Afghanistan, “courageous restraint” and guns without bullets

U.S. military unit in Afghanistan ordered to patrol with unloaded weapons

Chasing the “hearts & minds of Muslim people”  instead of roasting our sworn enemies.  Why not? It’s a Religion of Peaceâ„¢!

American Soldiers in Afghanistan Ordered to Patrol With Their Weapons Unloaded…

Atlas Shrugs: Bring them home.

Obama is getting our boys killed ……….. why, so they can’t come home and protest the citizenry?

“Fighting a War without Bullets?,” by Chris Carter in Human Events, May 23/Jihad Watch

Commanders have ordered a U.S. military unit in Afghanistan to patrol with unloaded weapons, according to a source in Afghanistan.

Its all about “balance” said Lieutenant Commander Iain Baxter, a spokesman for NATO’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in a statement to HUMAN EVENTS.

Good thing American troops didn’t seek such “balance” against the Nazis in World War II.

Praise from His Overlords: Islamic Supremacist Universal Caliphate Group, OIC, Lauds Obama’s Submission to islam

You Can’t Make This Stuff Up

[Flopping Aces]

As Congress labored furiously to ensure that women have equal access to federal bathrooms, insurgents in Afghanistan this month launched a series of bold strikes on U.S. and NATO bases in Afghanistan. The Potty Parity Act is proceeding apace.

The Obama administration response to the upsurge in violence in Afghanistan? It launched an investigation into allegations that a number of American soldiers were responsible for the “unlawful deaths” of at least three Afghan civilians. This, despite the recent unanimous acquittal of three heroic Navy SEALS who were swiftly exonerated by a jury after being accused of, gasp, slapping one of the most dangerous terrorist detainees in the world. Who, by the way, the SEALS heroically captured. Thank-you, Navy SEALS. There is no update yet on the terrorist’s hurt lip.

As our young men are fighting and dying in Afghanistan, our current elected officials remain hard at work. Their most recent work product includes a proposal for a new medal to reward our troops for “courageous restraint.” Have you got that? A medal for not killing the enemy. Of course most of these medals would, of necessity, be awarded posthumously.

Maybe by the time the first new medal is awarded, the “enemy” will actually be defined. The only concrete message so far from Washington, via Attorney General Eric Holder, is that the enemy is NOT radical Islamic terrorists. Whew! Read the rest of this entry »

7 thoughts on “Afghanistan, “courageous restraint” and guns without bullets”

  1. Does anyone realize the conspiracy going on with Obama sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan?

    Is he sending them over there with their own personal body bags?
    It is just my theory but I think he wants to rid the U.S. of its military might by getting them all killed.
    First, and foremost, they have to read battlefield Miranda Rights.
    Miranda Rights in a foreign land?
    Then he tries a new tactic. Let’s send them out on patrols with no bullet in their chambers and “safety on”. Between reading their Miranda Rights and trying to load their chambers that should give the enemy plenty of time to decapitate them.

  2. They call this an ideological war. If we have to send our soldiers to an ideological war, then at least study the ideology of the enemy!
    I’m thinking along the lines of Al-Kidya here. Can’t help thinking that my UK Gov’t is trying to get rid of the men we have left who did not swap their spines for bananas, unlike the Gov’t who sent them out there!

  3. sabotage!
    One thing I don’t get, it’s how militar stuff agree to all of this.
    People say Obama this or Obama that but don’t pay atention to the amount of people involved: H. Clinton. Biden, J. Jones, G. Petraus, A Millen….
    And what about Charles Bolden (NASA Administrator )? Why does he accept to embarrass himself, NASA and the USA?
    ….and all the security agencies stuff, how do they accept the new policy that forbids mentioning jihad or islam?
    Not to talk of juridical, Police or any other persons which execute this weird policy.
    From the top to the bottom, nobody open his mouth, nobody resign. Everybody just perform as is told…..

  4. I’m sure the secret service bodyguards surrounding Obama exercise similar “courageous restraint”…

  5. If its that safe to walk around Afganistan then Lieutenant Commander Iain Baxter and a few other generals should go on patrol with the boys that would make wonderful PR. What about Mr Obama paying the boys a visit, and he should go walking around the streets of Helmand with bodyguards with no bullets, why not? The peace loving Muzoes would welcome a brother with open alms!

Comments are closed.