Rape 'impossible' in marriage, says Muslim cleric

UK: Rape ‘impossible’ in Marriage, says Leading Muslim Cleric

Maulana Abu Sayeed of the Sharia Council of Britain

Doesn’t look as if these “Sharia Councils of Britain” contribute anything of value, or do they?

According to Sheikh Maulana Abu Sayeed, president of the Islamic Sharia Council in Britain, it is not possible for rape to occur in marriage. He claims women falsify rape claims to try and obtain a divorce. If a woman is brutalized by her husband, he claims this is undesirable, but an apology should suffice. Sayeed runs the largest network of Sharia courts in the UK. His comments have brought an outcry among law enforcement officials who fear that Sayeed’s comments will further discourage women from reporting being raped. (hat tip Atlas)

Note to feminazis who carry water for the most radical, intolerant ideology in the world: lay back and enjoy it, slave.

Rape ‘impossible’ in marriage, says Muslim cleric (thanks to Atlas Shrugs)


Stories of SELF-IMMOLATION: Why Muslim women try to burn themselves to death (WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGES)

It is stated that an average of 10 Muslim women self immolate every month in Afghanistan alone, worldwide over 100 a month. Why? They no longer wish to live as slaves under Islam.

10 thoughts on “Rape 'impossible' in marriage, says Muslim cleric”

  1. According to Allah (Quran), rape is not possible in marriage :

    YUSUFALI: They ask thee concerning women’s courses. Say: They are a hurt and a pollution: So keep away from women in their courses, and do not approach them until they are clean. But when they have purified themselves, ye may approach them in any manner, time, or place ordained for you by Allah. For Allah loves those who turn to Him constantly and He loves those who keep themselves pure and clean.

    YUSUFALI: Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will; but do some good act for your souls beforehand; and fear Allah. And know that ye are to meet Him (in the Hereafter), and give (these) good tidings to those who believe.

  2. Nope, “leading feminists” say: If you are going to die – take an honour guard with you!

    In the case of a slave this would be the slave-trader who sold her; the owner who mistreated her; and the lawmaker who claimed it was what her god expected of her!

    Better yet, get together with a few hundred other slaves and start a freedom revolution.

  3. The problem is I don’t believe in “rape in marriage” either. To a civilized Westerner, the idea of forced sex is of course repulsive but when two people are married, consent to sex need not be demonstrated. The proper way to handle a complaint of involuntary sex is to grant the petitioner separation or divorce.

    Bottom line: we don’t need crazy feminist jurisprudence to handle uncivilized Islamic jurisprudence.

  4. Most of those chin strapped bearded smelly old bastards would only get sex by rape. God forbid. One could not imagine anything worse than sex with those apes.

  5. Agree with soloview. Technically, a woman need not ever consent to marital relations with her husband…..yet he is subject to prison if he refuses (or is unable) to financially support her and their children…even if sexual deprivation leads to a divorce. Its no wonder muslims hate westerners so much. We men have voluntarily castrated ourselves under the law. No muslim male will never accept forced emasulation and, as much as they disgust me, I can’t help but see this particular part of the human condition their way.

    May all feminists be required to spend one month in Afghanistan. Then, upon their return, after they’ve kissed the airport tarmac, they can apologize to the first 100 men they see for being such spoiled little entitlement queens.

  6. Who gives a rats arse what is written in the koran. It is an evil book written by an even more wicked pedophile. The rules muslims follow are not relevant in England and English law. If the law is broken according to the law of the land, then these bastards must face the full extent of the justice system. Justice must be done and the perpetrator must be incarcerated for life with a goat for company.

  7. Joe if muslum hate westerns so much…then get the f**k out of the west!!! Go live with sand apes that agree with the barbaric idealogy of that child molesting prophet you follow.

    We know women would be perfertly safe from rape in Afghanistan. Everyone knows they are closeted homosexuals and prefer “bacha bazi” ….But I guess that isn’t rape either right??


