The unraveling of Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama II

“The biggest scam ever”

Trumping up the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama

Just in thanks to Gramfan (CFP)

To those who are now speaking out about the Obama eligibility matter, I can think of no better statement than the one uttered by a very frustrated Officer John McClane, played by Bruce Willis in the movie“Die Hard.” In order to get the attention of a police officer oblivious to the carnage taking place inside of the Nakatomi Plaza building after making a very cursory inspection and finding nothing amiss,McClane tosses the body of a terrorist from an office window window onto the windshield of the police cruiser and fires at the police car, yelling “welcome to the party, pal.

I suspect that this statement accurately reflects the sentiment of numerous individuals and groups who have been fighting in the real world trenches for full disclosure of all of Barack Hussein Obama’s records, including his birth certificate, for the last three years. People such as Commander Charles Kerchner (retired) andAttorney Mario Apuzzo, Pennsylvania Attorney Philip Berg, Reverend David Manning of Atlah Ministries,  and numerous others who have spoken out and taken their valiant fight for full disclosure of Obama’s records to the nation’s courts, only to be struck down for lack of standing or other arbitrary judicial opinions.

Due to the recent public statements by billionaire businessman turned reality television star about the birth certificate issue, the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama has gained equal amounts of renewed interest and contempt by the American media and a vocal segment of the American public. The latter display of contempt is nicely displayed by some recent interview clips, including the priceless Meredith Viera interview of Donald Trump where she can hardly hold back her disdain of Mr. Trump and the entire eligibility matter, and Donald Trump’s appearance on “The View” last month.

On “The View,” Mr. Trump wreaked havoc among the cadre of women co-hosts when he merely mentioned the lack of a legitimate birth certificate provided by Obama. Lacking any coherent or intellectual rebuttals to Trump’s claims, a not-so veiled accusation of racism was leveled against Trump by “The View” co-host Whoppi Goldberg, while Barbara Walters expressed discomfort with the matter by simply wanting to change the topic.

“Welcome to the party, pal”

During the last three years, there have been numerous individuals, authors, investigative journalists, and others (and I consider myself among them) who have been mocked, ridiculed, belittled or ignored by Obama supporters, the liberal media, and the political left for even suggesting that this issue has any merit whatsoever.

Perhaps even worse, conservatives on the right, including some high profile media personalities, have joined with the left in the same vitriolic ridicule of us so-called “Birthers,” a pejorative term ascribed to those who are merely asking for yet-unfurnished proof that Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally eligible to occupy the office of the President of the United States.

It has been only after Donald Trump began to ask the same questions others have been asking for the last three years that the matter appears to have morphed from a fringe topic into legitimacy. For example, Rush Limbaugh, who has kept this topic at arm’s length, has taken delight of the Viera interview, although it’s difficult to discern whether Mr. Limbaugh is more delighted at Mr. Trump’s steam roller approach and Viera’s reaction, or that the issue is being finally exposed in such an unlikely venue. Because Mr. Limbaugh has the ear of millions every day, I tend to gravitate to the former.

To those who are now beginning to pick up the topic because of the exposure by Donald Trump, I can only say “welcome to the party, pal.”

With all due respect to Donald Trump, he has not “legitimized” the eligibility issue, as the matter far exceeds the existence of the birth certificate and has adversely affected the lives of many patriotic Americans who have long fought for full disclosure of all of Obama’s records. Promising to be the “most transparent” president in history,  Barack Hussein Obama is the most deliberately opaque president who has withheld many more records than his birth certificate. Not only has he withheld his records, he has fought to keep them hidden from public view, amassing legal fees that some claim to exceed a million dollars of his own money, and perhaps twice that amount if pro-bono and other legal work is counted.

Also as a result of his refusal to disclose his records, a respected military physician is presently serving time in Leavenworth for refusing to obey deployment orders until he was satisfied that the orders he was given were constitutionally legal. LTC. Terry Lakin, an honored veteran with 18 unblemished and distinguished years of service, lost his legal battle and remains behind bars as Obama’s first political prisoner in the war for truth. While many may question the methods and venue in which LTC Lakin chose to take up his battle, no one can question his motives.

“The biggest scam ever”

Both Messrs Trump and Limbaugh have stated that if Obama is determined to be ineligible to hold office, it is the “biggest scam ever” perpetrated. Indeed, and that statement itself might be an understatement.

