Israel: “Samson Option”: choice in absence of choice?

Showing weakness and stupidity, the West encourages the Middle East predators, promotes the collapse of moderate Arab regimes and throws Israel into a dilemma: the Holocaust or the “Samson option”

By Alexander Maistrovoy/Canada Free Press

“When people speak about human rights, everyone has in mind his own ones”, a German scientist and publicist Wilhelm Schwebel wrote. His words perfectly reflect the issue of “breaking” the Gaza blockade. These actions are as related to human rights as Josef Stalin’s “fight for peace”.

Other offerings:

“Obama Most Radical US President ever” states prestigious Harvard Phd

Dr. Richard L. Rubinstein, Yale fellow, “Distinguished Professor of the Year”, and Harvard Phd, states that president Obama’s intention is to “correct the historical mistake of the creation of the state of Israel.” Dr. Rubenstein states that president Obama due to his family heritage is extremely pro Muslim – to the point of “wanting to see the destruction of Israel.”

Till now not a single person has died of hunger in Gaza . They die in the other parts of the world, like Kirghizia , but nobody cares about it. The rights of Palestinians are above the rights of Uzbek people. As well as the Sudanese Christians, Iraqi Kurds, Boers in Southern Africa, “Ahmadyya” in Pakistan and Baha’is in Iran. Palestinians are the high caste of mankind because fortunately they are up against Israel , and the international community has its own rights and interests in this conflict.

What are they? Interests of all the players are very clear except for the West.

The goal of Iran is to strengthen its base on the Mediterranean Sea coast to escalate the confrontation with Israel and moderate Sunni Arab regimes, and at the same time to distract the world attention from its nuclear program.

The goal of Turkish Justice and Development Party led by Erdogan is to get points before the elections, make Turkey the leader of the Sunni world and to revive the national ambitions lost with the fall of the Ottoman Empire .

Russia is supporting Iran and Turkey in an attempt to restore the previous Soviet influence, push the US out of the region, and recover the lost imperial greatness.
The aims of these powers are completely contrary to the aims of the other two leading players in the region: Israel and the moderate Arab regimes.

The goal of Israel is to provide its safety by weakening HAMAS and depriving it of its life support: weaponry, rockets and building materials to fortify smuggling and transportation tunnels and defensive bunkers.

Arabs fear the Iranian Shiites. Nor do they want Turkey

The goal of the moderate Arab regimes coincides with that of Israel . Arabs fear the Iranian Shiites. Nor do they want Turkey , which they dislike and fear too, to raise its role in the Middle East . Least of all they are interested in strengthening the Palestinian enclave where the Iranians and Turks will rule. First of all it concerns the Mubarak regime that fears the Muslim Brotherhood’s (of which Palestinian HAMAS is an offshoot) popularity.

Theoretically both Israel and the Arab regimes are allies of the West. So it would be right to assume that the West will protect them from regional predators. Alas! Common sense and political expediency do not work. Why? There are two reasons: irreparable losses of spiritual and cultural values by once the greatest world civilization and banal political cowardice.

The radical left and liberal part of the Western elite has voluntary deprived itself of its own heritage, values and ideals. It has refused itself the right to exist, reconciled to the secondary role and even recognized its own uselessness.

“Alliance of Civilizations” of Zapatero and Obama is nothing else but accepting voluntary the status of dhimmitude

The supposed “Alliance of Civilizations ” of Zapatero and Obama is nothing else but accepting voluntary the status of dhimmitude, invitation of an alien strong, dominant, and aggressive civilization to take the place of their own bankrupt and degrading one. Obama’s bows to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia , a mosque in the place of WTC, kÅ«fÄ«yä on Zapatero’s neck, the Libyan terrorist who had blown up the plane over Lockerbie released “for health reasons” – all are the displays of this outlook. As Israel is the main irritant to Muslims, it loses its right to exist.

Zapatero recognizes the idea almost openly, Obama does it less obviously, but the essence does not change. His recent demands of Israel to open its nuclear program for IAEA oversight and to remove Gaza ’s blockade are more eloquent than any other words.

The other part of the Western political elite, European right and social-democrats, don’t accept this attitude. However, they don’t have any outlook at all. Their only goal is to keep their power up to the following elections and not to “rock the boat”.

The ideology of surviving at all costs leads to the policy of appeasement. Sarkozy (“Disproportionate application of force” by Israel ) and Kouchner (“Recognize Palestinian state before the agreement between Israel and the PA is signed”); Brown (“Labourites have a lot in common with Muslims”) and Miliband (“More respect” to Muslims), Baroness Ashton (The blockade is “unacceptable and politically counterproductive”) and Berlusconi kissing the hands of Muammar Kaddafi are certainly not anti-Semitic.

Some of them are even Jews. They have nothing against Israel , as it is. They have little concern for the simple fact that the Muslim “sea” floods their own house washing away its foundations. So what use to speak about Israel , Mubarak and the Hashemite dynasty? Why to speak at all, if it is so comfortable to be silent? Especially, if there are big business, EU officials, “Greens” and anti-globalists, “Human Rights Watch” and their own cultural elite to resist? So they meekly follow the “Alliance of Civilizations”.

