What’s the difference between al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?

by sheikyermami on April 29, 2012

The Muslim Brotherhood is “largely secular”, and only wants to kill all Jews…

Remember: Qaradawi is often portrayed as “moderate” by Western media.

Qaradawi calls for holy war to destroy Israel— how did he get such a crazy idea? Muslim spokesmen in the west keep telling us that there is no such thing as “holy war”, that it was only a bunch of nutty Christians that have such a concept……

Now, we all know that ‘al Qaeda’ is the enemy and…. (don’t mention the Jews) we killed most of their leaders, so there is nothing to worry about, except: we have no silver bullet to destroy Al-Qaeda according to US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta

John Brennan, chief counter-terrorism adviser to President Obama, said Sunday while al-Qaida has been significantly weakened, a high state of vigilance is still needed in the air-travel industry.

“Aviation has been a traditional target of al-Qaida and they continue to do that,” Brennan said on ABC’s “This Week.”

Brennan agreed the slaying of Osama bin Laden a year ago was a major development in what he said was the overall degradation of al-Qaida capabilities.

CAIR Praises Department Of Defense For Dropping Training Course
Willie Clitman tells us we are safe under Obama: The Audacity of Bubba

This administration is a ship of fools.

Join the discussion...

Too small? Click here This is a satirical website. None of what you read here has anything to do with Islam, because Islam is a Religion of Peace. Everybody knows that good Muslims never do the things they do, (because Allah does it for them, Quran 8:12) and we know that only our misperceptions, ignorance and stereotyping of Islam makes Muslims chop off heads, kill and rape women and children, bomb subways, buses, nightclubs and fly jets into buildings. If it wasn't for the media and da Jooozzz, we wouldn't even know its happening. We welcome open, honest, thoughtful, and vigorous discussion in the comments threads, so do yourself a favour and don't accuse us of being 'haters' because we are loving, tolerant people. Don't curse us, don't threaten us with death or hellfire, and don't accuse us of being "just like the terrorists" because we don't do to Muslims what they do to us or to themselves. Yes, we know that only idiots oppose Islam and sensible people submit, but you should know that we are ignorant bigots, hypocrites and Islamophobes, and we prefer to remain that way... But since you are forcing yourselves (and your abhorrent belief-system on us) we will defend ourselves, because we must. Avoid tu quoque and ad hominem attacks. Don't bother with circular reasoning either, we been there, done it. If you annoy us, you will be banned and your posts summarily deleted. Try to add to the discussion, don't try to sell snake oil, don't try to cover us with Islamic shrouds of kitman and taqiyya, don't bother with da'awa, (we've heard it before) don't spam us with long pieces of cut & paste, write in English, try to tell the truth, (we know that's hard for you because you are all pathological liars) but the truth will set you free, try it! One more thing: don't think you can post here under multiple monikers. You will quickly be disappeared! The same goes for trufers and conspiracy kooks: you get one chance, one time. Blow it out of your ass if you must; put your stupidity on display. But you won't be back, trust me on that. Take a deep breath before you post, try to make some sense, do not just vent, do not make a fool of yourself and if you prove us wrong you can earn 10 Islamic dollars for your piggy bank. Deal?

{ 4 comments }

PJG April 30, 2012 at 1:52 am: But what if bin Laden was killed as although he was no longer a driving force, his death would mean a boost for a US president whose aims coincided with bin Laden’s own (Islamic conquest) but who felt comfortable about sacrificing his brother in order to achieve their common goal through his re-election, an end towards which such a bold and decisive act would surely contribute?
Machiavellian? Possible?
Pragmatist April 30, 2012 at 2:28 am: Politically Correct Left Wing moonbats insist that every terrorist act is down to “al Qaeda’. Why well because they cannot deny that terrorism is taking place, so blaming everything on ‘al quaeda’ means they don’t have to face REALITY and admit that the REAL cause is ISLAM.
sheikyermami April 30, 2012 at 5:16 am: Bin Laden blew the cover of many quiet operators who were hardly noticed before. Infiltration, mass-migration, da’awa, mosque building and lobbying politicians by utterly corrupting them was well on track before 9/11, but Binnie blew it.

Suddenly, the jihad got a lot more attention.

While the stealth jihadists work within the system to subvert it in order “to destroy our miserable house from within and replace all religion with the law of allah” the jihadists aim to subjugate us through terror.

Both strategies work in tandem; both strategies compliment each other, the outcome is the same.

In any case, did Obama sacrifice his muslim brother in order to achieve their common goal through his re-election?

Good question. I wouldn’t put it past him. In fact, it would make a lot of sense and it is in accordance to 9:111 ‘to kill and be killed in the way of allah’….

Obama is doing his best to keep the show on the road.
kaw April 30, 2012 at 7:58 am: Agree with Sheik’s analysis.