I urge those reading this and those who are pursuing the truth to avoid “battlefield myopia” and not merely cling to the existence or lack thereof of the long form, authenticated birth certificate. The issue is much greater than the birth certificate or where Obama was physically born, as he could have been born in the Lincoln bedroom during the Kennedy administration and still be ineligible to hold the office of president under Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. Our founders determined that future presidents must be born to two parents who are both U.S. citizens. Clearly then, the place of Obama’s birth is merely one concern, while the citizen aspect of his parents remains another.

But the scam goes much deeper. Reviewing only the admissions of Barack Obama, we are told that Obama was born to U.S. citizen Stanley Ann Dunham, legally adopted by a foreign national named Lolo Soetoro, had taken the name Barry SOETORO, and was given Indonesian citizenship. He was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia, and attended a school there that accepted all faiths. At one point, Barry SOETORO moved to Hawaii to reside with his grandparents after Lolo SOETORO and Stanley Ann DUNHAM divorced. Obama completed high school as Barry SOETORO Much is missing from his early years, including a legal name change from Barry SOETORO to Barack Hussein Obama II. Absent of any document to show the legal process of a name change within the U.S., it is likely that the man sitting in the Oval Office is, in fact, Barry SOETORO.

The above would also serve to explain the discrepancies with his social security number and region of issuance, a matter we are very familiar with in our capacity as licensed investigators. The reasons we have seen published concerning the allegations of the association of multiple social security numbers with Barry SOETORO and Barack Hussein OBAMA has always bothered us, but not necessarily for the reasons often published. After careful and extensive analysis, it appears that many of the numbers and name variations associated with Obama are what we would describe as “database chaff.” It is not uncommon for database repositories to erroneously associate different numbers, addresses and sometimes names to an individual. The reasons for this are many and beyond the scope of this article, but it happens.

Accordingly, an investigator is well advised not to take the information obtained from a proprietary database at face value without first analyzing the information, tossing out the chaff and concentrating on the rest, which we have done. Additionally, we have found and concur with others on this matter that the social security number associated with Obama that was issued from the SSA region in Connecticut is troublesome, but again, not necessarily for the reasons as publicly stated by others.

As we have been investigating this matter for some time (see our investigative report 1 and report 2 in PDF format for important background information), it has become apparent that at some point, the individual known as Barry SOETORO began using the name Barack Hussein Obama II. Based on our investigative findings, it was at about this same time period that the Connecticut issuance of the social security number appeared and became “attached” to the name Barack Hussein Obama. It can then be reasonably reconciled that Barry SOETORO became Barack Hussein Obama while he was a young man in New York following his mysterious trip to Pakistan on a passport that was likely not issued by the U.S.

Trump’s curious statements

As long-time investigators dealing with large corporations, we have the distinct advantage of knowing other professionals in the industry. Although we have had no contact with Mr. Trump’s investigators nor are we connected in any manner to Mr. Trump’s organization, team or efforts, we are aware of the identity of at least one who is actively working on the Obama birth certificate mystery. We are also familiar with that investigator’s associates and their areas of inquiry, so we have a fairly good understanding of what is taking place behind the scenes – and there is plenty taking place behind the scenes.

NOTE: We will be talking about this in depth on the upcoming episode of CFP Radio’s “The Hagmann & Hagmann Report” on 8-10pm EST, Saturday, 9 April 2011. Program details follow this report.

In advance of that show, however, we should address two rather curious statements made by Mr. Trump during one recent interview. When talking about his investigators in Hawaii who are looking into Obama’s birth certificate issue, he stated that “you wouldn’t believe what they’re finding.” Mr. Trump also stated that in his experience on Wall Street, he is familiar with frauds of all types, and has seen some very sophisticated frauds over the years. Well, we do have a very good idea of what is being found or verified as having been scrubbed from the records.

In our investigation, we found that the scrubbing and altering of records pertaining to Obama began well before he became an Illinois state senator in the 1996 election cycle. The “scrubbing” or alteration of records did not begin or end with Obama, but also extended to his mother and other associates as well. In fact, a very large and extremely relevant part of the investigation of Barry SOETORO, or Barack Hussein Obama II as he is known, revolves around his parents, step father, and grandparents. and extends from the U.S. mainland to Hawaii and other points across the globe.

Meteoric rise to power was well planned

To understand how a virtually unknown politician from Illinois could rise to occupy the most powerful position in the free world in less than a decade after he became a state senator, one must take a few steps backward to understand the complete picture, and that Obama was selected long before he was elected to become president. Problems with his background were numerous, however, including but not limited to his parental lineage and place of birth. These problems became apparent through a private vetting process by his own handlers, or those who are known as the “power elite” in the latter half of the last century. His handlers were and are globalists of the highest order, extending from George Soros to those above him on the proverbial pyramid capstone of globalists.

The globalists had direct and indirect ties to the Dunham family and in particular, Obama’s mother. Consider, for example, that Peter F. Geithner (father of Obama’s Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner), worked for the Ford Foundation and oversaw the work of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, while she was developing “microfinance programs” in Indonesia. In brief, Obama’s mother set up a large loan system in Indonesia akin to the savings and loan structure of the 1970s and 1980s. To gain a better understanding of her activities in finance, despite her background in anthropology, recall the BCCI scandal of the late 1970s. In fact, some of the same “players” who existed then continue to exist in Obama’s circles.

Our investigation into her activities and those close to Obama are continuing and will be the subject of a separate article, including how Obama as president fits into the communist China agenda in terms of global finance. Meanwhile, it’s important to take a few more steps backward in history to understand that the scrubbing of inconvenient records is not new.

Fast Rewind: Senator Joe McCarthy & the relevance to today

The majority of Americans alive today do not recall the WW II postwar era beyond the revised history contained in textbooks that rarely reflect the truth of that time. Today’s well-coiffed but intellectually deficient anchors who deliver the news to ordinary Americans know little to nothing of the gritty reality of the origins of the “cold war” between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union, and the infiltration of communist agents into American government. It is that very infiltration that has paved the way for Obama.

Mention, however, the name of former Senator Joe McCarthy and watch as they recoil in disgust, having been taught that the inquiries of Senator Joe McCarthy is a black chapter in the history books of America. Since the 9/11 attacks, some of these news anchors and pundits have actually described the vetting of Muslims for sensitive positions in the U.S. as a throwback to “McCarthyism,” while few actually using that term know the true history of communist infiltration in key government positions in the postwar era.

The truth is that communist infiltration of and through the U.S. government, particularly the State Department, was and remains a legitimate threat to America. A 106-page confidential memo dated 3 August 1946, written by State Department official Samuel Klaus, detailed the alarming levels of communist infiltration into American government. It was that memo that served as the basis of Senator Joe McCarthy launching an investigation into the threat to America from within. It was through the efforts of McCarthy that a Senate subcommittee chaired by Senator Millard Tydings requested and eventually received a copy of that memo.

As noted by M. Stanton Evans, author of Blacklisted by History, that memo would mysteriously vanish from our nation’s records. Mr. Evans notes that this historic memo is not in the legislative panel file of the Tydings panel, located in the National Archives of the U.S., and was also removed from the files of Samuel Klaus, the author of the memo, from the National Archives in March of 1993, nearly a half century after it was issued.

As painstakingly revealed by M. Stanton Evans in his extensive work Blacklisted by History, important documentation well beyond the Klaus memo relevant to exposing the level of communist infiltration into the U.S. government is not limited to government sources such as the National Archive, but also to private data sources and repositories. He lists a number of instances where records were scrubbed and consequently, created a much different and much less accurate picture of that era of U.S. history.

This topic is as relevant today as it was during the time of Senator Joe McCarty, if not even more relevant. One only has to look at the reported communist, Marxist and socialist ties in Obama’s lineage and inner circle to understand the impact of missing records.

One would do well to use the voluminous work of M. Stanton Evans as a template to understand how Americans have been deliberately misled by the media and some members of our own government into believing that the communist and socialist objectives, launched in the postwar era, have led to where we find ourselves today.

The removal of the Klaus memo from his file in March of 1993 was as deliberate as the refusal of government officials, complicit with the media moguls of today to address the lack of bona fides of Barack Hussein Obama. In fact, one could consider them an extension of the same.

What it all means

Based on investigative findings that are not discussed in the media, it would appear that the selection and election of Barack Hussein Obama was indeed the greatest scam ever pulled off against the American people. The above provides just a small portion of the critical issues surrounding Obama’s eligibility, identity and his place in U.S. and world history. The story is much larger than a single piece of paper, but that paper, if properly authenticated, will serve as the thread that will unravel the larger tangled web of the Obama legend.

