Religion of Hijackers

 A steaming pile of Islam promo in the Telegraph (thanks to Mullah)

Hoodlums who happen to be Muslim have no respect for Islam

Are there still any Muslim females in Australia who are not lawyers and “human rights activists?” Randa Abdel-Fattah and Mariam Veiszadeh are both lawyers working in Sydney. Both are “devout Muslims”. In typical fashion, they pull all the registers from ‘nothing to do with Islam’ to ‘media to blame for reporting about Muslims’.

Fed up: Randa Abdel-Fattah is a lawyer, author and human rights activist. 

Mariam Veiszadeh is a lawyer and Muslim community advocate.

Being what they are, The Telegraph finds it necessary to give them a soapbox and a chance to mix us a taqiyya cocktail with some extra strength sleeping pills.  Apart from the usual herbs & spices like “The Muslim community is as diverse and eclectic”- we get this:

Islam is not Islam: “The majority of Muslims are fed up with a minority who are content to manufacture ugly interpretations of Islam”-

sharia is not sharia: …”far removed from the compassionate and just jurisprudential legacy we have inherited.”-  

 Sharia barely implemented: (except when its implemented  compassion goes out the window, instantly.)

Its about time the press practices censorship, because  both are “fed up with the media highlighting every criminal or stupid act by somebody who happens to be Muslim”.

Take your Valium, infidel: As Muslim women, as lawyers, as Australians, we have this message: there is no fundamental or intrinsic incompatibility between Islam and democracy.

We beg to differ. You are religiously obligated to lie, you miserable twits. Its called taqiyya.*

THE recent case of the Muslim men accused of lashing another Muslim in his home is still to be decided by the courts but early reports suggest that Islam was once again hijacked and used as justification for criminal behaviour.

As lawyers and as Muslims, we find it reprehensible when Islamic jurisprudence is appropriated by backyard thugs whose actions show an utter contempt and arrogant disdain for the ethical, moral and reasonable principles that underlie Islamic theology.

Please tell us more.  After years of studying Koran, sira & hadith we (still) couldn’t find ethics or morals in Islamic theology. We’re dying to know, that’s only ‘reasonable’, is it not?

“Tiny minority of excremists”

The majority of Muslims are fed up with a minority who are content to manufacture ugly interpretations of Islam, which are far removed from the compassionate and just jurisprudential legacy we have inherited. Unfortunately, we live in a society where very few people make a distinction between the teachings of a faith and the myriad interpretations and distortions such teachings can produce.

(Ever tried to take your Islam straight up, honey-pie?)

The media is to blame for Muslim crime:

We are also fed up with the media highlighting every criminal or stupid act by somebody who happens to be Muslim. There are more than 300,000 Muslims in Australia and while the vast majority are law-abiding, they stand accused alongside every Muslim who has a run-in with the law. The media attention is disproportionate, leaving the grossly unfair impression that the majority of Muslims are on the wrong side of the law.

RELATED COVERAGE

The Muslim community is as diverse and eclectic as any community which broadly falls under a religious category and individual actions should not be extrapolated to a judgment about an entire faith community.

For every outrageous false claim made by a Muslim in the name of Islam, whether to justify misogyny, brutality or ideological divisions, there are countless Muslims – lay people, scholars, academics, community workers, activists, professionals, students – countering such ugliness.

Really? Where are they?

We are not here to defend badly behaved Muslims. To such Muslims we say you should be held to account if necessary.

Only if necessary? And don’t badly behaved Muslims need lawyers?

As Muslim women, as lawyers, as Australians, we have this message: there is no fundamental or intrinsic incompatibility between Islam and democracy.

We beg to differ. Now comes the kicker:

We also say this: fears about the criminal code of sharia having a place in Australia are generated by sensationalist scaremongering. The criminal code is barely implemented in Muslim majority countries so any such debate is a moot point. That some might seek to justify their behaviour on the basis of sharia does not mean their actions are a true reflection of sharia law or that sharia law is coming to Australia. To be a good Muslim and a good Australian are one and the same thing. (Gimme a break!)  A life devoted to Islam’s ethical and moral principles means a person will strive to have integrity, be law-abiding and embrace civic responsibilities.

A steaming pile of taqiqqa if I ever seen one. Are these dames seriously claiming Iran, Sowdi Barbaria and dozens of other Muslim hell-holes are not ruled by sharia?

Let us name criminal behaviour for what it is and not grace it with any religious labels.

Islam is a criminal organization. Just don’t talk about it, kafir. Know your place!

* Can a devout Muslim be a loyal Australian?

Theologically, no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia .Religiously, no. Because the only religion accepted by his Allah is Islam (Koran, 2:256)Scripturally, no. Because his allegiance is to  Islam and the Koran.

Geographically, no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially, no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically, no. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of  non-Muslims.

Domestically, no. Because he is instructed to marry up to four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Koran 4:34).

Intellectually, no. Because he cannot accept the Western Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically, no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Koran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually, no. Because when we declare “one nation under God,” our God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as heavenly father, nor is he ever called Love in the Koran’s 99 excellent names.”

Therefore after much study and deliberation …. perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both “good” Muslims and good Australians.

Call it what you wish ….. it’s still the truth.

The religious war is bigger and more complex than most Australians currently know or understand.

And once again, just to restore sanity:

Fitzgerald’s Prayer

Stop, for god’s sake stop, importing trouble—and Muslim immigrants, as a whole, necessarily mean trouble, in all lands where the political and legal institutions, and social arrangements, are flatly contradicted by the Shari’a. Muslims are obligated to change or tear down those institutions, in order to remove all “obstacles to Islam.” It is not special or individual malice that prompts that attitude. That is their duty, a central duty. Why not come to fully and soberly understand that duty, and out of a minimal sense of self-preservation, cease to import those into our lands (America, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and every other place that has so generously admitted, under a twisted definitiion of “refugees,” people who do not, and can not, wish our ways or institutions or constitutions well.

Hugh Fitzgerald

6 thoughts on “Religion of Hijackers”

  1. Sheik – thanks for bringing this to my attention (I don’t usually read the Telegraph so I don’t come across these things, which is probably good for my blood pressure).

    I wonder who in the Ummah selected these two sweetly-smiling creatures to warble their lies to the kuffar? One non-hijabbed, one wearing the Slave Hood in its mildest and most deceptively nun’s-wimple-resembling style.

    I don’t know about anyone else but I get a really bad vibe from the condescending smiles pasted on the faces of these creatures…the smile on the face of the tiger.

Comments are closed.