CNN & Newsweep: owned by the Muslim Brotherhood? Fareed Zakaria sez Hezbollah are the good guys…….

Weasel Zippers

Muslim Brotherhood Applauds Newsweek for Attacking “Stealth Jihad and Creeping Sharia” as Racist Terms…

What race is Islam again? WTF is going on here?

Newsweek, putting the useful in useful idiot. Via the Muslim Brotherhood’s official English language website, Ikhwanweb.

Stealth Jihad and Creeping Sharia, truly racist terms– Ikhwanweb (Weasel) Zippers

Fareed Zakaria sez Hezbollah are the good guys

Andrew Breitbart

CNN’s Zakaria Presents Hezbollah as a Model of Religious Tolerance

For a long time I have been warning about this snake:

Fareed Zakaria, the Indian born son of an  imam, is an Islamic agent provocateur. To give this creature  a soapbox at Newsweek, Time or CNN is the same as allowing Joseph Goebbles during WWII to pump Nazi propaganda into American living rooms. It never ceases to amaze me that 8 years after 9/11 America is still so ignorant and naive. To allow this enemy agent to make a good living behind enemy lines while obfuscating, minimizing and denying the threat from Islam is as fantastic and unreal as the Marxist Muslim POTUS. Zakaria is engaging claissic taqiyya and spins Islamic fairy tales all the while telling us there is nothing to worry about. Is the whole nation on crack?

Remembering that CNN’s president, Jon Klein, has touted its down-the-middle coverage and claims it is situated in the “center” of American politics, on a recent episode of Fareed Zakaria GPS, host Zakaria tried to claim that Lebanon’s terror group Hezbollah was some sort of model for religious tolerance. Someone should inform CNN that claiming Hezbollah is “religiously tolerant” is hardly a centrist position.

If we can discern “religious tolerance” in a group that says that the state of Israel should be wiped from the earth, then there is a new definition of “tolerance” that no one is aware of. But unbelievably here is CNN’s Zakaria coloring this murderous terror group as a “tolerant” organization.

Nice, middle of the road Hezbollah peaceniks……

Friendly Hezbollah granny waiting to give you a present…..

…and here’s the future: nice little kiddies, future social workers, all of them!

At the end of his August 22 show, Zakaria turned to discuss the re-construction of a Synagogue in Beirut, Lebanon, a project that Zakaria claims proves how open minded and tolerant Hezbollah is towards Jews.

So why did this nation, often teetering on the brink of religious hostilities and hostilities with Israel, restore a Jewish house of worship? To show that Lebanon is an open and tolerant country.

And indeed, the project is said to have found support in many parts of the community, not just from the few remaining Jews there, but also Christians and Muslims and Hezbollah. Yes, Hezbollah — the one that the United States has designated a foreign terrorist organization.

Hezbollah’s view on the renovation goes like this. “We respect divine religions, including the Jewish religion. The problem is with Israel’s occupation of Arab lands … not with the Jews.” Food for thought.

The first question that so easily strikes when listening to Zakaria’s rosy assessment is contained in the second paragraph. If Lebanon is so open and warm to other religions, why is it that this synagogue is wonderful not just for “the few remaining Jews there”? If Hezbollah and the state they control were so “tolerant” why is there only a “few remaining Jews” there? Why did those Jews leave if everything is so wonderful?

And of course the propaganda that Zakaria allows the spokesman for Hezbollah to babble, all about how they “respect divine religions including the Jewish religion,” is appalling.

Zakaria fails his viewers miserably to allow Hezbollah’s spokesman to dole out his lies without questioning him. As the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) notes, “Hezbollah has not been shy about admitting that, in its view, Israel occupies not just the West Bank but also Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa and every other inch of its sovereign territory.”

The fact is Hezbollah is wholly intolerant of the existence of Israel.

As Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah put it in a Sept. 18. 2009 speech, “Historic Palestine, from the sea to the river, belongs to the people of Palestine and to the whole [Muslim] nation.” Israel, he elaborated, “is a usurper and occupation entity, aggressive, cancerous, illegitimate, and illegal presence,” and nobody is permitted to recognize its existence.

The Jewish state, he continued, must be “wiped out”:

“[We] will never recognize ‘Israel.’ We will not work with ‘Israel.’ We will not normalize ties with ‘Israel.’ We will not surrender to ‘Israel.’ We will not accept ‘Israel’ even if the whole world recognizes it. Our faith, belief, and declaration will remain unchanged, that ‘Israel’ is an illegal presence [and] a cancerous gland, and must be wiped out of existence.”

Nasrallah has a long history of denouncing Israel and the Jews and has repeatedly called for their elimination. Additionally, Hezbollah has been linked to bombings and the murder of Americans, Jews, and people of other religions at least as far back as 1982, some of these incidents happened in other countries, too. And many western nations have classified Hezbollah as a terror organization.

But to CNN and Fareed Zakaria, why those nice Hezbollah folks are the very modern model of religious tolerance, don’t you know. Quite the “down-the-middle” position CNN has there, isn’t it?

4 thoughts on “CNN & Newsweep: owned by the Muslim Brotherhood? Fareed Zakaria sez Hezbollah are the good guys…….”

  1. “Stealth Jihad and Creeping Sharia, truly racist terms”
    Why do they insist on calling anything anti-islam or anti-muslim racist when neither is a race?
    Oh I forgot, it’s because then they can use the “race” card.

    If they weren’t complete liars their headline would read” Stealth Jihad and Creeping Sharia, truly truthful terms”, because that’s what they are. And that’s what they’re afraid of, the truth, so let’s keep dishing it out, wherever we post.

  2. Gee, would it be okay to call them “sharia lovers”?
    How about “jihad lovers”?
    Would anti-constitutionists be okay or is that racist as well?
    Can we refer to them as “Kafir-hate” lovers?
    How about “Jew-hate” lovers?

  3. I must confess that I have trouble finding words to describe these hypocritical lying shits.

  4. * Our faith, belief, and declaration will remain unchanged, that ‘Israel’ is an illegal presence [and] a cancerous gland, and must be wiped out of existence.”

    God’s declaration and covenant remains unchanged, and trumps anything that allah and its followers can come up with:

    [Now Yahweh said to Abram, “Get out of your country, and from your relatives, and from your father’s house, to the land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation. I will bless you and make your name great. You will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you. All of the families of the earth will be blessed in you.”] Genesis 12, in part

    allah, its false prophet, and its followers have invoked God’s curse upon themselves. Not a wise move.

Comments are closed.