NZ: 17-year-old Paki girl held hostage, forced into marriage by her parents and threatened with death…

Totally un-Islamic, of course. Don’t get any ideas, you racist bigot Islamophobes:

Sheikh Mohamed Amir, chairman of the religious advisory board at the Federation of Islamic Associations, said that although arranged marriages were common among Muslims, it was important to remember that forced marriage was not condoned in Islam and could happen in Hindu families or other cultures too.

For months, in an ordinary house in a Wellington suburb, a 17-year-old Pakistani was held hostage, trapped in a marriage forced on her by her parents and threatened with death.

Thanks to the Religion of Peace

The woman, who does not want to be identified, was married in 2010 without her consent or knowledge after her Muslim parents learned she had a Hindu boyfriend and became concerned she was too westernised. The man they chose for her was a distant relative, a 21-year-old she had met in passing.

While an arranged marriage has the consent of both parties and is the chosen practice for many around the world, a forced marriage is not advocated by any major religion.

The Wellington teenager refused to go ahead with the marriage, despite months of family threats of deportation and violence.

Then her parents took her to the Internal Affairs Department to sign what they said were visa documents but which she later found were marriage papers.

That night a ceremony was held at her parents’ home. She was told it was an engagement ceremony and, if she did not attend, she would be deported. After the ceremony she said her father told her she was married and was to go to her husband’s house in Newtown with him that night.

“I was crying all day and night. I didn’t want to get married. I don’t think any 17-year-old girl would want to get married.

“I was freaking out. I was still in shock and told the guy not to touch me. He was trying to be forceful to me sexually but, when I warned him about the police, he backed off.”

For two months she was held in a kind of prison with her husband and his family. They would not let her leave the house or use the phone and always supervised her. They demanded she sleep with her new husband and have a baby.

Her own parents visited once a week but barely spoke to her.

She finally did escape, and went to the police and ethnic women’s support organisation Shakti. Her marriage has since been annulled and her parents have gone back to Pakistan.

Before leaving, her father told her he would kill her if he saw her again. “I wanted to die. My dad was saying that to his own daughter, I couldn’t believe it.”

In the past two years Shakti has dealt with more than 25 cases of forced marriage in Auckland and Wellington.

Spokeswoman Priyanca Radhakrishnan said that, for each woman or girl who sought support for forced marriage-related issues, there was anecdotal evidence of many more in a similar situation.

Sheikh Mohamed Amir, chairman of the religious advisory board at the Federation of Islamic Associations, said that although arranged marriages were common among Muslims, it was important to remember that forced marriage was not condoned in Islam and could happen in Hindu families or other cultures too.

“It’s not a tradition, it is an incident that happens from time to time. It depends on the individual family.”

Ms Radhakrishnan said that, as awareness grew that forced marriage was illegal and that support structures were in place, the number of reported forced marriages would increase.

“It is not to say that the entire community acts this way, there will always be exceptions to the rule, but on the whole, women are given their place in society and in the family and as long as they adhere to that, they’re fine.

“The minute they don’t they face great odds to succeed or are deemed to have brought dishonour and shame to their families/communities and are ostracised or, in the worst case scenario, killed.”

20 thoughts on “NZ: 17-year-old Paki girl held hostage, forced into marriage by her parents and threatened with death…”

  1. The NZ taxpayers are paying this org for predictable problems we did not need to import..typical mullah , trying to put a not islam spin on it..No donations from me for this one..Some sort of charge should be laid against the parents and forwarded to Interpol. This may at least hinder there travel arrangements..My bet is that they are in Aussie..What mongrels..Unlikely that they were refugees if they have the cash to so easily move on.

  2. “Thanks to the Religion of Peace” did you read retraction published todayin the dompost? I hope that this will make you think twice about what you wrote and it will be nice to see a comment from you, Mr fast newspaper believer …

  3. You stupid muslim cow Ayatuaulah, the muslim woman made the claim which was then published by the press. This means she was either forcerd to retract it, or she was trying to string the press along. “Thanks to the RoP” is quite correct and this retraction simply shows that muslims are violent parasites who threaten and coerce others. You are not wanted ayatualah, and you are not needed, You are a dishonest, violent, and stupid muslim criminal. BTW muslims do regularly beat women into “submission” (following the example of their rapist child molesting profit) so one can hardly blame the press. Quite amazing that you have learned to cut and scan, although you have not operated the scanner correctly – just another little invention from the west which left you scum muslims behind centuries ago. Now go and scream in the mosque with your fellow rats, you stinking parastic germ! Do you seriously think because the woman retracted the statements she made under her own violition to the press that all is ok!!! Her retarded male relatives enter played their hand or
    the incident did not happen and the muslim woman was a scumbag (a typical muslim) who lied deliberately to the press.!!!!