To those who have just awakened to the constitutional crisis we are facing at the hands of this president, we’d like to say once again, “welcome to the party, pal.”

Douglas J. Hagmann & his son, Joseph Hagmann, both investigators, researchers and contributors to Canada Free Press, host a weekly radio program on CFP Radio called The Hagmann & Hagmann Report

, broadcast live every Saturday from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET. In it’s fifth week, the program has gained in popularity, and has become one of the ten most popular radio shows on the BlogTalk Radio platform. This week’s program will be providing additional details about the problems with Obama’s eligibility to occupy the White House.


Springs man’s claim to have Obama records starts buzz

A Colorado Springs “birther,” retired Air Force Col. Gregory Hollister, has Internet blogs abuzz with what may be an illegal foray into an online Social Security data base and how he obtained a copy of President Barack Obama’s draft registration from 1980.

“Col. Greg Hollister, USAF (Ret.) contacted the Selective Service, falsely impersonated President Obama, improperly registered his own address as President Obama’s address, and by this false impersonation and identity theft he managed to obtain a duplicate registration acknowledgement card with President Obama’s Selective Service information on it,” a blogger posted on last week. “This may violate several federal criminal statutes, and apparently caused the federal record of President Obama’s address with the Selective Service to be altered to show that he lives in Colorado Springs, CO.”

Hollister said Tuesday a private investigator, Susan Daniels of Ohio, gave him what is purported to be the president’s Social Security number. He then accessed the Social Security Number Verification Service to find out to whom it was issued and to access Selective Service documents.

The site allows registered users to verify names and Social Security numbers for employment purposes and warns that using it under false pretenses is a violation of federal law.

“According to the Social Security Administration, that number was never issued,” said Hollister, who challenged whether the president is an American citizen in a lawsuit the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Jan. 18 without requiring a response from the White House.
However, that’s the Social Security number that appears on the Selective Service documents Hollister obtained.

Hollister and others in the birther movement claim Obama was born in either Kenya or Indonesia and that his birth certificate showing he was born in Honolulu in 1961 is a forgery.

Being born outside the U.S. makes him ineligible to be president, they claim, because the Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen.

Hollister said the Social Security number on what he says is Obama’s draft registration begins with the numbers 042, which would be issued to someone born in Connecticut, not Hawaii.

Last week, California attorney Orly Taitz, who has led the legal challenges to Obama’s citizenship, filed an amended complaint in her latest lawsuit demanding Obama’s Social Security records, attaching as an exhibit the draft registration mailed to an address in Colorado Springs, according to the Reality Check Radio Blog.

It is unknown if the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Denver is investigating Hollister’s use of the data bases and obtaining Obama’s draft records.

Hollister denied breaking any laws.

“I was very meticulous and made sure everything I did was compliant with the law,” Hollister said, noting that he sent Obama an 1099 tax form.

A 1099 is an IRS income reporting form for independent contractors and free-lancers. Hollister did not explain how sending that to Obama complies with federal laws on the use of Social Security data.

Daniels said her doubts about Obama’s citizenship have only been reinforced by what Hollister found out.

Hollister said he started questioning Obama’s citizenship because as a retired Air Force officer he is subject to recall to active duty until he dies and he needs to be sure that Obama has the authority to give those orders.

20 thoughts on “The unraveling of Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama II”

  1. Do NOT dismiss the ramifications of 18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381 and it’s prohibitions against those guilty of treason from holding “Any office under the US”

  2. No matter how much they find on Obongo, the leftards will break EVERY rule in the Constitution to keep him (IT) in office.
    When’s the last time you can remember that a Vice- President has not been blasted by the Media? I can’t remember !! Isn’t strange that Biden never gets bad coverage? That,in itself,should wake some of the Sheeple up.

  3. Now that Donald Trump is making the kind of waves that should have been made during the run-up to the 2008 Election by our so called Press and by any or all of the Republican Candidates, I must confess that I have become a “Trump Cheerleader.” I’ve maintained from early 2008, that Obama was and is a Fraud. Not in the sense that I questioned whether or not he was born in Hawaii ….. but more on the lines that I thought he was an empty suit portraying himself as some super intelligent and super competent Executive. It didn’t take me long to confirm my thinking just by looking at who his friends were and his public response to sitting in Wright’s racist Trinity Church for 20 years. My conclusion then and now is that BHO is an arrogant, petulant, super slick lying elixir salesman.

