Obama's Ayatollah & Arafarts Wife

President Obama’s Ayatollah Explains Islam to the Muslims

By Barry Rubin

1. Should U.S. strategy be to make a theological judgment about the relationship of Jihad and Islam, deciding what is the “proper” Muslim stance?

2. Should U.S. strategy be to declare that there is a war only with al-Qaida and not with terrorism or anyone else? Read it all>>>

Arafat’s wife: I always hated Israelis anyway

“I hate the Israelis,” Yediot quotes Mrs Arafat as saying. “I oppose normalisation with them. Israeli women have attempted to make contact with me and I rejected them.  “I am giving an unequivocal message to all Israeli women proposing help for our institutions: you are responsible for the problems our children have. How do you dare to offer donations?”

Sheik yer’mami advises: give back the 2 billion dollars that Arafart-bastard stole!

Concentration camps needed:

Hamas-bastards on board  Gaza-bound ships intend to ‘portray Israel as occupier’

IDF officials expressed concerns that many of the activists are actually terrorists attempting to transfer arms to Hamas.

Free Gaza organizers say they are on schedule despite Cyprus’ refusal to allow them into its waters. ‘People of Gaza are in concentration camp, we will also be placed in one if detained,’ leader says/Y-net news

Sheik  recommends the Russian treatment. Or, alternatively:

1. Arrest everyone on all the boats and hold them until Gilad Shalit is released.

2. Do not allow them access to the Red Cross or anyone else until Gilad Shalit has the same rights.

3. Confiscate all goods on the ships and distribute them to the former residents of Gush Katif and Sderot.

4. Sink the ships.

Behind the Headlines: The Israeli humanitarian lifeline to Gaza

Despite attacks by Hamas, Israel maintains an ongoing humanitarian corridor for the transfer of food and humanitarian supplies to Gaza, used by internationally recognized organizations including the United Nations and the Red Cross.   More

2 thoughts on “Obama's Ayatollah & Arafarts Wife”

  1. Quote: “Nor does President Obama see this challenge as a fight against jihadists. Describing terrorists in this way, using the legitimate term `jihad,’ which means to purify oneself or to wage a holy struggle for a moral goal, risks giving these murderers the religious legitimacy they desperately seek but in no way deserve. Worse, it risks reinforcing the idea that the United States is somehow at war with Islam itself. And this is why President Obama has confronted this perception directly and forcefully in its speeches to Muslim audiences, declaring that America is not and never will be at war with Islam.”

    We could see this statement as our Taqqiya in operation – waging war against the Taleban, who are the embodiment of Islam at its purest, while saying we are not.

  2. One of the great advantages of a democracy at war, is that like every democracy, it has a multiplicity of voices.

    It is so damned confusing for honest-to-goodness dictators, to know what is the true intent of their enemy ( Generally a democracy itself does not know, until it does). Therefore sooner or later, they end up misinterpreting some statement, or taking at face value, some statement that was meant for some other policy source in the democracy. Its so damned confusing.

Comments are closed.