Whoopin' Stoopid

Fox Nation via WZ


Whoopi Goldberg Doesn’t Believe Japanese Attacked Pearl Harbor, Thinks Muslims More Persecuted Than Jews

By: Noel Sheppard

Whoopi Goldberg on Tuesday demonstrated an absolutely staggering ignorance concerning a variety of subjects.

Appearing on Fox News’s “O’Reilly Factor,” Goldberg admitted not knowing what a madrasa is, said it wasn’t the Japanese that attacked America at Pearl Harbor, and claimed Muslims in America are more persecuted than Jews (video follows with transcript and commentary):


BILL O’REILLY, Host: Do you believe in the world, we have a Muslim problem?



GOLDBERG: I think we have a terrorist problem.

O’REILLY: OK. So, you don’t believe we have a Muslim problem.

Would you agree with me that if all the good Muslims, and I think they overwhelm the bad Muslims, OK? Would cooperate with the West, with the United States and NATO and other countries, that we wouldn’t have a terrorist problem? For example, if Pakistan would cooperate with the United States, we wouldn’t have the Taliban problem in Afghanistan. We would defeat them.

GOLDBERG: That would all be great if that’s how it worked.

O’REILLY: But that’s how it works.

GOLDBERG: But it isn’t how it works, because, if you recall — think of it this way, that crazy gentleman, I take that back because that’s rude — the gentleman that said he was going to burn the Koran, that got played all around the world.

O’REILLY: You mean the nut down in Florida?

GOLDBERG: I’m not going to say that.

O’REILLY: OK, I will. But that, you’re diverting the attention.

GOLDBERG: No, no, I’m not. Listen to my point.

O’REILLY: All right. Go ahead.

GOLDBERG: So, all the people who are watching around the world saying, boy, America feels like that, so Americans —

O’REILLY: See, but I disagree. I don’t think Muslims think that everybody is like that crazy guy. I don’t believe that.

But let’s get back to Pakistan. Pakistan, if they would help us —

GOLDBERG: No, no. Bill, Bill.

O’REILLY: — we could win that.

GOLDBERG: Bill, do you think that the people in Pakistan, the people who live in Pakistan, the poor people, the people who don’t have any say, you think they don’t want help to help the West?

O’REILLY: A lot of them don’t. The madrasa — do you know what a madrasa is?

GOLDBERG: No, I don’t.

O’REILLY: OK. Madrasa is a school that teaches Islamic jihad and there are madrasas all over the Muslim world. They teach 4 and 5-year-old kids to hate people.

GOLDBERG: Bill, that may be true —

O’REILLY: It is true.

GOLDBERG: It may be true. I can’t prove it. You’ve clearly been —

O’REILLY: I can.

GOLDBERG: You’ve clearly been to them and I will take your word for it. But that does not change the fact that when you paint all Muslims with one brush, it’s bad.

So, this woman gets to discuss serious matters about religion and terrorism on national television, but she’s never heard of a madrasa. But that’s just the beginning:

O’REILLY: I’m not painting all Muslims with one brush.

GOLDBERG: But when you say Muslims killed us, when you don’t specify. It’s like saying whenever I see black men coming down the street, I’m scared. That’s the same —

O’REILLY: Do you have a problem in history when you were taught about World War II that Japanese attacked us? Do you have a problem with that?

GOLDBERG: I have a problem with that.

O’REILLY: Do you?


O’REILLY: But they attacked us?

GOLDBERG: The Japanese —

O’REILLY: Attacked us.

GOLDBERG: — army attacked us.

O’REILLY: The air force did.

GOLDBERG: Sorry, the air force did. You understand my point?

Understand your point? The Japanese air force attacked us on December 7, 1941, NOT the Japanese?

Goldberg apparently has “a problem” saying it was the Japanese because all of that nation’s people weren’t on the planes that morning!

But there’s still more:

O’REILLY: No, I don’t, because I think you are cutting the hair so thin. We have a Muslim problem in the world in the sense that 90 percent of the terrorism.

