Obama Regime & United Islamic Umma vs Rep. Peter King

Its the Muslim usurper in chief against America:

White House: “Individuals From Many Different Faiths Succumb to Terrorist Ideologies”

Watch out for the Methodists and the Amish!

Useful idiots rally against King hearings (JW)

Obama spokesman: “Being religious is never un-American. Being religious is quintessentially American.”

Really? Being religious in any way? Then why was the Waco compound besieged and burned down? Why was Mormon polygamy outlawed? Jim Jones was a terrific fellow?

STERLING, Va. (AP) — Muslim Americans are not part of the terrorism problem facing the U.S. – they are part of the solution, a top White House official said Sunday at a Washington-area mosque.

No. They are our implacable enemy.

Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough set the Obama administration’s tone for discussions as tensions escalate before the first in a series of congressional hearings on Islamic radicalization. The hearings, chaired by New York Republican Peter King, will focus on the level of cooperation from the Muslim community to help law enforcement combat radicalization.

The majority of the recent terror plots and attempts against the U.S. have involved people espousing a radical and violent view of Islam. (As if there was another one!) Just a few weeks ago a college student from Saudi Arabia who studied chemical engineering in Texas was arrested after he bought explosive chemicals online. It was part of a plan to hide bomb materials inside dolls and baby carriages and blow up dams, nuclear plants or the Dallas home of former President George W. Bush. (Source)

White House: “Individuals From Many Different Faiths Succumb to Terrorist Ideologies”

More protests on King hearings: Muslims feel “unfairly singled out” over jihadist terrorism

Here is a piece from across the pond on the watered-down hearings on Islamic “radicalization” that are nonetheless provoking waves of protests by Muslims in America, who are displaying more outrage and more intensive mobilization over King’s hearings than at the continued stream of attempted jihadist attacks on the United States — oh, sorry, almost all of those were “entrapment,” we were told.

Apparently even this much attention to Islam in connection with terrorism is too close for comfort. One might say they “doth protest too much.” And so they employ two major tactics: 1.) Deflect attention by appropriating victim status, and 2.) Silence the discussion by acting as though criticism of Islam or Muslims is tantamount to inciting to hate crimes.

But the character of this story is highly consistent with Peter Sissons’ account of pro-Islamic bias at the BBC, in addition to being just plain sloppy. More protests on King hearings


Wh terror

King to Press On With Hearings on Radical Islam Despite Protests in New York

Fox News

(This goose is cooked. You can stick a knife in it. The Muslims are laughing their dirty asses off!)

Feb. 16: House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington before the Senate Commerce Committee hearing on “Safeguarding Our Future: Building a Nationwide Network for First Responders.”

King is already on the defense:

Noting CAIR’s history as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a terrorist funding case, King said CAIR is exactly the kind of group Muslim leaders should “push aside.”

“I’m not going to give into political correctness. I’m going ahead,” King told Fox News.

Shining a light on Islam brings out Muselmaniacs in droves…..

WASHINGTON — Radical Islam poses a threat to the United States as a whole, but is particularly dangerous to American Muslims who are targeted by terror groups, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee said Sunday in defending upcoming hearings on radical Islam.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., is facing a backlash, including a Sunday protest in New York, over his decision to hold Thursday’s hearing — the first in a series — on the threat of Islamic radicalization. King said he’s surprised the American-Muslim community is not embracing his hearings because they are the ones most victimized when radical elements infiltrate their communities.

“I’ve said time and again the overwhelming [majority] of Muslims are good Americans, but the threat is coming from their community and we have to find out why, how it is being done and how to stop it,” he told Fox News. “We have an absolute obligation to investigate that.”

Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim elected to the House, said that while it’s proper to investigate radicalization, he thinks it is wrong to single out a religious minority.

“If we’re going to talk about gang violence, I don’t think it’s right to talk about, you know, only the Irish community and the Westies. I think we talk about gang violence. I think, if we’re going to talk about organized crime, it’s not right to just talk about the Russian community,” Ellison said during a Sunday appearance with King on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

However, Ellison, who will be participating in the hearings, added that it makes sense to talk to the Muslim community about how to “meet the challenge of public security” to prevent people like Anwar al-Awlaki, the American cleric who fled to Yemen, from reaching his tentacles into American-Muslim communities.

“I think it makes sense to talk about the Internet, confronting ideology of people like Anwar al-Awlaki. I think where he’s trying to exploit and misuse Islam, we should counter him with what Islam really does say. And so I do think that there is a place for that. I just think it doesn’t make sense to narrow in on a discreet, insular group that has already been the target of a certain amount of discrimination,” Ellison said.

King said that among the witnesses testifying at his hearing are family members of two men who were radicalized — one was murdered and one committed an act of violence. He said they will discuss how the imams at the mosques they attended were involved and will offer “telltale indicators” so people can be aware of radicalization efforts within their surroundings.

“Also, we’ll see from witnesses how often they are told not to cooperate with the FBI, not to cooperate with the police, and, somehow, a wall of silence builds up and that is part of why I’m holding the hearings,” King told Fox News.

King added that while German officials are labeling the murder of two American airmen at an airport in German “radical Islam,” the U.S. State and Homeland Security departments have refused to call it terrorism.

“It was terrorism, obviously, and should be called that,” King said. “An American soldier who is defending our country was shot overseas by an Islamist and if that isn’t terrorism, I don’t know what is.”

King said he has a good working relationship with DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, but he doesn’t know why the Obama administration isn’t labeling the murder terrorism even as the president’s deputy national security adviser was preparing to give a speech on the administration’s approach to countering domestic radicalization.

“I think my position on the administration is not as far apart as some might think. I’m just carrying their position to the logical conclusion,” he said.

In remarks prepared for delivery Sunday, Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough said the United States does not practice guilt by association.

“We have a choice. We can choose to send a message to certain Americans that they are somehow ‘less American’ because of their faith or how they look; that we see their entire community as a potential threat — as we’ve seen in several inexcusable incidents in recent weeks across the country that were captured on video. … Or, we can make another choice. We can send the message that we’re all Americans,” he said.

4 thoughts on “Obama Regime & United Islamic Umma vs Rep. Peter King”

  1. “We will not practice what Muslims practice” – reminds me of hopn’ change.

    Obama cretin:

    “we will not stigmatize or demonize entire communities because of the actions of a few.”

    Once again, the decrepid New York Slimes portrays the Muslims as ‘victims’ of some imaginary witch hunt……

  2. No one would say the American people have not honoured their God, and their country. The Founding Fathers planned it this way. Great strides of freedom in Speech, Religion and so on. But there is a difference – If we are talking about religions her Mr. Obama. America has been in the past, the first to rip out cults that have been injurious to their citizens. David Karehs, and his Texan cult and followers were blown off the face of the earth. Some burnt alive, women and children. All American Citizens. Wow. What has become of this religious verve? Dont see the FBI coming out in force every time a Muslim burns the American Flag. Neither do we. We have all let them walk straight over us and are government sanctioned.

    1. Quite right, catherine.

      I believe his name was David Koresh

      Slick Willie was in charge at that time, but typically for his type, denied any responsibility.

      For the American enemedia, a Socialist can do no wrong. And he can never be blamed.

Comments are closed.