  8. Interesting stuff: the creep is a war criminal from Bangladesh who found asylum in the UK

    War Criminal Sharia “Judge” Backs Rape In Marriage
    Guest Post, October 26th 2010, 12:00 pm

    via Harry’s Place

    This is a guest post by Akash

    The senior cleric of Britain’s main Islamic sharia court has sparked outrage by claiming that non-consensual sex in marriage cannot be called rape and is, therefore, not a criminal offence. In an interview with the Samosa blog, Sheikh Maulana Abu Sayeed, speaking as the head of the Islamic Sharia Council, said:

    “Clearly there cannot be any rape within the marriage. Maybe aggression, maybe indecent activity… Because when they got married, the understanding was that sexual intercourse was part of the marriage, so there cannot be anything against sex in marriage. Of course, if it happened without her desire, that is no good, that is not desirable.”

    British law was changed in 1991, making rape within marriage illegal but this is a detail which the head of the Islamic Sharia Council dismisses as an “aggression” against the man.

    Abu Sayeed considers it “not Islamic” to classify non-consensual marital sex as rape and prosecute offenders. In an astonishing exchange with the Samosa journalist, Sayeed revealed why he believes the prosecution of marital rape was due to misguided Western values, such as equality and justice:

    “Why it is happening in this society is because they have got this idea of so-called equality, equal rights. And they are misusing these equal rights in every single aspect of human conduct. That’s why. It is one aggression against another, and that is bigger aggression against minor one.”

    I asked Sheikh Sayeed what he considered to be the “bigger aggression”.

    “To call it rape. Rape is a criminal offence in this country; man will end up in prison for three, five years or more.”

    So the non-consensual sex is the minor aggression, and calling it rape is the major aggression?


    Why is calling it rape a major aggression?

    “Because within the marriage contract it is inherent there that man will have sexual intercourse with his wife. Of course, if he does something against her wish or in a bad time etc, then he is not fulfilling the etiquettes, not that he is breaching any code of sharia – he is not coming to that point. He may be disciplined, and he may be made to ask forgiveness. That should be enough.”

    It is deplorable that the head of the main Islamic Sharia court should maintain a position completely at odds with British law and to claim that the majority of women who say they have been raped or violently abused by their husbands are merely fabricating their stories to “expedite” divorce proceedings.

    Abu Sayeed in 1971

    But Imam Abu Sayeed has a sordid and viciously violent past which few people in Britain know anything about.

    In 1995, Channel4 aired a Dispatches documentary called ‘War Crimes File’ which exposed Abu Sayeed as one of three war criminals who had fled Bangladesh to live in Britain. Sayeed was then a “head teacher of a Muslim school and a co-opted member of Tower Hamlets Education Council” but the documentary revealed that he was a senior member of the Al-Badr death squad, a paramilitary offshoot of the Jamaat-e-Islam, which was responsible for the death of thousands of men and the systematic rape of untold more women during the Independence War of Bangladesh in 1971.

    Soon after the documentary was broadcast, it was quickly banned in the UK and remains so to this day, thanks to the litigious hair-trigger of Choudhury Mueen-Uddin, senior trustee of Muslim Aid, who, along with Sayeed, was exposed in the documentary as one of the three war criminals.

    Fortunately the internet is still the bane of censors, because the documentary footage can be found in its entirety on the superb Bangladesh Genocide Archive.

    As a young man, Sayeed was involved with the Islami Chattro Shangyo – the student wing of Jamaat-e-Islam. The Jamaat was then, as it is today, an extremist group of Muslim fundamentalists. In July 1971, the Jamaat-e-Islam organised a secret meeting in Dhaka, the purpose of which was to form the Al-Badr death squad, a violent jihad force created to aid the Pakistan army. Jamaat wanted to remain a part of the Islamic state of Pakistan and was violently opposed to the Independence movement. And in his home town of Sylhet, Abu Sayeed was recruited as a senior member of the Al-Badr.

    There is lots more, here

Comments are closed.