Geert Wilders, the Dutch Inquisition & Mushrooming Mosques

by sheikyermami on April 16, 2011

This is refreshing: for the first time an article in the enemedia that doesn’t use smearwords like ‘right wing extremist populist racist’ and all the other derogatory epithets of the far left smear machine:

NIS News, AMSTERDAM, 16/04/11 - MP Geert Wilders’ defence asked the district court in Amsterdam on Friday to prosecute Islam expert Bertus Hendriks for perjury. When the court refused this demand, the defence asked for the judges to be replaced.

Bram Moszkowicz, Wilders’ lawyer, wanted an investigation of perjury launched against Hendriks. The lawyer stated that Hendriks made a statement as witness in the case on Friday morning that was in conflict with an earlier commentary that he gave in De Pers newspaper on the now notorious ‘dinner’ on 3 May 2010. (Continued below the fold)

Related News:

The Marxist Muslim Convergence

The Hague council on Thursday rejected a Freedom Party proposal to ban the construction of new mosques in the city.

All parties fiercely rejected the proposal which they branded as discriminatory because the Freedom Party is not opposed to the construction of new places of worship of other religions.

The local party Islam Democrats said it felt discriminated against and the Hague City Party (HSP) spoke of a “provocation, pure and simple.” (more)

Wilders trial, continued:

A dinner club met on 3 May last year, of which Hendriks was a member. Fellow Islam expert Hans Jansen was also invited to it. Jansen already appeared on Thursday as a court witness and stated that Judge Tom Schalken tried to convince him at the dinner table that Wilders must be convicted.

Hendriks was the person who invited Jansen to the dinner. “That he was an expert witness in the case seemed interesting to us,” Hendriks said earlier in De Pers. But on Friday, he said in the court that there was no connection whatever with the Wilders case.

Hendriks thereby committed perjury, said Moszkowicz. But the court rejected this request to launch an investigation. The lawyer then asked for the judges to be replaced for alleged bias.

Moszkowicz earlier already requested for new judges twice. He failed once but got his way the second time. It was still unclear on Friday evening whether the new request would be honoured.

Hendriks acknowledged Friday that the dinner club, which has been meeting for eight years, only invited a guest for the second time ever. The idea was to talk with Jansen on Islam in general and not about the Wilders case, he stated. Nonetheless, judge Schalken had a briefcase with him containing the verdict in which he had ordered the OM to prosecute Wilders for incitement to hatred and discrimination.

But according to Hendriks, Jansen himself started talking about the Wilders case. Jansen termed the proceedings against the MP a “witch-hunt”. On this, Schalken gave his opposing views, said Hendriks, who concluded all in all that there was no question of the judge trying to influence Jansen regarding a hearing on 6 May 2010, three days after the dinner.

 

Join the discussion...

Too small? Click here This is a satirical website. None of what you read here has anything to do with Islam, because Islam is a Religion of Peace. Everybody knows that good Muslims never do the things they do, (because Allah does it for them, Quran 8:12) and we know that only our misperceptions, ignorance and stereotyping of Islam makes Muslims chop off heads, kill and rape women and children, bomb subways, buses, nightclubs and fly jets into buildings. If it wasn't for the media and da Jooozzz, we wouldn't even know its happening. We welcome open, honest, thoughtful, and vigorous discussion in the comments threads, so do yourself a favour and don't accuse us of being 'haters' because we are loving, tolerant people. Don't curse us, don't threaten us with death or hellfire, and don't accuse us of being "just like the terrorists" because we don't do to Muslims what they do to us or to themselves. Yes, we know that only idiots oppose Islam and sensible people submit, but  you should know that we are ignorant bigots, hypocrites and Islamophobes, and we prefer to remain that way... But since you are forcing yourselves (and your abhorrent belief-system on us) we will defend ourselves, because we must. Avoid tu quoque and ad hominem attacks. Don't bother with circular reasoning either, we been there, done it.  If you annoy us, you will be banned and your posts summarily deleted. Try to add to the discussion, don't try to sell snake oil, don't try to cover us with Islamic shrouds of kitman and taqiyya, don't bother with da'awa, (we've heard it before) don't spam us with long pieces of cut & paste, write in English, try to tell the truth, (we know that's hard for you because you are all pathological liars) but the truth will set you free, try it! One more thing: don't think you can post here under multiple monikers. You will quickly be disappeared! The same goes for trufers and conspiracy kooks: you get one chance, one time. Blow it out of your ass if you must; put your stupidity on display. But you won't be back, trust me on that. Take a deep breath before you post, try to make some sense, do not just vent, do not make a fool of yourself and if you prove us wrong you can earn 10 Islamic dollars for your piggy bank. Deal?

{ 1 trackback }

Geert Wilders: Schlusswort vor Gericht « kopten ohne grenzen
May 4, 2011 at 1:05 pm

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

ethan April 17, 2011 at 12:09 am

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: