France Struggles to Limit and Cover Up Muslim New Year Violence

Thank you Cheradenine Zakalwe for putting this up.


A (Muslim) commenter on Cheradenine’s blog applies pretzel logic:

“Thats what you get when you oppress and do not allow Muslims to practice their religion…”

But by terrorizing unbelievers the soldiers of allah are practicing their so-called religion. Now if  non-Muslims oppose the jihad and persecute the terrorists, Muslims claim victimhood and claim we ‘do not allow them  to practice… whatever they practice.

We really have to ask ourselves  why do we  allow the Koranimals to settle among us in the first place…..?

Cars burnt in Strasbourg on New Year’s Night 2009

On New Year’s night last year 1100 cars were burnt in France in what has become a ritual of Muslim violence. Across 2010 as a whole, an astonishing 40,000 cars were burnt in the country.

On New Year’s night 2009/2010, 1137 cars were burnt and the year before that 1147. We won’t know how many were burnt last night, though, because the French government has decided not to publish the figures. They say this is to prevent the Muslims (they don’t actually say Muslims of course) trying to out-compete themselves.

Note the extraordinary measures the French state is now taking to try and limit the problem: banning retail sales of fuel and fireworks and the carrying of liquid in bottles (no doubt to prevent Muslim Molotov cocktails).

The 3 stages of jihad 

(David Wood explains the diabolical system that will lead to our destruction if we don’t defend ourselves)

via Vlad

Sales of petrol and other combustibles will be limited on New Year’s Eve in a bid to curb what has become an annual tradition of revellers torching hundreds of cars, police said.

Youths in the often depressed suburbs of French cities have been torching hundreds of vehicles on New Year’s Eve since the early 1990s in what police say has become a competition to see which area can cause the most damage.

Police last year said they would no longer release figures for the number of vehicles set on fire to put an end to the “competition and ranking” that had emerged, with more than 1,000 vehicles being torched every year.

In a police circular seen by AFP, Interior Minister Claude Gueant urged security forces to “mobilise with the greatest vigilance” for the New Year’s Eve celebrations on Saturday.

Instructions sent with the circular said local security forces should take all measures necessary including “restricting retail sales of petrol.”

In Paris, where tens of thousands are expected to gather for the annual celebration on the Champs Elysées, police have banned the sale of “domestic combustibles” such as lighter fuel from Wednesday to Monday.

Alcohol sales have also been banned around the Champs Elysées on New Year’s Eve.

Paris police noted in a statement on Thursday that as in other recent years fireworks will be banned on the Champs Elysées and no official display will take place.

“There will not be a fireworks display in the capital on the night of December 31st,” the statement said.

“The sale and use of all fireworks are strictly forbidden during the year-end holiday season because they are liable to seriously disrupt public order and security.”

It noted that the sale of fireworks during that period was punishable by a fine of up to 1,500 euros ($1,940) and their use by a fine of 38 euros.

Tens of thousands of police are expected to take to the streets of France to ensure security on Saturday.

During last year’s celebrations, nearly 54,000 security officers, including police and gendarmes, were deployed, including more than 8,000 in Paris.

6 thoughts on “France Struggles to Limit and Cover Up Muslim New Year Violence”

  1. Blame the rightwings for discrimmination
    Winston Churcil was 100% right he said
    Feed the alligator , and one day it will eats you ..
    thats exactly the Islam

  2. Right on, sheik…Winston experienced Islam first-hand.
    He wrote about the cult in “The River Wars”.
    Islam doesn’t change. It hasn’t change in 1400 years. So, when we read something, observations, that were written about Islam 100 years ago, or 1200 years ago, we can still apply those same observations to Islam today.

  3. Strangely I have no bad feelings about the Mohammedan mobs carbequeing in Paris. Such is my contempt for the French I in fact rather enjoy seeing them get what they deserve.

    “sheik bin kafir” What Churchill actually said is ‘ “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.” Which has a completely different meaning to what you have written.
    He also wrote :-
    “Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has no heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.”

    “How dreadful are the curses which Islam lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

    A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property‹either as a child, a wife, or a concubine must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

    No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

    Far from being moribund, Islam is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science -the science against which it had vainly struggled -the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

    ~~ Sir Winston Churchill~~

    All of which is as true today as when he wrote it.

  4. As Pragmatist notes, Churchill understood the enemy that is islam very well, just as he understood the NSDAP and the henchmen of Herr Hitler. Neville Chamberlain did not, and by his weak responses to the action of Hilter, the Nazis were able to declare war on Europe confident on the inability of Great Britian and the USA to react. It may even have been possible to have averted WW2 (here I treat the Japanese invasion of Manchuria as being a separate event) if the European political leadership had shown some spine in the early thirties – and this would have also included halting the grossly unfair reparation payments from Germany as well (a step that would have required a great deal of personnel political courage!). We are faced with a similar situation today, where the NSDAP has been replaced by the islamists who are much more dangerous, and our politicans are following the Neville Chamberlain route to war called appeasement. We voted these cretins into power, and we can remove them from power, so I would suggest that people do a lot of study and thinking about the history of the major conflicts that have arised in the last 100 years and how these conflicts were grown before they vote again – there are significant similarities with the situation we see today. And for those of you who voted the monkey into the white house (apologies to Monkeys – that was an unfair comparison), the monkey is responsible for setting much of the current instability we see being generated today – you voted for CHANGE – you got it – and this change will, most likely, end in war. Well done .. NOT! You live in a democracy and within that gift the responsibility of keeping one’s self informed and aware is paramount. Unless you want the immans rapeyoudaughter and rapeyourson deciding your future for you, you had best make a start of winning your country back. And you do that by making sure that democracy is working properly in your corner of the world.

Comments are closed.