    As to the Birth Certificate ….. I always wondered why he just didn’t show the darned thing to get this inconvenient matter out of the way. So from that point of view, I don’t think I was considered a so-called Birther. What I have been all along [and I’ve heard this label of late] is a “Proofer.” – I don’t know much about this Guy that is now our President. But what I do know he is hiding a whole lot more than his Birth Certificate. “Promising to be the most transparent president in history, Barack Hussein Obama is the most deliberately opaque president who has withheld many more records than his birth certificate. Not only has he withheld his records, he has fought to keep them hidden from public view, amassing legal fees that some claim to exceed a million dollars of his own money, and perhaps twice that amount if pro-bono and other legal work is counted.” (This quote from a Canada Free Press Article)
    Can anyone tell me why he is unwilling to produce or answer the following?
    Where are the legal documents relative to his name change from Soetero
    Why multiple Social Security Numbers
    Where are his Passport Records
    What are his SAT and LSAT Scores
    What is his IQ
    Where are the Occidental College Records
    Where are the Columbia Records
    Where are the Harvard Records
    Where are his records and clients list from his Law Firm
    Has his Selective Service Registration been doctored
    Who were his benefactors while at Columbia and Harvard
    Where are his Medical Records
    Why did he give up his Law License
    Where did he disappear to on that Sunday Morning

    Errol Phillips

  4. Rush Limbaugh

    CALLER: Hey, Rush, it’s an honor to speak with you. I love you, my family loves you, and you’re the foundation of everything that I am.

    RUSH: Whoa! Thank you very much, sir.

    CALLER: You’re welcome. I’m well educated, well researched. One of the questions I have, something that really frustrates me, is this “smoke screen” of Obama’s birth. Everybody’s screaming about his birth certificate, and all these other documents — and, you know, it’s all irrelevant. His father was a loyal British subject at the time of his birth, and his mother was too young to qualify. It’s documented fact. So I don’t know why everybody is running around trying to prove anything. Any document he puts forward is a fraudulent document.

    RUSH: Well, I’ll tell you why it’s important. There are two reasons why it’s important. Number one, he’s got a grandmother or aunt in Kenya who said she saw him born there. That’s number one. Number two, aside from all of that, what Donald Trump is really doing — and as I pointed out yesterday — is Donald Trump is providing a lesson on how to beat Barack Obama. Donald Trump is showing that the way to do that is you go after these people. Not just Obama. You go after the left. You go after the Democrat Party. You don’t get timid, you don’t act defensive and you don’t act afraid. You just go after them.

    Look at poor old Meredith Vieira. She had no idea what to do with Trump. So, you may look at what Trump’s doing as an expose of the birth certificate. I look at it as a lot more. There’s a lot more to what Trump is accomplishing here than just questions about Obama’s birth.

    CALLER: (silence)

    RUSH: I don’t think he really loved me that much, Snerdley. I think you got snookered. I think that was a seminar caller. I think you got taken in because you love me like that, so anybody telling you that they love me like that, you fell for it. You just got scammed, see? But I didn’t get scammed. I didn’t get scammed. (interruption) Right. (interruption) Weeeell, that’s all right. These kinds of things happen but, you know, that’s why I’m here and you’re on the other side of the glass screening the calls.


    RUSH: Back to this birther business for just a second. The Department of Health in Hawaii has verified that Obama’s certificate of live birth is authentic, but it’s not a birth certificate. In addition, one of Obama’s relatives, aunt or grandmother, swears that he was born in Kenya. She saw it. She was there at the birth. Now, Trump’s doing a lot of things, but what Trump’s doing is giving a road map here. He’s showing the Republican Party how to deal with Obama, how to deal with the Democrat Party at large. Now, even though the Department of Health in Hawaii has verified that Obama’s certificate of live birth is authentic, the incredible thing here is that more than two years into Obama’s regime more than 40% of the population still question whether he’s actually an American or not. And don’t think that it’s all because of the birth certificate.

    Folks, the reason so many people are questioning whether or not Obama is American is because of what he has said and what he has done. Americans do not run around the world and apologize for their country. Americans do not support and implement policies that cause people to lose their jobs. Americans do not implement policies that decrease the standard of living. Americans do not institute policies that cause us to be more dependent on foreign oil. So all this talk about the birth certificate, the lack of one that’s causing people to question where Obama’s from, it’s not just that. Don’t doubt me. It’s what he’s done. It’s his agenda. It’s his policies. If we’re gonna sit around and discuss “Do you think Obama’s an American?” I don’t even care about the birth certificate part of it. I want to focus more on his policies in terms of answering and dealing with that question.


