A healthy society would not tolerate the attempt to regulate debates. And the rules in practice discriminate against conservatives, since they tend to believe in free speech, while the Left seems far more minded to close it down.–Andrew Bolt
Islamic extremists set up Sharia law controlled zones in British cities
Islamic excremists have launched a poster campaign across the UK proclaiming areas where Sharia law enforcement zones have been set up. Â Communities have been bombarded with the posters, which read: ‘You are entering a Sharia-controlled zone â€“ Islamic rules enforced.’ (Daily Mail)
This one almost defies belief. It’s an excerpt from an interview on the Today programme with Lars Gule, described as a Norwegian philosopher. In fact Lars Gule is a convicted terrorist. Here’s his Wikipedia entry:
In 1977 Lars Gule was arrested in Beirut, Lebanon for carrying explosives, intended for an armed attack in Israel. The explosives were meant for use in an action on behalf of Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) in an operation timed to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. He was convicted to half a year in prison in Lebanon for illegal possession of a weapon (i.e. explosives), but was not convicted on terrorism charges.
More detail from this page:
In 1977 Lars Gule embarked on a mission to bomb a hotel where certain Israeli citizens were scheduled to meet. His mission was foiled by Lebanese Customs officials who caught Gule attempting to board a flight with 800 grams of explosives in his possession. Gule was convicted, sentenced to prison, and labeled “Norway’s first international terrorist. ”
When caught by Customs officials in Lebanon, Gule at first lied and claimed that he was not aware that he was carrying the explosives found hidden inside some books in his luggage. He claimed that he was given the books by some people he had met in Beirut. Only after his arrest did Gule confess to the truth.
Gule admitted to having spent 15 to 20 hours being trained by a terrorist organization on weaponry and sabotage tactics in preparation for this mission. The organization purportedly asked Gule to carry out the task as a “propaganda-action” to mark the 10-year anniversary of the 1967 war. They informed him that the target of the action was a hotel used as a conference center and meeting place by certain Israelis.
When interviewed afterwards, Gule said he was chosen for the operation because it was easier for an apparent European tourist to smuggle explosives across the border and confessed to being fully aware of the purpose of his mission. Gule added that it was up to him to see how well he could place the bomb, however the most important objective was to create an explosion. Gule stated that he did not regret participating in the planned terrorist act. He said that, while he once believed that it was possible to create a societal revolt without violence, he now believed that the use of weapons is needed in order to cure injustices because no one gives up his rights without a fight.
Although the crime Gule committed also violated Norwegian law, Norway chose not to prosecute Gule upon his return because he had already served out a sentence in Lebanon. Gule did not appear repentant or grateful. At the time he commented that he had very little respect for the Norwegian legal system and didn’t care what action they took so long as it didn’t result in his having to spend time in prison.
Lars Gule currently writes about terrorism. In an article headlined “What creates terrorists? Can terrorism be fought? ” Gule asserts that it is the motivation behind an act that decides if it should be labelled as terrorism.
This is not a surprising position for a convicted terrorist to take. Gule appears to have developed reasoning elastic enough to make his past crime more palatable to his followers.
Most amazing of all, though, the BBC interviewer disputes the existence of Muslim no-go areas and Lars Gule happily concurs that this is some kind of paranoid ultra-right conspiracy theory.
“This is standard beliefs (sic) among the xenophobes and islamophobes on the internet…This shows some of the warped sense of reality that is operating in this environment.” Lars Gule
Here’s a Daily Telegraph story in which Bishop Nazar-Ali warns of Muslim no-go areas in Britain.
Islamic extremists have created “no-go” areas across Britain where it is too dangerous for non-Muslims to enter, one of the Church of England’s most senior bishops warns today.
The Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester and the Church’s only Asian bishop, says that people of a different race or faith face physical attack if they live or work in communities dominated by a strict Muslim ideology.
Others agreed with him.
…the Bishop’s concerns are shared by other members of the General Synod.
The Rt Rev Nicholas Reade, the Bishop of Blackburn, which has a large Muslim community, said that it was increasingly difficult for Christians to share their faith in areas where there was a high proportion of immigrants of other faiths.
…Last night, Mr Davis said: “Bishop Nazir-Ali has drawn attention to a deeply serious problem. The Government’s confused and counter-productive approach risks creating a number of closed societies instead of one open, cohesive one. It generates the risk of encouraging radicalisation and creating home-grown terrorism.”
Are these people all paranoid, far-right xenophobes?
The political elite in the UK are reappraising the threat from far-right groups over here after the murderous rampage which transpired in Norway last week. Leftwing ,liberal and Islamic groups are demanding that in the interest of peace and harmony that they be proscribed. But hang on as much as I find groups on the far right of the political spectrum odious, I do have to question why the very groups who cite human rights abuses when the government looks at the far left and radical Islamist groups, are demanding the government follows a policy which they have spent the last 20 to 30 years fighting as an attack on free speech and human rights. Funny enough the idiot behind the attacks blamed how immigrants to the West (read Muslims) are afforded more human rights than the indigenous peoples. So does he have a point? Are Immigrants to the West afforded more rights than the people who pay the bills? Here are three stories from this week which I feel highlight how abusing the Human rights system in place is the biggest recruiting sergeant for the far-right:
Human rights abuse 1
Sheikh Raed SalahÂ was put on the persona non grata list by the Home Secretary Theresa May for his bigoted views. Yet he still came to the Uk (shows you how good our border staff are) and managed to give 3 speeches before the Old bill arrested him on the 28th June. Instead of deporting his racist arse back to Israel. He is fighting to remain in the country and because he has human rights he not only is still here, but and I quote but won’t have his day in court until September. Get that a nasty piece of work who we don’t want in the country and we have to fight tooth and nail in which to try and kick him out. An act which will have taken over 3 months by September and cost the taxpayer bloody thousands.
Human rights abuse 2
Last yearÂ the Secretary Theresa May tried to close the door which was wedged open by the previous labour government when they came to power in 1997 by changing the rules on bringing foreign spouses to the UK. Instead of the free for all which has seen millions relocate to the Uk. She changed the rule book which stipulated that all foreign spouses to be able to speak English. Hey its a first step and lets be serious is pretty common sence. Well what do you know? Along comes 54 year old Mrs Rashida Chapti who has been married for 37 years to a man who has lived in India all that time and who is an Indian national, he is 57 years of age and now she wants to bring him over (Gee at 57 years of age I wonder why?) However he is unable to speak or read English. She has gone to the courts to contest the ban on him coming over and they (the courts) have deemed that requiring Immigrants to speak English in England is actually against their human rights. Get that we cannot keep out anybody who wishes to move here.
Human rights abuse 3
Two German convertsÂ to Islam were arrested for terrorism offences at Dover and today in Court they refused to stand because they deemed it against their Islamic faith and the court let them. Now lets look at this from another angle, If a Christian refused to stand in court in an Islamic country, would they be allowed to do so? Would they bollocks. They’ll be on their Knees praying to Allah as Big Mohamed unzips his trousers in which to show them how to really respect the Judge in an Islamic country. So much for their human rights there then.
Those three incidents have transpired this week, there are hundreds more like them. It is pathetic arguments of human rights abuses which allows these people to stick two fingers up at the law abiding British taxpayer and which in turn causes people to gravitate to the far right. Instead of trying to clamp down on members of the far-right with a steel toe capped jack boot. How about the government instead attack the causes of why these people feel disfranchised by the mainstream political parties which in turn sees them becoming racists and bigots in which to try and save their country. Human rights indeed.