Crazy uncle Ron Paul is a moron. He not only runs with enemy propaganda, he literally hijacks the Arab agenda.Â Ron Paul is a simpleton and a tool.
Here’s where it comes from, the roots of Ron Paul’s views are becoming clearer:
Imad-ad-Dean Ahmad is a Muslim
academic infil-traitor who served formerly as a Ron Paul adviser in 2008, and perhaps later:
Among other articles rationalizing Islam, Dr. Ahmad has written about the US actions which he claims caused al-Qaeda’s aggression towards the US.
Here he goes again. Ron Paul and Barack Obama agree that jihad terrorism is our fault, caused by our actions, and capable of being ended by something that we do. It never occurs to either of them how ethnocentric and condescending this is: they both assume that Muslims are just passive reactors to American enormities, not people who might be able to think for themselves and hate us for reasons of their own that are independent of what we do or don’t do — such as the doctrine of jihad.
“Ron Paul: ‘Flawed’ US policies led to 9/11,” by Justin Sink forÂ The Hill, November 20 (thanks to JW):
Ron Paul said that American policymakers were at least partially at fault for the country being attacked on 9/11 during a discussion of foreign policy on CBS’s Face the Nation Sunday.Paul argued that the American military presence in Saudi Arabia – rather than ideological differences or anger over American prosperity – were motivation for the September 11 hijackers.
“Just remember that immediately after 9/11, we removed the base in Saudi Arabia, our policies definitely had an influence,” Paul said. “To argue the case they want to do us harm because we’re free and prosperous I think is a very dangerous notion, because it’s not true.”
Host Bob Schieffer then pressed Paul on whether that wasn’t the equivalent of blaming America for the attacks.
“If you have a flawed policy, that may have influenced it… that’s a far cry from blaming America,” Paul responded.
“So what you’re saying is that it was the government’s fault,” Schieffer then said.
“I’m saying the policymaker’s fault,” Paul responded. “[They] contributed to it, contributed to it.”
Paul went on to say that if he became president, he would pull troops out of overseas bases, arguing that submarines and long-range missiles would work just as well as deterrents.
“Absolutely, and the people are with me on that, those troops oversees aggravate our enemies,” Paul said….
Yes, indeed, just as American troops aggravated the Nazis in Europe in 1944 and 1945.
“I think the greatest danger for us now is to overreact… Iran doesn’t have a bomb, there’s no proof, and for us to overreact and talk about bombing Iran is much more dangerous,” Paul said….
Ron Paul should read Sultan Knish:
There is no surer path to Muslim violence than through the legitimization of Muslim grievance. And once you accept the legitimacy of the grievance, then you are also bound to accept the legitimacy of the violence that follows. (Must read, continue…)
It is noteworthy that we have never, in ten years since 9/11, seen Muslims anywhere in the U.S. mount a demonstration of comparable size against Islamic jihad terrorism and the supposed “hijacking” of Islam by terrorists. Even worse, the protesters failed to explain how they would propose to stop Islamic jihad terrorism in the U.S. without this kind of vigilance.
Among the reasons are 6 reasons listed below. The quotation is taken from Dr. Ahmad’s article:
“Our leaders say he and his followers hate us because of who we are, because we have early primaries in Iowa every four years and allow women in the workplace. That’s nonsense. I don’t think he would have those things in his country. But that’s not why he opposes us. I read bin Laden’s writings and I take him at his word. He and his followers hate us because of specific aspects of U.S. foreign policy. Bin Laden lays them out for anyone to read. Six elements: our unqualified support for Israel; our presence on the Arabian peninsula, which is land they deem holy; our military presence in other Islamic countries; our support of foreign states that oppress Muslims, especially Russia, China and India; our long-term policy of keeping oil prices artificially low to the benefit of Western consumers but the detriment of the Arab people; and our support for Arab tyrannies who will do that.” (emphasis added)
The quotation is originally by Michael Scheuer, but Dr. Ahmad quotes it approvingly. Dr. Admad is affiliated with many organizations, among which are Islamic-American Zakat Foundation (” a 501 (c)(3) tax-exempt religious and charitable organization which primarily serves poor and needy Muslims in the United States”) , and Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslimâ€“Christian Understanding.
Please note that Zakat, the Muslim claim to charity, only satisfies a Muslim’s obligation if it is given to Muslims. In other words, official Muslim charities would have to help non-Muslims “off the books”, so to speak.
Anyway, this is where Ron Paul is getting his advice and views on Islam and the Middle East. Ron Paul apparently has not taken the initiative to explore other points of view, or to investigate the very real Muslim political and demographic threat to the US, Canada, and Europe.
“Muslims to NYPD: ‘Respect us, we will respect you,’” from theÂ Associated Press, November 18 (thanks to JW):