Germany Brings out the Gestapo Against "Islamophobia"

Did Erdoclown beat up Merkel during her visit to Turkey or did he spike her drink?

 Stifling debate to criminalize all criticism of a genocidal Arabian ideology?

“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil. God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak, not to act is to act.”

Dietrich Bonhoeffer ~

 Its happening now, in Germany of all places. The leftarded SPIEGEL is totally in the bag:

German Intelligence to Spy on…’Islamophobes?’

“Hatred of Muslims is enough to endanger freedom of religion and international understanding.” Read More »

Officials from the BfV, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, will discuss the country’s increasingly vocal Islamophobe scene at a meeting on Thursday. There have been calls to put right-wing populist and anti-Muslim groups under increased surveillance.

Authorities Debate Surveillance of Islamophobes

Officials in Germany will meet tomorrow to decide whether right wing groups who are vocally critical of Islam– so-called “Islamophobes”– will be placed under domestic intelligence agency scrutiny alongside other “extremists”.

“Islamophobes” live dangerously:

The German daily newspaper Der Spiegel reported today that “Islamophobes” could be placed under surveillance by the BfV, the German equivalent of Britain’s MI-5 or, less precisely, our FBI.

The meeting to decide this designation will be held between “the president of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Heinz Fromm, and the agency’s leaders in the 16 German states.”

The German states of Bavaria and Hamburg have already started to view “Islamophobes” and other “right-wing populists” as extremists who pose a threat to order and security. Hamburg officials have declared they monitor a German internet web forum with the less-than-threatening name “Politically Incorrect,” though they say the site is not technically under watch by spies.

Why are German authorities looking at the site then?

An unnamed German official told Der Spiegel it was “undemocratic” and meant to “incite young people.”

An “unnamed official?” Why so coy? Why is the Spiegel so coy to name this enemy of free speech?

Der Spiegel summarized the question facing the intelligence agencies as whether:

“The hatred of Muslims is enough to endanger freedom of religion and international understanding — or whether it is a radical but legitimate expression of opinion by individual authors within the limits of the constitution.”

The German government already criminalizes political parties deemed offensive or threatening to public order. Last week, Germany outlawed what had been its largest Neo-Nazi party. The country also has stringent anti-hate speech laws on the books, which can call for serious criminal penalties.

Has the whole world fallen under some kind of Muslim spell or what??
The whole world is just giving in to the insane mass murderers?
Why does everyone just cave to the ones who promise to kill them??
I can’t get my mind wrapped around the insanity of it all.

Related links:

Sharia is the end of your Freedom. Islam is the trojan horse.

 Islam promotes and encourages the murder of apostates, infidels, Jews and Christians. Islam denies equal protections of women, subjugates women, and discriminates against non-Muslims and gays. Given that Islam is a religion, it is a legal entity under the law. For example, some religions practice human sacrifice, or animal sacrifice, and their are religions that practice acts that are clearly illegal. Islam is like these religions. The teachings and commandments of Islam make it illegal.

9 thoughts on “Germany Brings out the Gestapo Against "Islamophobia"”

  1. How to destroy a civilization
    – Building on guilt

    “We can now see that the campaign to destroy our identity had (and still has) the following components:

    – Import huge number of Labour voting Muslim immigrants.

    – Muslim immigrants are especially favoured because they are unassimilable and fast-breeding.

    – The resultant population explosion will eventually destroy the countryside and much of Britain’s heritage, again helping to erode national pride and sense of identity.

    – Give preferential cheap social housing to Muslims, while allowing the cost of commercial housing to rise astronomically. This makes finding a home and starting a family very difficult for the British working class.

    – Denigrate all British achievements and history. Brainwash students with a sense of guilt about colonialism, slavery and the British Empire and completely airbrush British achievements out of history. This will ultimately produce a nation obsessed with guilt and self-loathing.”

    Same receipt for all Western countries

    – The link is from 2010, but is aboslutely not outdated, and it gives a good background to understanding what has been going on, and what is going on today, and what still is going on tomorrow

  2. Immigration budget in France +27%

    Twentyseven percent up from one year to the next

    “To meet the elevated demands for accommodation to asylum seekers” it has been necessary to increase the asylum costs from 296 million euros, to 376 million euros in 2012 budget, according to Interior Minister Wednesday.

    And the French are realizing that what comes next is the demand that the French tighten their belts, and leave their social housing to the newcomers while they prepare to pay higher taxes. The Explosion is one step closer, according to one reader

  3. The Runymede Trust (a far left stink tank) has identified 8 components of Islamophobia:

    1) Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
    2) Islam is seen as separate and ‘other’. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.
    3) Islam is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.
    4) Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a ‘clash of civilisations’.
    5) Islam is seen as a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage.
    6) Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand.
    7) Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
    8) Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal.