GOLDBERG: Bill, we’re going to disagree.

O’REILLY: Come from that area.

GOLDBERG: You know what? What do you mean 90 percent of the terrorists —


GOLDBERG: — are from everywhere. They are white.

O’REILLY: No, predominantly they are Muslims.

GOLDBERG: Right now.

O’REILLY: Right. That’s what we are talking about.

GOLDBERG: Right now, everybody can say the Muslims are the terrorists. Two years ago, it was the white people that were the terrorists.

O’REILLY: What white people?

GOLDBERG: Oh, wasn’t it white people that blew up Oklahoma City?

O’REILLY: Yes, two of them. Two of them.

GOLDBERG: What about all the folks


O’REILLY: It’s like saying crime is white is black.

GOLDBERG: Bill, we disagree.

O’REILLY: All right. We disagree.

GOLDBERG: We disagree on this.

O’REILLY: But I just want to be clear.

GOLDBERG: And it’s OK.

O’REILLY: We have to have these discussions.

GOLDBERG: We must have these discussions.

O’REILLY: Right. But I just want to be clear and I’ll give you the last word on this and then we’ll get to your book.


O’REILLY: I believe there is a Muslim problem in the world.


O’REILLY: And that’s what I was trying to get across to you guys on “The View.”


O’REILLY: That 70 percent of Americans believe the way I do. They thought it was inappropriate to make a Muslim community center that close to Ground Zero. That was my point.

GOLDBERG: I understood your point. What did I not understand and I will just reiterate it again because —

O’REILLY: I just left out the word terrorist.

GOLDBERG: Yes. Because in this day and age when kids are getting their butts kicked because they are Muslim, OK?

O’REILLY: Not so much.

GOLDBERG: Bill, are you kidding me?

O’REILLY: New study today, Jews in America are far more likely to be persecuted than Muslims, just came out today.

GOLDBERG: You know what? I’m sure that someone believes that, but I believe that in neighborhoods where they don’t want Muslims, they beat up kids.

She’s sure someone believes that? Well, I don’t know what new report O’Reilly was talking about, but as NewsBusters reported in August, according to the FBI, Jews in 2008 were victims of hate crimes ten times as much as Muslims.

Alas, such facts are unimportant to Goldberg, for she believes anything she wants regardless of all the inconvenient truths out there.

Of course, that is her right. After all, ignorance is bliss.

But that she has a national platform like ABC’s “The View,” with over 3.5 million viewers on a daily basis, to spread this ignorance is deeply disturbing.

11 thoughts on “Whoopin' Stoopid”

  1. Actually, it was 10 years ago and the so-called “white people” were IRA and ETA.
    Surprise surprise, some terrorists are “white people” today too – and they are muslim. This has NOTHING to do with skin colour.

    Whoopie equates muslim=not white and feels attacked.

    People cannot help not being born an Einstein, however, there is NO excuse for her ignorance, or for thinking that the world is only Black or White.

    1. Fair enough.

      But the IRA and ETA don’t have an immutable Koran, a doctrine of permanent warfare against unbelievers, a doctrine to subjugate unbelievers and make them pay the jiziya with willing submission while feeling subdued and humiliated.

      And the IRA and ETA never had a command from allah to seek world domination.

      No matter which way you look at it, there’s just no excuse to willfully display such ignorance and stupidity on TV.


      Whoopie Stoopid is a vile creature. She is neither “funny” nor a “fine” actress. She is an ignorant racist, totally devoid of any educated perspective on the issues facing our nation today. To allow her to express her misguided opinions in the national media is a travesty.

      To the Left, facts are less relevent than faith in the dogma. Thus, the study that O’Reilly cites is his “belief,” while Goldberg maintains her own “belief” unsubstantiated by any facts. Facts that challenge dogma are ignored or marginalized.

  2. With a name like hers – she was always in trouble. Remember her white boyfriend Ted Danson and that fiasco. She and he are bloody morons.

