophet ordered the expedition of Usamah, but it did not go well because of his illness and because two other Arabs had proclaimed themselves prophets and renounced his authority. The Prophet’s head was wrapped around because of the pain.”
    Superstitious, and a believer in occult spells, Muhammad tried to cure himself by going to a magic spring. When that proved insufficient, he blew knots out of a tangle, something that sorcerers practiced as part of their black arts. Desperate, he tried praying to Allah, but needless to say, he only got sicker. Allah had never answered prayers to keep folks alive, only to kill them.

Comments are closed.