    For a point-by-point response see

  4. Oh how I detest the word Islamophobe. Its a propaganda term used to silence meaningful debate on the abhorrent nature Islam and its invidious rotten core. Im not scared of Islam, I just cant stand any politico-religious cult that advocates a belief system from 7th century Arabia and all of the salivating hatred it relentlessly promulgates.

    1. The term “Islamophobia” itself was invented by the Muslim Brotherhood

      Spencer and Horowitz: The Only Thing We Have to Fear (Is Islamophobia Itself)
      On September 30, NRO published an edited version of this piece that I cowrote with David Horowitz, under the title “A Rational Fear of Islamism,” Today FrontPage has the original version:

      In recent months several reports have appeared to a generally uncritical reception in the press, which purport to expose alleged conspiracies organized by “Islamophobes” against American citizens who mean us no harm. These reports single out for condemnation a dozen prominent conservative figures (and mostly the same dozen) who have publicly criticized the misogyny, bigotry and terrorism promoted by many (but not all) Islamic institutions and religious texts.
      The term “Islamophobia” itself was invented by the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the political fountainhead of Islamic terror, having spawned al-Qaeda and created Hamas. Not coincidently, the reports themselves have been produced by Brotherhood fronts like CAIR, and jihadist apologists like the Southern Poverty Law Center. But the latest and most elaborate Islamophobia report, transparently derivative of its predecessors, has been issued by the Center for American Progress, which is a brain trust of the Democratic Party. It thus marks a disturbing development in this ugly campaign.

      On examination, the term “Islamophobia” is designed to create a modern-day thought crime, while the campaign to suppress it is an effort to abolish the First Amendment where Islam is concerned. The purpose of the suffix – phobia — is to identify any concern about troubling Islamic institutions and actions as irrational, or worse as a dangerous bigotry that should itself be feared.

      Is fear of terrorists inspired by Islam irrational? There have been 17,800 terrorist attacks carried out by Muslims in the name of Allah since 9/11. Is it unreasonable to be concerned that 30,000 shoulder-ready surface-to-air missiles have been recently gone missing in the Muslim nation of Libya, where both government and rebels the Islamic jihad against America and the West?

      Would not a reasonable person be concerned about the attacks plotted and carried out by Muslims in the United States who claim to be inspired by the Koran and who regard themselves as holy warriors in the jihad declared by Osama bin Laden and other Muslim fanatics? These Muslim attacks include the successful massacre of unarmed American soldiers at Fort Hood by Nidal Hassan, a self-declared Muslim warrior whose anti-infidel rantings were ignored by the military brass.

      These Muslim terrorists include Naser Abdo, the would-be second Fort Hood jihad mass murderer; and Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; and Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; and Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; and Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; and Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; and Naveed Haq, the jihad mass murderer at the Jewish Community Center in Seattle; and Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Ahmed Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh, who hatched a jihad plot to blow up a Manhattan synagogue; and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber; and many others.

      If the FBI and law enforcement agencies had not had serious fears of Muslim fanatics, had not been possessed by a species of “Islamophobia,” all those would-be terrorist attacks would be successful attacks and carry long lists of dead innocents – infidels – along with their names….

      There is more.

  5. German Multiculturalists Declare War on Critics of Islam

    by Soeren Kern

    October 3, 2011 at 5:00 am

    The German government is debating whether to increase surveillance of German citizens who are trying to prevent the spread of radical Islam in Germany.

    The move comes in reaction to a three-week-long smear campaign by members of the German mainstream media, who have been relentless in their efforts to discredit the so-called counter-jihad movement in Germany.

    Opinion polls show that growing numbers of Germans are worried about the consequences of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged mass immigration from Muslim countries.

    Germans are especially concerned about the refusal of millions of Muslim immigrants to integrate into German society, and about the emergence of a parallel legal system in Germany based on Islamic Sharia law.

    In an effort to reverse this tide of public opinion, the guardians of German multiculturalism have been working overtime to regain the initiative, mostly by trying to intimidate the critics of Islam into silence.

    The media campaign has been led by the Frankfurter Rundschau, a financially troubled daily newspaper based in Frankfurt am Main, the Berliner Zeitung, and the leftwing Spiegel, a newsmagazine based in Hamburg that has long served as the mouthpiece for German multiculturalism.

    A particular object of wrath is a highly popular German-language Internet website called Politically Incorrect (PI), which over the years has grown into a major information resource for people concerned about the spread of Islam in Germany.

    PI’s motto reads “Against the Mainstream, Pro-American, Pro-Israel, Against the Islamification of Europe” — which represents everything the German left abhors. Not surprisingly, many German media elites want PI shut down.

    Over the past several weeks, several German newspapers have used a stock of more than 10,000 stolen private emails to insinuate that the people behind PI are “undemocratic” and pose a threat to the German constitutional order. They are demanding that the PI website, as well as the counter-jihad movement (referred to as “Islamophobes”) more generally, be subject to surveillance by the domestic German intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV).