    Folks – I suspect that it is likely that the muzzies set this up as a means to start initiating legal action against the press in NZ, in order to silence further criticsm again the religion of murderers called pislam. Remember, these are the same parasites who feel entitled to ask for removal of public holidays such as Christmas.

    About time to reduce the population of muslim scum. Why dont you help us muslims and start sending yourselves to your moon god.

  4. You stupid muslim cow Ayatuaulah, the muslim woman made the claim which was then published by the press. This means she was either forcerd to retract it, or she was trying to string the press along. “Thanks to the RoP” is quite correct and this retraction simply shows that muslims are violent parasites who threaten and coerce others. You are not wanted ayatualah, and you are not needed, You are a dishonest, violent, and stupid muslim criminal. BTW muslims do regularly beat women into “submission” (following the example of their rapist child molesting profit) so one can hardly blame the press. Quite amazing that you have learned to cut and scan, although you have not operated the scanner correctly – just another little invention from the west which left you scum muslims behind centuries ago. Now go and scream in the mosque with your fellow rats, you stinking parastic germ! Do you seriously think because the woman retracted the statements she made under her own violition to the press that all is ok!!! Her retarded male relatives enter played their hand or
    the incident did not happen and the muslim woman was a scumbag (a typical muslim) who lied deliberately to the press.!!!!

    Folks – I suspect that it is likely that the muzzies set this up as a means to start initiating legal action against the press in NZ, in order to silence further criticsm again the religion of murderers called pislam. Remember, these are the same parasites who feel entitled to ask for removal of public holidays such as Christmas.

  5. @ Kaw:
    I will not use the same language which you used, but I would like to highlight 4 points for you:
    1. to call someone a cow you need to be human, not only that but you need also to be a civilized human, and your response and the language you used does not show that you are a civilized human.

    2. I am communicating with you in your own language so that shows who is trying to understand the other, and I am sure you speak no other languages.

    3. Muslims have nothing to do with the moon, a simple search on the internet will teach you a bit about them, and that will help you find a better way for attacking them, and in case you do not want to search it online ask sheikyermami because it seems he knows a bit about them.
    4. it seems you did not understand the retraction, it said that the newspaper retracts, and not that the woman retracts, so you can’t say another man threatened the woman.
    and BTW I like your theory about the defamation case against the Dompost and I might proceed with that.

    @ sheikyermami:
    this happened in a western country, so that ( the husbands word is worth that of 2 women ) rule does not apply, and in case you mentioned that as an attack method, then this is the answer:

    that rule was set before 1400 years, and at that time woman from other civilizations did not have the right so say anything and there voices sis not count a voice nor half a voice, but Islam came and gave them rights to learn, inherit, say yes or no for a man who wants to marry her and a lot more than that.

    good day boys.

  6. @ Kaw:
    I will not use the same language which you used, but I would like to highlight 4 points for you:
    1. to call someone a cow you need to be human, not only that but you need also to be a civilized human, and your response and the language you used does not show that you are a civilized human.

    2. I am communicating with you in your own language so that shows who is trying to understand the other, and I am sure you speak no other languages.

    3. Muslims have nothing to do with the moon, a simple search on the internet will teach you a bit about them, and that will help you find a better way for attacking them, and in case you do not want to search it online ask sheikyermami because it seems he knows a bit about them.
    4. it seems you did not understand the retraction, it said that the newspaper retracts, and not that the woman retracts, so you can’t say another man threatened the woman.
    and BTW I like your theory about the defamation case against the Dompost and I might proceed with that.

    @ sheikyermami:
    this happened in a western country, so that ( the husbands word is worth that of 2 women ) rule does not apply, and in case you mentioned that as an attack method, then this is the answer:

    that rule was set before 1400 years, and at that time woman from other civilizations did not have the right so say anything and there voices did not count as a voice nor half a voice, but Islam came and gave them rights to learn, inherit, say yes or no for a man who wants to marry her and a lot more than that.

    good day boys.

  7. Hi..I am a female and attended this wedding. I know this girl and her family..This was not a forced or even arranged marriage.
    This Shakti group must be taught a lesson for publishing a false story

  8. @Kaw
    I don’t think ur parents sent u to school…U don’t come across as an educated and civilised man..ur language is pathetic…U come across a very racist man who is quite anti muslims….
    I think U shud study Islam and do some independent research rather than blindly believing the Christian/Jew news channels and Newspapers

  9. Ayatuaulah
    Lets rip your rubbish to pieces, shall we: you ignorant stupid muslim dog (an apology to dogs for equating dogs with the slime of the century (pathetic muslims)),
    >>to call someone a cow you need to be human, not only that but you >>need also to be a civilized human, and your response and the >>language you used does not show that you are a civilized human.
    Your first sentence makes absolutely no sense – to equate a muslims intelligence to that of a bovine form (assumed retarded and not representative of the species – ie most cows are brighter than muslims ) is an act that any intelligent observer would do. It is not necessary that the observer is human. Your lack of intelligence shows that you do not even deserve to be heard!!

