Racism: Lets Take a Real Close Look!

There’s a few articles here on this post.

The first one is by Vickie Janson:  Redefining Racism –

Last week in Melbourne I attended the Human Rights Commission’s Anti-racism strategy meeting. I think we’d all agree that no decent person supports racism and how even utilizing the term triggers strong reactions of disgust and loathing with images of ‘white only’ public facilities. Despite not seeing any evidence for such images in modern Australia, we were quickly advised how prevalent this ugly disease is amongst average Australians. It became apparent quite quickly as to why this was.  (continued below!)

We are told to regard Nelson Mandela as a hero:

Eye Witness Reports on America’s Australia’s Death

When South Africa was a Western nation, it was regarded as behind the times. Now that it has become a Third World socialist hellhole, it has leaped ahead to show us our future. A South African journalist reports under a pseudonym:  Moonbattery has the story….

For the sake of a coward’s concept of peace, white South Africans allowed their country to degenerate into savagery.

While the stated aim of the strategy meeting was to reduce endemic racism, it was paradoxically to be achieved by broadening the definition of racism itself. I was a bit confused as to how broadening the definition would reduce the problem when commonsense dictates that delegitimizing more speech and behavior, as ‘racist’ should only increase the incidence.

Most of us would probably define racism in a simple sentence as the unfair treatment of an individual based upon their race or ethnicity. Yet we were advised the definition of racism had been increased to five paragraphs and broadened to include discrimination against religion and/or gender and groups that are visibly different. As we broke into groups to discuss these things, our table became quite heated. At the suggestion that perhaps Anglo Australians also suffered a bit of racism and the same rules should apply to all, I was advised by an attendee in our group that ‘white is not a race, but a construct’. I later discovered both white and black are constructs so I assume racism only pertains to those ethnically in the middle!

How whites took over America

 A little role reversal goes a long way…..

The exercise was quite a mind bender. It was considered racist and intolerant to oppose ‘Muslim only swimming’ but neither racist nor intolerant for Muslim women to exclude non-Muslim women from these sessions. I was later reflecting how I’d had extremely bad service in a retail outlet recently and was tempted to complain, however I didn’t because the staff member was Indian and I felt sure I would have been accused of racism. However, if the person had been ‘white’ – I may have complained. The objection was to the customer service, not to the person’s race.

This double standard dilemma is a great concern. While no-one should be judged as inferior because of their race or ethnicity, enforcing ‘respect’ for other’s views and behavior is a denial of the egalitarian right to reject views and behavior.  It is an assault upon logic to assume all ideas and traditions are equally beneficially. Some might call this intellectual terrorism. If the world’s belief systems are all so equal then why do some work better than others to secure freedom, democracy and human rights? Who will decide if a criticism is racially motivated or a reasonable and legitimate concern? Who will decide if the way something is said is hateful, or if a recipient’s hatred of criticism has been projected onto the accused? It’s quite well known that people who commit adultery often project this onto their spouse accusing them of the infidelity.  Are these dilemma’s that are locked within the hearts of individuals really able to be legislated and enforced?

The ABC’s Four Corners documentary Without Consent highlights the difficulties with fostering a culture of ‘tolerance and silence’ many are advocating for here. Totalitarian regimes enforce ‘respect’ and punish ‘disrespect’ – is this any future for a healthy democracy?  Is it really racist to criticize intolerant and discriminatory aspects of other’s culture or religion? Or is it our responsibility to do so to safeguard the freedoms and the open, transparent culture Australia has been characterized by.  You can view this documentary here and decide for yourself if criticism more broadly should be redefined as ‘racist’:


With calls for a Media Regulator, Victoria’s Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, the Andrew Bolt and Alan Jones cases and this move to broaden racism, perhaps we should all be making submissions to voice our concern about playing with the incredible blessing freedom of speech has been for western civilization.  As Mark Steyn said to Australian audiences recently; ‘Give me my right to freedom of speech and I will use it to claim my other rights’. Will we defend this fundamental freedom?

You can make your own submission to the Human Rights Commission about the Anti-racism strategy here:


Another Perspective:

Do we hear governments, the mass media, and academia calling for Japan to bring in millions of non-Japanese people and assimilate with them because they’re “not diverse enough”?
Why are they doing this in ALL and ONLY White countries?
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% black needs more diversity.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% asian needs more diversity.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% oriental needs more diversity.
They are already 100% diverse.
All white neighborhoods and only white neighborhoods always need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no white people left in them.
Diversity is a codeword for white genocide.
Anti-whites say there is this RACE problem. Anti-whites say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
Anti-whites say the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
This is a policy of White genocide.
“Anti-racist” is code-word for anti-white.
Diversity and Multiculturalism are codewords for WHITE GENOCIDE

We have massive immigration into all white countries, and it is only being forced on white countries. We have forced integration of all these non-whites. Anti-whites call themselves anti-racists and promote intermarriage and condemn people who oppose intermarriage. And then they talk about a brown future in formerly white countries.
YOU ANTI-WHITES are part of this program of genocide against my race, the white race.
We must never protect White people in their view. They are anti-white.

Asia for the Asians. Africa for the Africans. White countries for everybody. It isn’t an African problem. Nobody is flooding Africa with non-Africans and giving them affirmative action, special rights and privileges and free health care. Only white countries are doing this. Only white leaders are supporting this. Only white children are suffering from it. It is genocide.

Funny how the “Melting Pot” agenda is being pushed in EVERY white nation on the face of planet earth.

No one says “Japan” needs to become a “Melting Pot”.

No one says China, Africa, Mexico, Haiti, or Israel should be deluged with massive random, foreign populations to demonstrate how “moral” they are, or to “enrich” their sorely lacking culture.
It’s a program to eliminate white people from existence, plain and simple.
It’s a form of Genocide under International Law.


Anti-Whites say there should be no White Countries ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Towns ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Neighbourhoods ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Schools✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Classes ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Sports ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Anything ✓
Anti-Whites say there should be no Whites
Anti racism is a code word for anti White.

3 thoughts on “Racism: Lets Take a Real Close Look!”

  1. I always found this obsession with the exact position of skin tone on the brown scale.
    I enjoyed the “How whites took over America” cartoon, because it was well made and funny, but it still did not make sense in a “hue” fashion.

    Marching into someones village and kicking them out is ethically dubious regardless of skin, hair or eye colour. Maybe we should all start working on a fake tan?

  2. When you mean white you mean SAXON?

    I’m an south american and white. My ancestors are from Europe. I can live whatever I want… Africa, South America, USA. I don’t mind if my neighbor is differente color.

    I like diversity because mixed woman are hotter and has few diseases, due the bloody mix.

  3. @Luis,

    The vast majority of the people here don’t give a f**ck, about race. It is about cultural implications and the shift of stable productive societies to shit holes. Which is not a hateful statement, but based on factual examples of countries found throughout Africa, M.E., Asia and South America. And in cities in America and Europe, like Detroit, Chicago, Southall, Luton, etc., etc. Where ever non-whites/westerners are in the majority, societies breakdown and corruptions runs rampant. I object to the lack of social and cultural values found in what Professor Francis Fukuyama calls ‘low trust’ societies. Nor do, I want to live within such chaotic and lawless societies.

    The only one who implied race supremacy was you. The larger question is why do YOU assume hate is present in an honest conversation about racism against white people? When non-whites have clearly stated that they will go out of their way to punish whites.

    Since your primary focus is clearly finding a desirable shag, this site is too taxing for your mental capabilities.

Comments are closed.