The Schoolbook Jihad: Soon Coming to Your Children's School, Roll Over, Infidel!

The Enablers Can’t Wait to Be Subjugated.

SIOA IN ACTION: Parents speak out Against CAIR School Lesson on Islam, Demand Equal Time  (Atlas Shrugs)

This is exactly one of the action items outlined in my new book, Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance.

People are waking up.

Parents, individuals, concerned freedom lovers are fighting back. Across the country we see Muslim Brotherhood proxies under the guise of multiculturalism, diversity and tolerance come into our public schools and proselytize for Islam, deceive our children and whitewash jihad. That is what was wrong with the Rick Perry/Aga Khan school curriculum on Islam.


If Muslim Brotherhood groups are coming into your school to speak or altering the curriculum to whitewash Islam, demand equal time on all fronts. If they are speaking about Islam, invite Ibn Warraq, Ayaan Hirsi Ali or Wafa Sultan to speak. If they are whitewashing Islam, ask Bat Ye’or or Hindu leaders or former Sudanese slave Simon Deng to speak. YOU MUST DO THIS.

An unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist funding trial in our nation’s history (HLF), Hamas-tied CAIR is demanding access to our children in the public schools to speak to children and teach them about Islam. That is like Goebbels coming into public schools to talk about National Socialism (Nazism).

If your school system is dumb enough to allow these subversives near our kids, demand equal time; these parents did. Brilliant.

The news organization reporting this story did not even do a cursory investigation of the Muslim Brotherhood group, CAIR. Shame on them.  (Pamela has a lot more)

 Is Germany ready to rewrite history to please Muslims?

The buzzword here is ‘cultural racism’. Teaching kids their own history and the facts about Islam is ‘colonialist chauvinism’ in the age of dhimmitude.

Islam prejudice rampant in Europe’s school books: study

BERLIN —(AFP)


European school books present a distorted image of Islam and Muslims, using stereotypes that breed mistrust of the faith and its people, a five-country study published Thursday showed.

This slanted view reflects “cultural racism,” concluded Germany’s Georg Eckert Institute for textbook research, which analysed 27 volumes used in classrooms in Britain, France, Austria, Spain and Germany.

The report, which was presented at the foreign ministry in Berlin, was billed as the first of its kind in Europe.

“Islam is always presented as an outdated system of rules which has not changed since its golden age,” Susan Krohnert-Othman, the institute’s project director, told reporters.

The researchers concluded that Islam is frequently presented as a homogenous entity without reflecting its diversity in different parts of the world. The report did not find major differences between the five countries studied.

The textbooks used at the secondary school level frequently set an “antiquated Islam” against a “modern Europe” and depict them as in conflict with each other.

Krohnert-Othman said that such representations “cannot challenge populist Islamophobia” among pupils.

“Even modern European school books include oversimplified presentations of Islam and they stand in the way of a credible intercultural dialogue with the Muslim world,” said Germany’s minister of state for European affairs at the foreign ministry, Cornelia Pieper, after reading the study’s findings.

The researchers called on schools to present information on reforms advocated by Muslim clerics and intellectuals as well as the modernisation process within the religion.

And they said instruction on cultural diversity needed a major overhaul.

“Muslims must no longer be classified as a separate group consisting of non-European immigrants whose traditions prevent integration,” the researchers concluded.

 

5 thoughts on “The Schoolbook Jihad: Soon Coming to Your Children's School, Roll Over, Infidel!”

  1. Quote:
    “Muslims must no longer be classified as a separate group consisting of non-European immigrants whose traditions prevent integration,” the researchers concluded.
    end

    And this is the multicultural view.
    I do not use it, and I discourage others from using it.
    I use the Orient/ Occident perspective. Muslims come from an Oriental tradition that stifles the individual in favor of the authority of the community, or in favor of the authority of the despot.
    Occidentalism is the corpus of Western Civilization– and the ideas that bind those texts together are radically different from anything in the Oriental tradition.
    What this person is saying is that the West has no Civilization, no Culture, and no history.
    She seems to believe that history began in the year 2000.

  2. There is no unity in diversity.
    The only protection diversity has is diversity itself.
    Deny the validity of the multicultural paradigm. To diversity, it is destruction.

  3. “What this person is saying is that the West has no Civilization, no Culture, and no history.
    She seems to believe that history began in the year 2000.”

    Not so sure about that. Its a misguided attempt to make Muslims feel good about themselves by denying ones own history, culture and civilization.
    That’s Dhimmitude.

    Not necessarily self-hatred, but fear of offending the criminally aggressive Muslims who assert themselves.

    The appeasers seem to think they can pacify the Muslims by rolling over by questioning their own values, cultural relativity is a disease.

    But many teachers have been attacked, fired and cautioned to avoid anything that could offend. The next step is either a history rewritten to suit the Muselmanic perspective, or the Mohammedan history in all its glory that cannot be questioned.

    Interesting times indeed.

  4. Look at the history of Christian countries occupied by islam. What is being taught in these countries about their real history?

    Look at France, where they managed to stop any discussion about national identity

    England, where it at some time recently, was almost forbidden to claim that drinking tea was typical British, or, that anything at all was typical British

    Sweden, where the PM stated that there are no real Swedes, because “everybody is a Swede”, and socialist leader Mona Sahlin before that, laughed at Swedish culture, and claimed there was no Swedish culture as such

    This historical cultural murder/suicide is happening in country after country. What is different from the seventh century, and on?

    Interesting times. Indeed.

Comments are closed.