    >2. I am communicating with you in your own language so that shows >who is trying to understand the other, and I am sure you speak no >other languages.
    Actaully I speak three others, but since the medium here is ENGLISH
    we try and write in English. I f you are trying to convince us that you are intelligent you have again failed miserably.

    >3. Muslims have nothing to do with the moon, a simple search on the >internet will teach you a bit about them, and that will help you find a >better way for attacking them, and in case you do not want to search >it online ask sheikyermami because it seems he knows a bit about >them.
    It is rather amusing that you have attempted to add humour to what attempts to pass as argument (albeit that your statement is incorrect because muslims stole an moniker for an old moon god), but you have failed miserably (yet again)! A simple search on the internet shows me that muslims are violent, parasitic scum who continually absolve themselves of all responsibility for the violence that they create and who whinge and whine like two year old children until they get their way (as you are do now). A simple search shows that muslims are responsible for the vast majority of sexually related attacks against women in Scandinavia, and that as population group you are significantly over-represented in the violent crime statistics in ALL
    non-muslim countries. A simple search showns that muslims have contributed absolutely nothing to humanity but that they keep convincing themselvews that they are somehow useful. No, you are not useful. There is a lot more – people should go through the historical record and they will then discover what worthless shit rats (apologies rats for equating you with a lower life form) like you actually are.

    >4. it seems you did not understand the retraction, it said that the >newspaper retracts, and not that the woman retracts, so you can’t say >another man threatened the woman.
    >and BTW I like your theory about the defamation case against the >Dompost and I might proceed with that

    No you haven’t understood what has happened – why the complaint might have been made and then retracted. I will not bother explaining the point again (you are too stupid) and most readers are are far more intelligent than you and have worked out the scenarios for themselves: your marginally amusing comments here simply show you for the stupid fool that you are. Now piss of you miserable mosque rat. As I said it seems that you muslim scum are lying to try and exert some influence on what the press can say about you scum. Considering that nothing of what you have done over the last millenium has been useful or good your attitude is of little surprise. and you can leave with it.

    Be alert folks – the utterance of this person clearly show intent and I suspect the intent is to try and use your laws to clamp down on your press.

  10. Karima,
    On the contrary your language is pathetic and it is clear that your attendence an any educational institution has been minimal, if at all. We do study your religion, and your religion is an abhorrence. Nothing more needs to be said. You are a typical muslim who understands very little, and seeks to destroy all that it cannot understand or that cannot be placing within the narrow confines of its limited world view. You are not fit to be called a hguman being.

    As I said, be very aware folks that these muslim parasites are trying to set up your media for a fall from which they can gain.

  11. Karima,
    It is quite clear that your parents did not send you to school, and your language is, at best, rather poor. We do study islam, and we find it abhorrent. Unlike you, who blindly believes the quran and the associated mullahs who spec their interpretations of the vile book, we are quite careful in confirming and validating what we read. The conclusion is that islam is for violent fools or stupid sheep. I think you should learn to think instead of fiosting your islamic drivel onto the rest of us.

    Folks in NZ – it is pretty clear that these muz are going to attack your press. be aware.

  12. Ayatuaulah.

    I would like to highlight the drivel in your four points

    1. An intelligent observed would equate muslim behavior with that of a lobotomised cow (extremely stupid). It is not necessary that the observer is human. Muslims also have a very thin veneer of civilisation within the modern interpretation of such.
    2. The language used on this site is English. Your point is???
    BTW I speak three other languages.
    3. Simple internet searches show a) muslims are overrepresented in violent crime in western nations, b) almost all religious violence is driven by muslims, c) muslims, as a nation, have done nothing to enrich our species, d) muslims are not capable of critical evaluation and interpretation of data – they behave rather like murderous sheep.
    Even you own quran is a book of violence. The facts dispute your claim to be peaceful, and none of you can ably refute this.
    4. On the contrary, you have either unintentionally or deliberately misunderstood the role being played by the muslima who made the complaint in the first case. The retract ocured because she retracted her statement. Why? You clearly are not intelligent, but most others do understand the implication of what has happened.

    Why are you parasites polluting Wellington!!!!!!!

  13. “An intelligent observed would equate muslim behavior with that of a lobotomised cow (extremely stupid). It is not necessary that the observer is human” I do not even have to waste my time and read the rest of you genius speech…

    It is clear that this is confession, maybe a hidden one, that you are not human, a cow at your best, and I think that is why you mentioned them a lot and talked about them so passionately.

    Go chew some green and don’t forget to congratulate yourself because you knew how to chew it.

Comments are closed.