European court tipped off jihadist Abu Qatada …..

Corrupt European yuman rites judges have been accused of ‘alerting’ radical Muslim cleric Abu Qatada to the fact he still had time to lodge a last-ditch appeal against deportation.

European court tipped off jihadist Abu Qatada to help him make last-ditch appeal to stay in Britain

Because what does Britain need for what ails it? Obviously it needs more jihad terrorists. “European court ‘tipped off Abu Qatada over deadline to help him make last-ditch appeal to stay,'” by Brendan Carlin in the Daily Mail, April 21

Outrage in Britain

Cameron Pushes to Weaken Human Rights Court

The British government has been pounding “meddling” from Europe in the wake of a scandal over the extradition of abu Qatada, an Islamist radical that was delayed by a Strasbourg ruling. Now London is demanding radical reform of the European Court of Human Rights, a move opposed by Berlin. By Carsten Volkery more…

Mrs May  and her Government insist on revering and obeying the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg.

Peter Hitchens exposes this noisy, empty fraud on the public:

This court would have no actual power, if our ruling class had not willingly given it that power. If Britain withdrew from the entire Council of Europe tonight, nobody could or would do anything about it.

But we don’t withdraw, because our governing class long ago discovered that, in the name of ‘Human Rights’, it could override our old laws without any need for a vote or a debate.

The real Islamist threat to Britain and the rest of Europe comes from uncontrolled mass migration from Muslim countries. Combined with our national refusal to defend our British, Christian culture, this is rapidly creating a powerful and influential Muslim vote which will increasingly change our country.

Read more>>

European human rights judges have been accused of ‘alerting’ radical Muslim cleric Abu Qatada to the fact he still had time to lodge a last-ditch appeal against deportation.

Furious Home Office sources last night claimed that it was the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) itself that privately told Jordanian-born Qatada that there was still the possibility of an appeal

But they say there was no similar attempt by the Strasbourg-based court to warn Home Secretary Theresa May of the impending deadline.

Senior sources in Mrs May’s department told The Mail on Sunday that the ECHR had reminded Qatada last Monday that he still had the option to appeal.

One said: ‘They took it upon themselves to go to Qatada’s legal team and say, “You haven’t appealed yet. Are you likely to appeal?” ’…

But Tory MPs denounced the court for ‘an outrageous and partisan’ interference with the UK’s internal affairs and called on the Government to demand a ‘detailed explanation’ of the court’s actions…

4 thoughts on “European court tipped off jihadist Abu Qatada …..”

  1. Bundling bearded windbags on to jets won’t solve anything

    Peter Hitchens

    Theresa May, one of nature’s soppy liberals, is struggling to seem decisive over the deportation of the Bethlehem-born windbag Abu Qatada. The trouble is, Mrs May isn’t even any good at pretending to be tough.
    Labour and Tory politicians love this sort of charade. It makes them look as if they are guarding the nation against the Islamist threat. Like so much of what they do, it is a noisy, empty fraud on the public.
    They exaggerate hugely. Like several other furry-faced old blowhards, Qatada is said to have been Osama Bin Laden’s closest henchman. Perhaps he was. Perhaps he wasn’t. He isn’t now.
    He cannot really be much use as a Terrorist Godfather now that he has been on TV, and MI5 and the police watch his every movement. Well, can he? Think about it.
    It has all gone wrong for Mrs May because she and her department are not very good at what they do. But really the British people ought to have seen through this fake controversy by now.
    The real Islamist threat to Britain and the rest of Europe comes from uncontrolled mass migration from Muslim countries. Combined with our national refusal to defend our British, Christian culture, this is rapidly creating a powerful and influential Muslim vote which will increasingly change our country.
    Given a few more decades, it will have profoundly altered this country. I have long suspected that this island will be more or less Muslim within a century, and it will be the fault of this generation. It would be perfectly legitimate for a respectable, law-abiding and civilised political party to act now to prevent this.
    But instead they leave the subject to steroid-swallowing nutcases like Anders Breivik, or creepy opportunists like the BNP.

