Things people say….

By Cheradenine Zakalwe

Sharia4Belgium tells Belgians to piss off to the North Pole or accept islam:

“We Don’t Have an Ounce of Respect for You, Heathens! Our Way of Life is Superior to Yours!”

“If you don’t accept Muslims and Sharia, move house! You can go to the North Pole with all the other heathens or somewhere else. Either you accept, or else you shoot yourself. It’s very simple.”

France: Jews Under Attack

“Attackers appear to be of north African origin”

“Not a week passes without anti-Semitic assaults in France. I refuse to believe Jews will be forced to choose between security and their Jewish identity.”–Joël Mergui, president of a an umbrella organization working to coordinate local Jewish communities…. (Source)

Belgium: Sharia4Belgium Demonstrates Supremacy

MEMRI TV:

Al-Qaeda Flags Waved at Islamist Demonstration on the Streets of Bonn

“Stay in your homes, you Nazis”

“We are here to show those Nazis that we are defending the profit Muhammad…”

“It is shameful that the attempt has been made to transform the victim into the perpetrator…. We have been stigmatized as though we have initiated a civil war,”— Markus Beisicht, PRO/NRW

GERMANY:

4 thoughts on “Things people say….”

  1. aha … Now I understand what this site is trying to do

    I won’t bother you any more with my comments … Cuz every one here are already made up their minds that “Muslims are the Bad Guys”

    Lil I can do about that
    If you really wanted to know the truth … Try to join in a “debate”-like kinda websites

  2. Yep, the mind is made up. The empirical data is in. Case closed.

    Decent Muslims are aberrations to the norm that is the typical Muslim hatefulness both open and subversiveness and are most likely Apostates.

    No one here is interested in what your peddling, why don’t you go to Green Peace and Amnesty International, maybe Peta. They might be naive enough to buy it.

    “Our Way of Life is Superior to Yours!” Ha. That is almost as good as the story of the village that shot itself up over a couple of asses, the donkey, not the people. Although, after the way events turned out it’s hard to decide who was the real arse.

  3. Rami,
    What is your problem? You people make open and violent attacks against us and you expect us to tolerate this?? BTW what would of happened to the muslim thug who forms the centerpiece of this story if he had opened his foul mouth in a muslim country and denigrated those people in a similar manner?? Answer – he would be dead. I suspect you think that this is a measure of strength, but our society is beyond your primitive understanding and you people continually abuse our society in an obvious attempt to destroy it and replace it with the backwards violence that is islam. NO THANK YOU.

    As “Hill” notes, the empirical evidence strongly supports the notion that muslims are violent thugs who are undeserving of any assistance, who present a grave threat to the people of any nation, that muslims are rather stupid with an uncommon lack of analytical ability and judgement (read this carefully – it is not a compliment), and who are in the process of trying to force us to accept their third class society because they are incapable of understanding our society. Come and dispute this Rami, and we can show you many examples of where muslim behavior is simply reprehewnsible and where this behaviour has been justified by muslim using islam.

    You clearly have not understood what this site is trying to do, and the fact that you took so long to reach an incorrect understanding speaks volumes for your lack of intellect. And pray tell, what is your definition of debate, because all this site does is report muslim misbehavior – the debate occurs when thje source of this behaviour is analysed, and the debate does not start by using dishonesty and disclaiming all responsibility for your actions – the typical muslim game. The vast majority of muslim who “contribute” here have demonstated a total inability to critiuc islam, and a total unawareness and unwillingness to accept their responsibility in the violence they promulgate. So what is the definition of debate under these self imposed boundaries!!!?? There can be no debate with you morons because you are incapable of (and unwilling to) debabting the issues at hand. This is seen in EVERY published interview with muslim “leaders”.

    Now thew point of the email is that a muslim insulteds the country that has been feeding him and then threatened its citizens. What is the point you have missed????

  4. Rami,
    What is your problem? You people make open and violent attacks against us and you expect us to tolerate this?? BTW what would of happened to the muslim thug who forms the centerpiece of this story if he had opened his foul mouth in a muslim country and denigrated those people in a similar manner?? Answer – he would be dead. I suspect you think that this is a measure of strength, but our society is beyond your primitive understanding and you people continually abuse our society in an obvious attempt to destroy it and replace it with the backwards violence that is islam. NO THANK YOU.

    As “Hill” notes, the empirical evidence strongly supports the notion that muslims are violent thugs who are undeserving of any assistance, who present a grave threat to the people of any nation, that muslims are rather stupid with an uncommon lack of analytical ability and judgement (read this carefully – it is not a compliment), and who are in the process of trying to force us to accept their third class society because they are incapable of understanding our society. Come and dispute this Rami, and we can show you many examples of where muslim behavior is simply reprehewnsible and where this behaviour has been justified by muslim using islam.

    You clearly have not understood what this site is trying to do, and the fact that you took so long to reach an incorrect understanding speaks volumes for your lack of intellect. And pray tell, what is your definition of debate, because all this site does is report muslim misbehavior – the debate occurs when the source of this behaviour is analysed, and the debate does not start by using dishonesty and disclaiming all responsibility for your actions – the typical muslim game. The vast majority of muslim who “contribute” here have demonstated a total inability to critic islam, and a total unawareness and unwillingness to accept their responsibility in the violence they promulgate. So what is the definition of debate under these self imposed boundaries!!!?? There can be no debate with you morons because you are incapable of (and unwilling to) debabting the issues at hand. This is seen in EVERY published interview with muslim “leaders”.

    Now the point of the email is that a muslim insulted the country that has been feeding him and then threatened its citizens. What is the point you have missed????

Comments are closed.