The Allah of Muhammad is not the God of Abraham, Moses and Jesus

From the EDL website:

Writing in today’s Telegraph, Allison Pearson seems to have started to understand the nature of the 7th century Islam that has taken hold in our towns and cities.

How did we end up with a school in the East Midlands where the door opens to release the children into the spring sunshine and out flaps a flock of crows? Young girls my daughter’s age clad from head to toe in inky black, a sight both alien and intimidating. “It’s their own choice,” runs the argument, so it must be tolerated by our liberal society. Exactly what choice does an 11-year-old girl have when her designated school uniform is a magician’s black cloth that conceals her from the world and never brings her back? Think of the paranoia that shroud breeds not just in the child who wears it but also in those who look upon her and turn away in dislike. At what point does tolerating the intolerant become intolerable?

How did we end up with this indeed. Fortunately for Allison, David Cameron has been busy answering her question. He’s wrong, of course, but then he hasn’t fully understood Islam yet.

David Cameron seems to be blaming the previous Labour government for allowing uncontrolled immigration and obviously there’s some truth in this. But Elvis Costello wrote “London is full of arabs” in his song in 1979. Obviously Elvis Costello was talking about rich petrodollar laden Arabs sloshing their enormous, unearned wealth around London in the late 70’s, drinking every club in London dry of fine scotch and providing gainful employment for literally thousands of whores and probably a fair few rent boys too. Far too many politicians of all colours have been bought with cushy non-exec directorships and fat retirement plans.

And while David Cameron is right to blame unchecked immigration and an open cheque book for new immigrants on Labour, the sell out to Islam had begun many years earlier. In fact we can go back a long way to the point where Neville Chamberlin declared in a cabinet meeting in April 1939:

*Prime Minister :“If we must offend one side let us offend the Jews rather than the Arabs.”

The Chariot of Israel by Harold Wilson p.104.

Because we wouldn’t want to offend those nice, civilised Arabs with all their OIL.

But getting back to Allison Pearson. She ends her piece with one of the greatest observations that can be made about Islam. It’s something that either hits you in the mouth by accident or slowly emerges after years of studying Islam’s core texts, doctrines and especially the life of Islam’s “perfect man” and prophet who’s example is to be followed by all good Muslims.

I have a final question for Muhammad’s problem page. What kind of a God would give a girl a voice, then keep her in a cage and never let her sing?

And that is the money. That is the line that cracks open the door. The Allah of Muhammad is not the God of Abraham, Moses and Jesus. The god of Islam is the anti-thesis of what we in the west believe God to be (even for those who don’t believe in God).

And the phrase “Abrahamic religions” is one of the most dangerous un-truths planted in our language by Islam. The idea that the God of the Hebrew bible and by almost direct inclusion of the un-altered Hebrew bible in the Christian Bible, shows any similarity with the pagan moon god derived Allah of Islam is very dangerous.

What Muhammad stole from the Jews who resided in the Arabian peninsula in the 7th century (aside from their wives, daughters, property and lives) were their stories. These were mangled and mis-represented to form the Koran. That Muhammad knew to place the Arabs as illegitimate descendants of the slave girl in the Hebrew bible story of Abraham was a stroke of pure genius. In all probability, the Jews had already worked this out as a separation of the semitic people into Jews and the others (who would always be more numerous).

So whether or not we ban burkas is a debate we must continue to have, but the most important step is understanding what Islam is and why it isn’t a religion like the others that our western ways are largely derived from. And Dave, immigration isn’t the problem. Just scaling back the numbers won’t help you now unless you pay close attention to which immigrants bring with them an alien supremacist system and seek to impose their rules on all others.

3 thoughts on “The Allah of Muhammad is not the God of Abraham, Moses and Jesus”

  1. Okay, I am going to tell you the truth that sets all free. Do you dare to read it all? Do you dare to prove all things?
    Satan has deceived the whole world Rev 12:9 until a woman delivers the true word to the world Rev 12:5, Rev 12:13 from the wilderness Rev 12:6. This true word delivered John 1:1 turns the hearts of the fathers to the children of God because not one child of God will be put in a hell fire no matter what their sins. It never entered the heart or mind of God to ever do such a thing Jer 7:31, Jer 19:5. This is proven by the word of God at and then some.

  2. “Freedom of choice” to wear a black sack, but racist to display an English flag in the car.

    One example:

    More than 1,200 workers have been banned from flying England flags on their own cars by managers – over fears they could deemed as racist.

    * And the phrase “Abrahamic religions” is one of the most dangerous un-truths planted in our language by Islam.

    The cuckoo has laid its eggs in the nest…



    In order to make the claim that Mohammed was descended from Ishmael, 8th century Islamic history creator Ibn Ishak even invented a genealogy for him. This was of course done without a single historical reference that preceded Mohammed. Sadly, for Muslims – even today – Ishak’s genealogy trumps the one we received through Moses and the record of the Old Testament. Not only did Ishaq assign what were, from his tribe the Quraysh, at the time modern Arabic language names to the characters he created in Mohammed’s lineage, that were supposed to have lived thousands of years before, but he included only 40 generations between the two.
    There are 2,670 years between Ishmael and Mohammed. Suggesting only 40 generations, would require over 66 years per generation. Yet we know from actual Arabian historical record that the average Arabian generation was about 17-20 years.
    Mohammed himself had a 6 year old “wife”, that he consummated his marriage with when she was 9 years old, so a generation of 17-20 years is not a surprise. Indeed Muslims try to legitimize that marriage by declaring that desert dwelling girls reached sexual maturity earlier than girls in other parts of the world, and that is what they suggest determines whether a girl is of child bearing age, though I don’t believe the medical community would agree.
    So then the 2,670 years between Ishmael and Mohammed, divided by 20 year generations, would have required over 133 Arabic generations between them. So Ishak not only invented characters of a couple thousand years before, and ascribed 8th century style Arabic names to them, but also spanned 2,670 years with only 40 generations.
    However, according to many hadith writers, Mohammed himself prohibited any tracing of his genealogy past the 17th generation. This is one reason that Ibn-Ishak was considered by the Muslim scholars of his time as being guilty of forgery and fabricating false genealogies. From “Islam: In Light of History”.
    “Long before Ibn Ishak, Muslims who lived in Mohammed’s own time also fabricated genealogies in an attempt to connect Mohammed to the descendants of Ishmael. Mohammed himself rejected all of those false genealogies and he put limits regarding the genealogy of his ancestors. Amru bin al-As wrote:
    ‘Mohammed genealogized himself regarding his ancestors until he reached al-Nather bin Kinaneh, then he said ‘anyone who claimed otherwise or added further ancestors, has lied.'”
    A couple thousand years of history isn’t something that is recalled and recorded by a single man, 2,000 years later, but rather is the result of a record that has been noted by the people that lived in or near the times that were written about. Whether in cave paintings, on stone monuments, silver bowls, pottery, or a written record of the times. Yet Islamic “tradition” was recorded without any reference to historical record that predated the late 6th century.
    Muslims even today hold that Mohammed was a descendant of Ishmael, not only in spite of Mohammed’s own prohibition against it, but even in light of the fact that the name Ishmael does not occur in a single instance within the archaeological or historical record of Arabia, prior to the pens of the 7th and 8th century Islamic “tradition” creators. Compare that with the use of the name Isaac, throughout the history of Israel, for example.
    To our Muslim friends, will you continue to reject the 1600 year record of God to mankind, through all of the prophets and witnesses of God’s Word, to follow the rehashed fables, flying camels, and fictional history of 7th and 8th century writers, that did little more than expand on Ibn Ishak’s fictional history?
    Why not drop by the Muslims4Jesus channel and listen to testimonies of former Muslims that have come to know the love of the one true God through a personal relationship? May God bless you and guide you to the truth of His Son our Savior, Jesus Christ.
    John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
    The annotations that have been appearing are active links to other videos.
    Please join us in the Islam-Christian Forum at the first link to the right, or below this video, for discussion on this subject and much more.
    Visit for information on Islam in Bible prophecy.
    Visit for an introduction to the Gospel.
    And visit for more on Islam and the origins of Islamic rituals.

Comments are closed.