  5. Great posts, Sheik (thanks for covering this issue), and if I may add to the discussion, we were watching Hannity briefly discuss Trump and the BC on Thursday evening’s show. When it came down to the segment with his so-called “great American panel”, he and his three guests reluctantly waded into this discussion but did so since Trump has come onto the presidential scene and was making news with this. As they did, I listened with incredulity when Hannity stated, “Well, I assume he was born in this country”. At that point, I felt he lost all credibility as a newsman, journalist and talk show host. I was thinking how he left no stone unturned prior to the 2008 election in exposing Obama’s ties to Tony Rezko, Jeremiah Wright, Wright’s church, as well as his sordid past. Hannity was relentless in digging dirt on Obama and was arguably a key factor in making the public aware (the non-Kool Aid drinkers, that is) of who Obama’s buddies were and how much of a taqiyya liar Obama was then (and of course still is today).

    Fast forward 2½ years later and this same Hannity essentially now says he takes Obama at his word that he’s a citizen with no proof to back it up. His journalistic integrity is now out the window – not that it hadn’t been waning over the last couple years – it had. But by his naive and thoughtless comment (not a whole like evasively so like Rush), he was willing to take something on blind faith he would have not done in the past. He was only too happy to throw his proverbial football at the end of the show to escape something you could see by his mannerisms and facial expressions that he didn’t want to touch in the final 10 minutes of Thursday evening’s broadcast.

    Unfortunately, I can’t locate a transcript of the discussion the so-called “great American panel” at the Hannity section of the Fox site but if someone knows of it somewhere, perhaps they can post here and link to it.

    It’s no secret that prior to Trump coming on the scene that Hannity’s silence on Obama’s ineligibility was deafening in large part due to Roger Ailes and Ruppert Murdoch at Fox making sure the Fox crew stays hush-hush on it. But with the lame brain media unable to any longer forcibly keep the discussion on this matter muted, Hannity had a golden chance to step up to the plate and publicly demonstrate his patriotism and fealty to the Constitution. If nothing else, he could have just spilt the beens and “let it all hang out”, even if it meant losing his job. And if it did, he would be viewed by patriots across America as, as he calls it, “a great American”. He’s set financially with his high six figure salary so he should have just blurted the truth out and let the chips fall where they may. Sadly, he didn’t do so and sadly, he’s going the way of irrelevancy as many others are. Rush may hang around a while longer than the rest of the talking heads because of his astronomically high ratings as the king of conservative talk shows but if he follows the course of Hannity and others who want to continue sweeping the eligibility issue under the rug, it will eventually catch up to him as well.

    Also, great montages of Obama on this page; if only we can translate them into reality.

  6. Sheik Yer Mami, now that my investigation has led me to your site, I’m going to be keeping an eye on you… ;?)

    And, btw, thank you for this article.

    It has long frustrated me that conservative politicians and media people have given Obama a pass on the issue of proof. It infuriates me that all of the major conservative candidates have avoided this issue because they do not want to attract negative fire from the main stream media. When asked about it, they shuffle and say “I think he was born in Hawii… but, … ummmm, uh…, I’m focused on other matters..” They are fearful that getting into a fight with the left wing media will cause them to rage, and cost them votes, reducing their chances, politically, so I was particularly glad when Donald Trump weighed in on this issue. I am very anxious to see how this develops.

    As for Fox, it’s too bad they have lost Glenn Beck, I have no one to go there to watch. Bill O’Reilly is very weak tea, I can’t really watch the guy, he’s one of those opinionated egomaniacs that defends Obama on this issue, and it ticks me off. He’ll fade as the real issues get sorted out .. his star is waning … the same goes for Sean Hannity. When it was Hannity and Colmes, Sean was much better off because Alan was so liberally dumb that he made Hannity look like George Washington .. now that Colmes is gone, Hannity’s intellect is about as appealing as Pee Wee Herman in a boxing ring.. he has lost his relevance, he’s just a average, sorta conservative media guy, his wit and wisdom are only ankle deep. Also, I don’t personally like the football gag and all the crappy liberals on the so called “Great American Panel”. I quickly grew tired of his soup. Finally, I’m afraid Rush will also wane, I find it painful to listen to him, he spends a lot of time blathering and isn’t too sharply focused on anything, I like Mark Levin much better, he’s clearly focused on issues and isn’t an egomaniac, unfortunately, he comes across as kinda withdrawn and cranky.

