Ayodhya: "Disputed Territory" or the Lost Honor of Historians?

Building Mosques over  holy sites of conquered nations is a Mohammedan speciality. It manifests the ideology of Islam as a supremacist juggernaut:

The mere fact that the Rama Janmabhumi (Rama’s birthplace) site in Ayodhya is well-established as a sacred site for Hindu pilgrimage, is reason enough to protect its functioning as a Hindu sacred site, complete with proper Hindu temple architecture. Ayodhya doesn’t have this status in any other religion, though ancient Buddhism accepted Rama as an earlier incarnation of the Buddha. The site most certainly doesn’t have such a status in Islam, which imposed a mosque on it, the Babri Masjid (ostensibly built in 1528, closed by court order after riots in 1935, surreptitiously turned into a Hindu temple accessible only to a priest in 1949, opened for unrestricted Hindu use in 1986, and demolished by Hindu militantsin 1992). So, the sensible and secular thing to do, even for those sceptical of every religious belief involved, is to leave the site to the Hindus. The well-attested fact that Hindus kept going there even when a mosque was standing, even under Muslim rule, is helpful to know in order to gauge its religious importance; but is not strictly of any importance in the present. For respecting its Hindu character, it is sufficient that the site has this sacred status today.

The Brussels Journal has the story

3 thoughts on “Ayodhya: "Disputed Territory" or the Lost Honor of Historians?”

  1. Just ANOTHER example of Islams penchant for building TRIUMPHALIST Mosques to insult those they defeat.

  2. Another travesty in Ephesis Turkey- Where John the Beloved apostle of Jesus is buried, and possibly the place where Mary, the mother of Jesus is also buried. The Turks put a mosque right over the top of it. No one knows what happened to the relics. Gone forever. Destroyed by Islam.

  3. There is a simple way to combat these pigs and here it is.
    Want to get rid of the Mosque plans @ Ground Zero ……

    It might even work…
    In Seville , Spain , the City Council authorized the construction of a Mosque on one of the empty pieces of land. The citizens did not want the mosque built in their vicinity and found a brilliant solution. They buried a pig in the land, and made the news public. The Islamic law prohibits the construction of a mosque on lands desecrated by remains of pigs,
    therefore the Muslims had to renounce the construction on this desecrated land…

    Astute Sevillans…The commentaries of the Civil Guard (Police) are very interesting. Maybe it is the solution needed by New York to avoid the construction of a mosque in the vicinity of the twin towers.

    The Israelis are using a similar strategy since 2004. They placed a box containing pig lard on the buses in Israel and made it public that any kamikaze suicide bomber who tries to assault a bus, risks the prohibition of entering the heaven by getting the pig lard on him. There are no suicide bombers on the buses in Israel any more.

Comments are closed.