  3. You would think that some well meaning blacks would want her to shut up. What an embarassment to have that cretin as a spokesperson.

  4. Lefty/liberal/progressive types don’t need facts. The facts get in the way of their self-styled world. The scary part is that one day, she’ll be long gone and there will be a whoopi jr. to take her place. And, Yes, the “w” in lower case for the obvious reasons.

  5. Dont be silly ‘gsw’ you know the rules Blacks cant be RACISTS. But with their scientifically proven average 15 point lower IQ rating than “whitey’ and even more against “Asians’ they can be STUPID. A privilege Whoopi cushion lives up to in ‘spades’ LOL. Like most dim witted Left wing Moonbats Whoopi has to have to have her head dragged out of the sand and the truth thrust in their faces which they still choose not to believe. Its HYPOCRISY a trait they share with Islam where it is one of their ‘Pillars’ along with ‘Lies’ ‘Misogyny’ ‘antisemitism’ and ‘Taqqiya’

  6. “To the Left, facts are less relevent than faith in the dogma. ….Facts that challenge dogma are ignored or marginalized.”-Sheikyermami

    Mind if I borrow those lines, Sheik, they’re perfect?

  7. Realist,
    The mean IQ of Asians and Caucasians is very similar – however you have to be very careful and precise in defining a marker for measuring IQ. Under some markers Africans do much better than the rest. Intelligence is a function of evolution, and that means that evolutionary pressures shape the form of intelligence. People like Ms. Goldberg, who are simply uneducated wrt to the matter she spoke on (assuming that what she said was not taken out of context) are actually a danger because others believe the disinformation. Other examples of such: 1) asian are brighter than europeans (false)
    2) women are not capable of doing fundamental work in the theoretical sciences (false)
    3) boys are not a intelligent as girls (false)
    and a large number of unfounded and untested propositions that arise in the news, written by people like Ms. Goldberg. Advice: read such a proposition – then test it – at the very least level of effort you will find counter-examples.
    There seems to be a major effort through the media in dumbing us down – be aware and work to shut it down.

  8. kaw I think you will find that Back IQ i.e their ability to absorb knowledge is on average 15 points down of Whites and even more so on “Asians” as I said. Education and access to education is not the question ability to LEARN by being educated is and as I said Blacks are on average 15 pints less able than whites to absorb education.

  9. As you can see my education is sadly lacking I make ‘typos’ that should be ‘BLacks’ and ‘pOints.’

  10. Hi Realist,
    My main point is that these statements depend on the markers that you use to define intelligence. This is, at present, an open question. Let me give you an example. If we were to measure intelligence in terms of the ability to find novel and new ways to solve mathematical/scientific puzzles then Caucasians are slightly ahead. If we were to measure intelligence by the ability to absorb and understand knowledge to some level – but not expand upon it – the Asians are then also slightly ahead. If we were to talk about the ability to communicate in several ways as a marker then Africans would be amongst the leaders. And again , since we can expect a Gaussian distribution there are outliers to the right – ie people of above-average capabilities – from all races. So, under some markers black folks do better than others – but how you define intelligence is the question – I would suggest that you make a definition and then I will continue the discussion. Incidentally, it was precisely over this point that the Noble prize winning scientist Watson (He and Crick formulated the basic mechanism of DNA) had his career destroyed by the moronic and criminal left wing press when he stated that it is possible that intelligence is a function of evolutionary pressure (this is a valid statement if we make the claim that being intelligent enables you to survive :-)). Under these conditions we could expect two parallel societies that evolve under different evolutionary pressure to have slightly different markers for intelligence. Clearly an example is a tribal paleolithic society (ie tribal Africa) and a urban industrial society (Europe) though here the time scale is probably too short for significant differences. Watson make the error of using balck and white as an example, which was pounced upon the illiterate and stupid PC media after they failed completely and utterly to understand what he actually said.

Comments are closed.