    Abu Qatada is driven away after being refused bail at a hearing in London
    Millions reasonably worry about this. But they are dismissed as extremists by a liberal establishment which views robust defence of Britain’s culture as bigotry.
    In Labour’s case this comes from a genuine loathing of Britain as it was. For the Tories, as in so many other matters, it is cowardice, combined with total lack of principle.
    They recoil like salted snails from the simple idea that immigrants should be expected to accept the customs, morals, language and traditions of their host country. They cannot explain why this idea is wrong, because it is not wrong.

    The migrants have come here voluntarily. While they are welcome to follow their faith and maintain their culture, by seeking and continuing to live here, they and their descendants have accepted that our culture should remain dominant, our religion remain established and our language and laws remain supreme.
    It is the opposite of ‘intolerant’ for any British person to say that he does not want to see Sharia law or polygamy in operation here. Nor should we be embarrassed to condemn forced marriages or the horribly misnamed murders known as ‘honour killings’.
    As for ‘racism’, the statements of some Muslim leaders about Jews are among the nastiest examples of prejudice in the modern world. It is interesting, in a bitter way, to see how reluctant the politically correct Left are to attack this, or even admit the problem exists.
    As a Christian who is grieved by many features of modern Britain I often find myself allied with British Muslims. I have yet to meet a Muslim I don’t like.
    But that doesn’t stop me saying that I do not want this to be a Muslim society, which is the likely long-term result of the liberal elite’s twin policies – of open borders and multiculturalism.
    Bundling bearded mullahs on to aeroplanes doesn’t actually make any difference to this. It is a crude attempt to seem tough while actually being weak.
    Anyway, Mrs May cannot even bundle mullahs efficiently – because she and her Government insist on revering and obeying the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg.
    This court would have no actual power, if our ruling class had not willingly given it that power. If Britain withdrew from the entire Council of Europe tonight, nobody could or would do anything about it.
    But we don’t withdraw, because our governing class long ago discovered that, in the name of ‘Human Rights’, it could override our old laws without any need for a vote or a debate.
    Our allegiance to the court exists only because of a well-intentioned blunder by our grandfathers. When they adopted the European Human Rights Convention more than 60 years ago, they never thought it would apply to us.
    In those days we were rightly confident that our liberties were guaranteed by safeguards forged over seven centuries, from Magna Carta of 1215 to the Bill of Rights of 1689.
    On the far side of the Channel things were profoundly different. Despotism, fanaticism, organised hatred and aggression were never far away.
    Take Strasbourg itself, where the Human Rights Court sits. In 1950, that lovely, haunted place had only recently got rid of its own Gestapo office, complete with torture chambers. National Socialist pseudo-scientists at the perverted Reich university there had been working on setting up a mad, grotesque museum of Jewish skeletons.
    These medieval horrors were taking place in a modern city as late as 1944. Had events turned out slightly differently, they would still be going on now.
    No wonder it seemed a good idea to set up some sort of mechanism to stand in the way of such things.
    But we never needed it on our side of the Channel, and we do not need it here now. We only continue to obey it because our establishment finds it useful in its unrelenting campaign to stamp out common sense, and abolish Britain as we have known it.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2133247/PETER-HITCHENS-Bundling-bearded-windbags-jets-wont-solve-anything.html#ixzz1sljHlTTh

  2. One deterrent to halt the influx of Mohammedans into Britain – seal up or destroy the Channel tunnel.

  3. Even Peter Hitchens hasn’t got it yet. The simple fact is that Demography is Destiny. The very fact that the UK and Europe have such a large and growing (rapidly) non-indigenous population makes it inevitable that the whole of Europe will become Islamic. The various Euro-Med agrrements made without the indigenous population of Europe having any democratic say is the biggest act of treason in history. It will be interesting to see whether Europe goes under with a whimper or a bang?

  4. Wow! We best take heed to this, we are not far behind our European cousins? They are being allowed to undermine us at every turn and with the help from the likes of Chris Christie, Graham, Murkowski and even McCain and others from our party…I have seen these Liberals go tree swinging ape crazy over my post against these Muslims, and I will admit to this one thing, I despise them to the point of sheer lunacy. And as a Southerner, I’ve accepted the fact that nothing can cleanse me of it. Racist? Perhaps I am. Do I care? Notta bit of shame do I…I deplore them within every cell of my handsomeness LOL. Well I was a cute baby?

Comments are closed.