The more timorous is the policy of the West, the more aggressive Ahmadinejad and Erdogan become. The USA and Western Europe encourage these hysterical politicians, and their wild behavior can lead to uncontrollable consequences.

Fall of moderate Arab regimes in Egypt , Jordan and the Persian Gulf states, Israel will be backed into a corner

If the situation does not change (that is extremely improbable), we will witness a two-act drama. The first act will be the fall of moderate Arab regimes in Egypt , Jordan and the Persian Gulf states. If it happens, the second act will follow. Israel will be backed into a corner, surrounded by uncontrollable mad regimes. It will face the total Islamic hysteria. It will see how the circle of its enemies such as Turkey , Syria , Iran and their puppets in Lebanon and Gaza unite with “revolutionary” Muslim brothers in Egypt and Jordan .

It will see the silent indifference of the West at best and shouts of triumph and jeering at worst. The next Holocaust will cease to be an abstraction and become a reality.
Israel will be left with only two options: to die without a fight or to be lost, having destroyed the enemies. The option of falling victim to genocide or the “Option of Samson”.  Zapatero and Obama believe that Israel will choose the first one. Considering the tragic and painful history of Jews, from Maccabeus and Jerusalem’s zealots to the Warsaw ghetto and the Six-Day War, I would not hurry up with conclusions. And in this case there will be no outside observers…

8 thoughts on “Israel: “Samson Option”: choice in absence of choice?”

  1. The Obama shahada in Cairo 2009

    He made a point of knowing his shahada as an integral part of himself, didn’t he? Why did he offer this performance as a token to the Arab muslim world?

    Only to show off? Nooo. “My muslim faith”, remember? To show them that “I’m a muslim and I am with you”? Or, even “I’m not an American. I’m first of all, a muslim and I am with you, and together we will work for the Ummah, against Israel, against the US. For a United Islam Nation!”?

    The caliphate when?

    Seeing what has happened so far, hearing Obama’s statement about tying the US to the OIC is really remarkable! Video published Sep 27 2009.

    “Continuing on with the speech he delivered, we heard Mr. Obama express how, “we are moving forward to partner with the OIC”.

    The question is, who is the OIC?

    The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is the second largest inter-governmental organization after the United Nations which has membership of 57 states spread over four continents. The Organization is the collective voice of the Muslim world and ensuring to safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony among various people of the world. [ 2 ]”

  2. The Cairo declaration of 1990

    The Cairo declaration of 1990 is the Sharia version of “human rights”. A poor copy of The Universal Human Rights Declaration of 1948. Like they made a poor copy from the Bible, they had to copy the Human rights Declaration, so as to make confusions when speaking about “human rights”.

    Why, for instance, does the sharia rights declaration state the “right to seek asylum”?

    Why, in a – perfect world – a sharia community, would it be necessary to seek asylum at all – in a non sharia community?

    “Article 12
    Every man shall have the right, within the framework of Shari’a, to free movement and to select his place of residence whether inside or outside his country and if persecuted, is entitled to seek asylum in another country. The country of refuge shall ensure his protection until he reaches safety, unless asylum is motivated by an act which Shari’a regards as a crime.”,ARAB,,,3ae6b3822c,0.html

    “According to the words expressed on the OIC website they claim to be the collective voice of the Muslim world; a voice according to the Cairo Declaration where rights and freedoms are stipulated under strict Islamic law.”

  3. Well Rubenstein, why have you let Harvard be overrun by Muslims and liberals who HATE Israel and HATE America? Have you ever spoken to Kagan about the Muslim threat? Even when she was bought by the Muslims with their chair and institute funding. It is so blatantly evil. I know you are just one guy, so am I. I hope you use your influence to help stop the West’s destruction.We need all the truthful men to stand and speak up.

  4. * As Israel is the main irritant to Muslims, it loses its right to exist.

    One more reason why Israel is so necessary.

  5. I disagree with the premise that Israel is surrounded.

    From the Muslim point of view, it is Israel that has surrounded them. They are obsessed by Israel’s existence. No politician can exist exist within the Muslim world who is not anti-Israel. Every Muslim is shamed by the existence of Israel. Any temporary peace treaty that has been signed came as the result of the loss of territory in war. Worse yet, Israel continues to exist in spite of Muslim efforts, making Muslims powerless in the face of the omnipotent Jews. It is demeaning that 7 million Israelis are happy with their country, prosperous and growing, while 1 billion+ Muslims wallow in poverty. How can that be? The only possible explanation is that Israel is surreptitiously draining the blood from the Muslim Ummah and feeding it to their children with their Passover matzah!

  6. * From the Muslim point of view, it is Israel that has surrounded them.

    From the Biblical point of view, Jerusalem is a cup of reeling to the surrounding nations.

    * They are obsessed by Israel’s existence.

    Precisely. Therein lies their downfall.

Comments are closed.