Is Black Caucus Commie Al Green a Bagman For the MuBro's and CAIR?

In the tradition of  “Did Guam tip over yet?

No Joke:

Texas’ Al Green, the grandson of a Christian minister, calls for hearings on “radical Christians”

Obviously Green is one of those 80 + commies  in congress who call themselves ‘progressives’, according to Allan West.

Green: Furious and self-righteous myopia

Update:

Recent jihad plotters include Naser Abdo, the would-be second Fort Hood jihad mass murderer; Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; Nidal Hasan, the successful Fort Hood jihad mass-murderer; Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; Naveed Haq, the jihad mass murderer at the Jewish Community Center in Seattle; Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Ahmed Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh, who hatched a jihad plot to blow up a Manhattan synagogue; and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber.

All of them and many others invoked the Qur’an and Sunnah to explain and justify their deeds.

Recent “radical Christian” acts of violence committed by people who invoked the Bible and Church teaching to explain and justify their deeds include, uh, gimme a minute…

“During anti-Muslim hearing, Dem calls for ‘hearing on the radicalization of Christians,’” by David Edwards for Raw Story, June 20:

I’m guessing, just guessing, that mr Al Green is a bagman for Sowdi Barbaria. Am I the only one suspecting that CAIR & the MuBro’s are whispering in his ear (and fill his pockets with green?)

We need more ‘scientists’ to figure out why Muselmaniacs hate us

Perhaps we should hire them straight from NASA, which the Obamster has turned into a Muselmanic ‘outreach’ centre to make Muslims feel good about their chronic underachievement.

CNS is ever so coy:  Study Offers a New Take on Why Some Muslims Hate America

This  new study, published in Cambridge University Press’ American Political Science Review and released Wednesday  was produced by   Lisa Blaydes of Stanford University’s department of political science, and Drew Linzer of Emory University’s department of political science.   I dare say this ‘study’ is not worth the paper its written on.

4 thoughts on “Is Black Caucus Commie Al Green a Bagman For the MuBro's and CAIR?”

  1. In islam, muhammad even murdered allah.
    he said:
    no more information from allah.
    allah have no spirit
    allah no more speak.
    conclusion.
    in islam, allah is dead!
    by who?
    by muhammad himself.
    (translated)

  2. Just quietly…”underachievement.” No plural needed. Even if there were, there would be no apostrophe. When you are talking about underachievement, it’s better to use at least primary-school grammar…just saying…

  3. Robert Spencer: Investigate Radical Christianity!

    In PJMedia today I take up Congressman Al Green’s call: investigate the radical Christians!

    During last week’s House Homeland Security Committee hearing on “The Radicalization of Muslim-Americans,” Congressman Al Green (D-TX) took issue with the hearing’s focus on Islam and Muslims, asking the witnesses testifying before the Committee: “If you agree that radicalization exists within all religions to some extent, would you kindly extend a hand into the air.” Noting triumphantly that “all the hands are raised,” Green then asked: “Why not have a hearing on the radicalization of Christians?”
    The immediate answer is obvious. On the one hand we have recent jihad plotters in the U.S., including Naser Abdo, the would-be second Fort Hood jihad mass murderer; Khalid Aldawsari, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; Muhammad Hussain, the would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad bomber in Portland; Nidal Hasan, the successful Fort Hood jihad mass-murderer; Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad mass-murderer; Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military recruiting station jihad murderer; Naveed Haq, the jihad mass murderer at the Jewish Community Center in Seattle; Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar, the would-be jihad mass murderer in Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Ahmed Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh, who hatched a jihad plot to blow up a Manhattan synagogue; and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas airplane jihad bomber.

    All of them and many others invoked the Qur’an and Sunnah to explain and justify their deeds.

    And on the other hand, we have recent “radical Christian” acts of violence committed by people who invoked the Bible and Church teaching to explain and justify their deeds, including — no one at all. Not one. Even the much-vaunted abortion clinic bombers number only a handful, versus nearly 19,000 jihad attacks around the world since 9/11, and have been repudiated by all Christian sects and leaders — as opposed to the many Islamic authorities that teach jihad warfare against unbelievers and exhort their faithful to commit acts of violent jihad.

    Rosie O’Donnell enunciated the idea memorably a few years ago: “radical Christianity is just as dangerous as radical Islam.” Since then, this has become a commonplace of mainstream media political discourse — remarkably enough, since it has absolutely no evidence to back it up.

    Emblematic of how hard it is to find a “radical Christian” — that is, someone driven to violence by the teachings of Christianity, as opposed to genuinely radical Christians like Mother Teresa and the Amish — is that when Green spoke about “the radicalization of Christianity,” he was actually referring to Islamic jihadists, not to Christians at all.

    This became clear when he said: “I do not, not — N-O-T — oppose hearings on radicalization. I do oppose hearings that don’t focus on the entirety of radicalization. And if you agree that we have Christians, as has been mentioned by more than one member, Christians who become radicalized, they become part of Islam and they become radicalized as is being said, why not have a hearing on the radicalization of
    Christians?”

    Green’s statement is fundamentally incoherent. “Christians who become radicalized” and “become part of Islam” are not Christians at all, but converts to Islam. Thus a hearing on the radicalization of Muslims, and possibly of converts to Islam, would be needed, not a hearing on the radicalization of Christians….

    There is more.

Comments are closed.