    Frankfurter Rundschau, for example, has fomented the hysteria by publishing dozens of agitprop articles, some by Mely Kiyak, a first-generation German whose parents were Turkish-Kurdish immigrants. Kiyak, who calls herself a “political pioneer,” portrays all critics of Islam as hate-mongers.

    One article is titled “Politically Incorrect: Vulgar, Uninhibited, Racist,” and says that “the Internet portal ‘Politically Incorrect’ is part of an international network of Islam haters and Muslim stalkers. This is confirmed by research conducted by the Frankfurter Rundschau.”

    In another article, titled “PI News: Prototype of the New Right,” Frankfurter Rundschau links criticism of Islam with anti-Semitism: “The ‘New Right’ has been growing for ten years and has momentum. The blog ‘Politically Incorrect’ shows what the movement looks like. The director of the Center for Research on Anti-Semitism, Wolfgang Benz, sees parallels to anti-Semitism.” Open expressions of anti-Semitism are illegal in post-war Germany; the inference here is that those who criticize Islam are guilty of committing a crime.

    Other Frankfurter Rundschau articles are titled: “Politically Incorrect: Where the Internet Stinks;” “Rightwing Populists: United in their Hatred of Muslims,” and “Politically Correct Hatred.”

    The Berliner Zeitung, in a frenzied article titled “Politically Incorrect: Inside the Network of Islam Haters,” asserts: “PI is far more than a harmless website. It is rather a highly conspiratorial organization that works to demonize an entire faith community. It plays a vital role in an international network of those who hate Islam. It provides racists and glorifiers of violence who share the world view of the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik with a forum.”

    Spiegel magazine, in an article titled “Germany’s Anti-Muslim Scene: Authorities Debate Surveillance of Islamophobes,” asserts that right-wing populism is a new form of extremism: “Islamophobes in Germany could come under increased surveillance by the country’s domestic intelligence agency. There are concerns that the anti-Muslim scene is becoming increasingly dangerous. In essence, the question is whether the hatred of Muslims is enough to endanger freedom of religion and international understanding, or whether it is a radical but legitimate expression of opinion by individual authors within the limits of the constitution.”

    For its part, Spiegel magazine has worked hard to portray all critics of Islam as belonging to the “far right” even though opinion polls overwhelmingly show that voters from across the political spectrum are concerned about the spread of Islam in Germany.

    An opinion survey called “Perception and Acceptance of Religious Diversity,” which was conducted by the sociology department of the University of Münster in partnership with the prestigious TNS Emnid political polling firm, shows that the majority of Germans disagree with a statement by German President Christian Wulff that Islam “belongs in Germany” because of the four million Muslims who now live there. Germany has Western Europe’s second-biggest Islamic population after France, with Turks the single biggest minority.

    The study shows that only 34% of the West Germans and 26% of the East Germans have a positive view of Muslims. Fewer than 5% of the Germans think Islam is a tolerant religion, and only 30% say they approve of the building of mosques. The number of Germans who approve of the building of minarets or the introduction of Muslim holidays is even lower.

    Fewer than 10% of the West Germans and 5% of the East Germans say that Islam is a peaceful religion. More than 40% of Germans believe that the practice of Islam should be vigorously restricted.

    Only 20% of the Germans believe that Islam is suitable for the Western world. Significantly, more than 80% of the Germans agree with the statement “that Muslims must adapt to our culture.” More than one million immigrants living permanently in Germany cannot speak German.

    Another survey, called “Global Views on Immigration” and conducted by the London-based Ipsos global research firm, found that more than half the Germans believe “there are too many immigrants” in their country.

    In response to the polling question “Would you say that immigration has generally had a positive or negative impact?” 54% of the Germans said the impact has been negative. Nearly 60% of the Germans agree with the survey statement: “Immigration has placed too much pressure on public services” in Germany.

    The report “Muslim-Western Tensions Persist,” published by the Washington, DC-based Pew Research Center, shows that 61% of the Germans believe their relations with Muslims are bad. The poll also shows that 72% of the Germans believe Muslims in their countries do not want to integrate; and 79% of the Germans believe Islam is “the most violent” religion. More than two-thirds of the Germans are worried about Islamic extremists in their country.

    A separate poll conducted by the Pew Global Attitudes Project shows that 71% of the Germans believe Islamic veils should be banned in public, including in schools, hospitals and government offices.

    Another survey, published by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, a think tank linked to the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), found that 55% of the Germans believe that Arabs are “unpleasant,” and over 33% believe the country is being “overrun” by immigrants. The study also noted that “far-right attitudes” are not isolated at the extremes of German society, but to a large degree are “at the center of it.”

    The surveys show clearly and consistently that most Germans are worried about the impact that Muslim immigration is having on their daily lives. In a country stifled by political correctness and a long-running war on free speech, Politically Incorrect is giving a voice to frustrated Germans who see the harm being wrought by the cult of multiculturalism. The tide of public opinion in Germany has shifted, and Germany’s establishment is unlikely to succeed in reversing it.

    Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for Transatlantic Relations at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook.

Comments are closed.