Zakir Naik's Katzenyammer

Yep. He travelled the world and the 7 seas and now these filthy kaffirs put an end to it. Can’t have that.

May Allah  cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Their habitation is the Fire 3:151

The home secretary can stop people entering the UK if she believes there is a threat to national security, public order or the safety of citizens.  Theresa May said that visiting the UK was “a privilege, not a right”. That includes banning people if she believes their views glorify terrorism, promote violence or encourage other serious crime. Zakir Naik does all of these things. BBC

Radical Islamic preacher to challenge British entry ban

Sify News

Mumbai-based Islamic scholar Zakir Naik Saturday said he plans to challenge the ban order on him by the British Home Office in British courts.

‘The decision is politically motivated by the new government. My lawyers have already examined it in detail and we have a very strong case,’ Naik, a 44-year old medico-turned preacher, told IANS Saturday afternoon.

Naik’s lawyers in Britain plan to move the concerned courts early next week to get a reversal of the June 16 order of Home Secretary Theresa May, served on him a day before his scheduled departure to London (June 17).

If the courts grant a stay on or a reversal of the exclusion order, Naik is hopeful of gong ahead with the planned peace conference convened by him there next weekend, or else it would be cancelled.

Expressing outrage over the exclusion order, Naik said he has been giving religious lectures in Britain since the past 16 years besides holding a five-year visa to enter that country.

‘I have traveled all over the world, but never before in my past 16 years, anywhere in the world have I faced such a situation. It is tantamount to a mockery of the freedom of speech and expression,’ Naik said.

Terming the decision as ‘a politically motivated one,’ he said that the new British government has been under pressure to ban persons indulging in radical propaganda.

‘Even I fully endorse this view and have said many times in the past that individuals misguiding people in the name of religion should not be tolerated. But, strangely, I have been singled out for this exclusion order,’ he said.

He claimed that the British authorities are worried about the spread of Islam and the manner in which non-Muslims flock to his lectures all over the world.

“British authorities are worried about the spread of Islam?” Who’d have thought!   Not that we ever noticed! Last time we checked, British authorities were trying to replace the natives with a Mohammedan proletariat…..

He also accused the British Home Office of relying on certain manipulated and mischievous media reports to slap the exclusion order on him.

‘But, we have a strong case and my lawyers believe a reversal of the exclusion order is possible,’ he said.

Mumbai-born Naik is a qualified doctor who gave up his medical profession to specialize in a comparative study of all different world religions, highlighting the similarities and good points in them.

He belongs to a family of medical professionals hailing from Ratnagiri in Maharashtra’s costal Konkan region.

4 thoughts on “Zakir Naik's Katzenyammer”

  1. ‘ my lawyers ‘
    self important twat – if he had to make go of it in UK himself , he wouldn’t even get a job washing dishes

  2. Well at least he has received a knock doesn’t sound like he is too used to them. It will be good if his comments get more publicity.

  3. Dear friend,

    True-Islam and terrorism are antonyms, in fact Islam hates terrorism. Prophet Mohammed was a full fledged brave-warrior who stood against falsehood and he never resorted to any kind of terrorism or terrorist tactics that are similar to sudden bombing or fear-based torture even on his most deadliest enemies. Only the most deluded and the cowards will resort to terrorism as a retaliatory solution to any given problem. When Zakir Naik calls for the terrorizing of the terrorists, it is like calling for the raping of the rapists, it takes us to no solution.

    Zakir Naik justifies his definition of terrorism by saying that a thief is terrified by a policeman, and so a police man is a terrorist to a theif. This is wrong. A policeman is only terrifying the thief not terrorizing. A policeman only tries to imprison the thief, and if evidence is provided before the court, only then is corrective measures taken. A policeman is not a terrorist to a thief. Similarly there is no terrorism in Islam, even when against the real terrorist themselves. Prophet Mohammed was devoid of the least amount of terror. He did not even terrorize the very woman that poisoned him. People used to throw rubbish on his face, yet he was a man of great patience and forbearance and he won many a hearts. This is true Islam. Such a great man he really was!

    Prophet Mohammed will never use terrorism to fight terrorism, he always used the truth along with a brave army of companions to fight the infidels only in a war of reason, code and self-defense in the way of the Truth before Allah.

    Once Ali, companion of Prophet Mohammed was at war, and he got into a fight with a very dangerous criminal, he finally overcame him and sat on his chest to kill him. The opponent spat at his face. Ali at once left him. Seeing this the man was very much surprised and asked the reason. Ali said, “I was killing you for God’s sake but when you spat on my face, my sincerity was endangered because of the personal feelings of anger.” Hearing this the man immediately submitted and asked repentance to Al-God. Such was the honor and code that these men of Mohammed had, even at the crucial moments of war.

    Whereas terrorism is akin to a mad stupid man jumping from behind a bush, stabbing, bombing and shooting an unaware person at random to cause a state of fear all around. Mohammed will never support such cowardice. True-Islam and Terrorism are antonyms any day.

    Please to understand true Islam more… do visit this link


Comments are closed.