‘Despicable’ police officer who raped girl, seven, is jailed for 18 years of prison da’awa
(He’ll be out in nine…)
A policeman was starting an 18-year jail sentence today for sex abuse which a judge described as one of the ‘most despicable’ cases he had ever heard.
The 43-year-old officer was sacked from Thames Valley Police after being disciplined for repeatedly threatening witnesses who had lodged complaints against him.
He had also phoned a 14-year-old girl witness in a case he was dealing with and asking her to go on a date him.
Judge Francis Sheriden jailed paedophile policeman Mohammed Younas after hearing how he raped a girl who was just seven years old and continued to abuse her for eight years.
Related:
He had also turned up to work drunk after consuming a bottle of vodka and was found wandering the streets randomly stopping traffic whilst on duty.
Despite his dismissal from the force, the judge heard that the sexual abuse of the girl, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, increased,
Younas attacked the young girl, the court was told, because his wife refused to have sex with him. He also forced another child to touch his genitals.
‘This was the most despicable offence. It’s hard to imagine a worse case,’ Judge Sheridan told the disgraced constable as he stood in the dock at Aylesbury Crown Court.
Verdict: Judge Francis Sheriden, speaking at Aylesbury Crown Court, above, described the case as ‘despicable’Younas had denied the 15 counts of rape and sexual assault against him but was found guilty by a jury and on Friday was sentenced to 18 years in prison.
The court had heard Younas came to the UK from Pakistan and was descended from a respectable family with two of his sisters being consultant doctors and another being a headteacher.
His father was a retired colonel in the Pakistan Army.
However the judge was told that Younas, from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, suffered a nervous breakdown due to his unhappy marriage and went off the rails as a police officer.
It was during the breakdown that the abuse started and continued until the girl had reached the age of 15 years.
At the height of the abuse Younas would rape her every other day and the court heard he would make her touch him whilst they both played a board game.
Judge Sheridan said: ‘You and your wife were totally incompatible, there was a clash of cultures and views on family life.
‘You were dismissed from the police because you were totally unsuitable to be a police officer. You displayed signs of a man on the verge of a breakdown.
‘You walked around the street drunk, stopping traffic. You threatened witnesses who made complaints against you and you rang a 14-year-old girl to ask her to go out with you.
‘The offending started at around the same time. You showed contempt for your wife and you left your victims psychologically damaged. You robbed them of their childhood.
‘It’s the most dreadful, dreadful case I must sentence you for.’
As well as being jailed for 18 years, Younas was handed a Sexual Offences Prevention Order banning him from unsupervised contact or communication with a person under 16.
He was put on the Sex Offenders Register for an indefinite period and given a restraining order banning him from contacting the victims.
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
Who had the bright idea of letting a Muslim be a Police Officer in the first place? They have no loyalty to the concept of law and order, only loyalty to the Muslim Ummah, and therefore should never be allowed access to the echelons of the Police Force, the Military, or to Politics or the Judiciary. Never, ever, ever.
When are we all going to see the light? I am afraid that it is already too late as there is too much momentum with these knuckle dragers anyway.
THIS IS NOT A RELIGION!!!! IT IS AN IDEOLOGY!
Very thinly disguised as a religion.
We are at war with a political movement and only the ones on the bottom rungs of the ladder are in the blind.
Is a devout muslim policeman obliged to consider himself subject to sharia, much more than to the man made law that he has presumably sworn an oath to uphold.
For a muslim, observance of sharia makes the difference between eternal torment, or seventy two renewable virgins, some not unattractive pre-pubescent boys etc.
Another issue:
Muslims are expected to regard themselves as members of the ummah, first and foremost.
This takes precedence over all affiliations to any other cultures. The honour/shame of the ummah, versus dar al harb, the land of infidel darkness, is a central muslim doctrine, exemplified brilliantly in the notion of the dhimmi.
As it turns out, the ummah is a highly delicate entity, sensitive to the slightest of slights. An almost world wide, quiveringly devout community, it is being victimised by Jews, Yanks and all the usual suspects. Beware the old muslim saying:
“When a koran burns in Texas, nineteen randomly selected infidels are beheaded in Afghanistan.”
Such are the delicate sensitivities of the ummah. So – ‘WATCH IT, OR ELSE.’”
How, therefore, can infidels have confidence in the impartiality of a muslim police person, in a dispute involving infidels and muslims?
This is a question that moderate muslims, (I prefer my own term, ‘sleeper muslims’) ,should be at pains to address very publicly, so that infidels won’t feel themselves to be the victims of koran-mandated muslim prejudice. (Role reversal).
The potential causes for concern about muslim impartiality are just as well documented as those of seemingly innate Western racism.
Thanks to jihad, the total of those murdered, enslaved, robbed, raped and forced on penalty of death to convert, already runs into the millions. And look at the weapons infidel technology has provided them. There are no signs that this will stop. It must therefore be resisted.
Cheers