    American patriot!

  7. “the greatest scam ever pulled off against the American people” is
    the 9/11 Treason. This is, then, the second biggest. Impeachable.

  8. If there is a discrepency about the presidents true birthplace, records could be check with the vital statistics office in Honolulu, Hawaii. I’m sure this was checked before Obama ran for office of president, otherwise, how could he even run? Then again, our government isn’t always honest are they?

    I think Obama is who he says he is and those out to discredit him are just predudice; plain and simple.

  9. Irene,

    Yes yes, I’m sure all this suspicion is completely unfounded and Obama is just what he claims to be.

    Anyone who has the slightest doubt about his past (despite the enormous amount of evidence that so many of his records have gone AWOL), is just a racist bigot who doesn’t like the idea of a black President.

    Similarly, anyone who criticises Islam and claims that it is not really a Religion of Peace, is just a racist (even though Islam isn’t a race!) bigot.

    So there!

  10. Damn !!! I thought I had posted this yesterday !

    Friday, July 08, 2011 A.D.
    Breaking: New Developments in Social Security Number Lawsuit |

    Why did the Social Security Administration exceed its obligations in responding to a FOIA request from Dr. Orly Taitz in this instance? (Jul. 5, 2011)

  11. Damn !!! I thought I had posted this yesterday !

    Friday, July 08, 2011 A.D.
    by Sharon Rondeau

    Why did the Social Security Administration exceed its obligations in responding to a FOIA request from Dr. Orly Taitz in this instance? (Jul. 5, 2011)

  12. Damn !!! I thought I had posted this yesterday !!!

    Friday, July 08, 2011 A.D.
    by Sharon Rondeau.
    Why did the Social Security Administration exceed its obligations in responding to a FOIA request from Dr. Orly Taitz in this instance? (Jul. 5, 2011)

  13. Sorry about posting three times !
    Sorry about posting three times !
    Sorry about posting three times !

    Nothing showed each time I posted last night !


    I forward this as received, without comment.

    Yes, he told us in advance what he planned to do. Few were listening.

    The following is a narrative taken from a 2008 Sunday morning televised “Meet The Press’.

    From Sunday’s 07 Sept. 2008 11:48:04 EST, Televised “Meet the Press” THE THEN Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag.

    General Bill Ginn’ USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn’t follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.

    The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171…

    During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, “Stand and Face It”.


    ‘Senator’Obama replied:

    “As I’ve said about the flag pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides”.. “There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression..” “The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing.”


    Obama continued: “The National Anthem should be ‘swapped’ for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song ‘I’d Like To Teach the World To Sing’. If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as ‘redesign’ our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of warring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails – – – perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments ……”
    When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts. We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past”.

    “Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path..My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country’s First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America ”

    WHAAAAAAAT, the Hell is that???

    Yes, you read it right.

    I, for one, am speechless!!!

    Dale Lindsborg , Washington Post


    The Obamster brings out the best in people:

    Village Voice’s Michael Feingold: Kill the Rich, Seize Their Property

    Looks like Michael Feingold is getting tired of spitting up moonbattery in the sickening Village Voice. He’s auditioning for a position as Barack Hussein Obama’s Revenue Enhancement Czar:

    Feingold assures us that this isn’t an incitement to action. He just wants the rich to know that when they are murdered for their property as so often happens in countries that degenerate into collectivism, they will deserve it because of the “greed” they demonstrate by not wanting their property seized.

    Dana Loesch points out that the vast majority of the rich in America got that way through hard work, not inheritance, and that they pay far more than the fair share that commies keep bleating about. The top 5% of earners pay 58% of federal taxes; the bottom 50% pay <3%.

    But if people don’t have the moral sense to understand that theft is wrong even when it’s done through the government, they aren’t likely to be swayed by such esoteric arguments. Shovel off the nuance and liberal economics amounts to a very simple message: “They’ve got it; we want it; let’s take it.” How do you argue with thugs incapable of thinking beyond this level?

    On a tip from GoY.

Comments are closed.