Huma Abedin, Clinton's "Middle East Policy Advisor"

No wonder the whole ME is falling to the Muslim Brotherhood and Israel gets screwed in the ‘peace process’.

“I have one daughter. But if I had a second daughter, it would [be] Huma,”–  Willary Clinton

Abedin is personally close to Clinton, an ever-present assistant and gatekeeper. She oversees planning and scheduling and advises on politics and policy, especially the Middle East.

Clinton with  ‘Body Woman’- how good is that?

“I’m not sure Hillary could walk out the door without Huma.”—Mandy Grunwald, Clinton advisor.
“Huma does make the trains run on time.”—Bob Barnett, the Clinton’s longtime personal lawyer.
“I don’t know if it’s a chicken-or-the-egg thing—Hillary affecting Huma or the other way around—but together they work.”—Mary Steenburgen, longtime Hillary friend and actress.

Abedin gets security after being threatened by Muslim

Huma Abedin, an aide to Hillary Clinton whose targeting by Michele Bachmann in a State Department letter caused a national firestorm last week, is being given security after a Muslim New Jersey man threatened her, according to the New York Post.

From her wiki page:

Huma Mahmood Abedin (Urdu: هما محمود عابدين) (born 1976) is a deputy chief of staff and aide to US Secretary of StateHillary Rodham Clinton.[1] She served as traveling chief of staff and body woman for Clinton during Clinton’s campaignfor the Democratic nomination in the 2008 presidential election.

Huma Abedin is not the American Dream; she is America’s Mohammedan nightmare!

Bachmann Is Right, McCain Is Wrong on the Muslim Brotherhood in the US Government

McCain made clear that he: had not actually reviewed the curriculum; was unfamiliar with its extensive documentation of a stealthy “civilization jihad” being mounted against this country–Frank Gaffney

McCain is cavalier, lax and sloppy with the facts about the greatest threat facing our nation. Bachmann should be lauded and applauded. And Congress should be pressing for the prosecution of Muslim Brotherhood groups named as such in the captured internal document released during the Holy Land Foundation trial.– Pamela Geller

Huma Abedin and the Muslim Brotherhood: Bachmann vs. McCain by Robert Spencer at FrontPage

Clintons ‘Body Woman’- how about that!


Hillary Clinton Blesses the Brotherhood

Willary assured Muslim Brotherhood top dog M. Morsi that the U.S. would do everything within its power to “support the democratically elected government and to help make it a success in delivering results for the people of Egypt.”  (Don’t mention the Christian Copts!)

Dumb and dense as Duss can be. 

Mathew Duss is a mental case.

Soros sponsered ‘Think Progress’ agit-prop Matt Duss  sees “American-way-of-life threatening conspiracies” and flings feces at Michele Bachmann and Frank Gaffney: Frank Gaffney’s Latest Boogeyman Inspired Bachmann’s Witch Hunt

Diana West has more:

There is one operative word in Andy McCarthy’s illuminating examination of some of the facts obscured by the weird and racuous apotheosis of Huma Abedin currently enlivening the hysterical demonization of Rep. Michele Bachmann by the media and John McCain, a grotesque and shameful display triggered by a question — one question — Bachmann and four other House Republicans have raised about Abedin’s close family connections to the rapacious Islamic supremacist group, the Muslim Brotherhood.

That word is “adults.”

Having outlined these connections, which are not, the former federal prosecutor writes, “contrived or weightless,” McCarthy notes it’s not “a crime to have close relatives who are either members of, or associated with members of such an organization. Again, however,” he patiently explains, “no one is accusing Huma Abedin of a crime.”

He continues:

The five House conservatives instead are asking questions that adults responsible for national security should feel obliged to ask: In light of Ms. Abedin’s family history, is she someone who ought to have a security clearance, particularly one that would give her access to top-secret information about the Brotherhood? Is she, furthermore, someone who may be sympathetic to aspects of the Brotherhood’s agenda, such that Americans ought to be concerned that she is helping shape American foreign policy?

These are rational questions. The fact that such questions now require a painstaking defense is a measure of how berserk — how subverted — our reasoning powers have become. The fact that such questions are only now being asked by just five House members is a measure of how very few adults hold positions of authority in our government. (NB: It is this same subversion of reasoning powers that led me to write my new book, American Betrayal, which became a “prequel” of sorts to The Death of the Grown-Up.)

The bottom line here is that adults responsible for national security have an urgent obligation to ask these questions — to bang the table and demand answers and oversight on what could well be a longstanding chink in our national security armor in the person always at the side of the Secretary of State — Abedin — who is also the daughter and sister of people variously aligned with an international movementdedicated to the destruction of Western civlization. There are rules about this, after all, in the State Department’s own code (see the section of Foreign Influence). Rather than uncover the facts of the matter, rather than seek even minimal clarification from the two public servants in question — Clinton and Abedin — the media have instead dropped all pretense at fact-finding, all responsibility for reporting, and have instead formed an impermeable phalanx around the two women, protecting them from questions and shutting down efforts to get facts to their viewers and readers.

For shame.

It is an extraordinary operation to behold: the extinguishment of the first flickers of inquiry into whether, once again, there is an ideological enemy within — agents or dupes of a foreign movement seeking to subvert US policy from inside the halls of government. We know for a fact from extensive archival confirmation that this happened before with the Soviet-directed infiltration of literally hundreds of agents and thousands more fellow-travelers and useful fools working from within to promote Moscow’s war on Washington. It is no accident that the witnesses and investigators who tried to expose what they knew sixty years ago suffered the same cauterizing reception from the Establishment that Bachmann is experiencing today. The Establishment, then and now, fears the exposure of facts — sunshine — will reveal what is at best its members’ gross incompetence. This might take them from the seat of power, which they love more than anything.

And so the muck flies — at Michele Bachmann. She has the audacity, in their eyes, of asking for information that the American people have every right to know. Her character-assassins in the media, in her own party, committ the very crime they falsely accuse her of: slandering without facts. House Speaker John Boehneractually admitted he hadn’t read Bachmann’s query letter but saw fit to denounce Bachmann anyway for “throwing around” accusations that were “pretty damgerous.” John McCain, the man who last year called AQ-linked Libyan forces his “heroes,“  erroneously stated on the Senate floor that Bachmann’s concerns — “sinister accusations,” he luridly called them — “rest solely on a few unspecified and unsubstantiated associations of members of Huma’s family.” (Again, as Andy McCarthy lays out here, “the ties of Ms. Abedin’s father, mother, and brother to the Muslim Brotherhood are both specific and substantiated.”) Bachmann’s former campaign manger, Ed Rollins, penned a poisonous screed for Fox News that is notable mainly for its historical illiteracy:

Having worked for Congressman Bachman’s campaign for president, I am fully aware that she sometimes has difficulty with her facts, but this is downright vicious and reaches the late Senator Joe McCarthy  level. (Joe McCarthy falsely made claims that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies inside the State Department in the early 1950’s. On December 2, 1954, the Senate voted to “condemn” McCarthy on  two counts.)

Contrary to Rollins and the echo chamber that has ignorantly taken up “McCarthyism” as a sledgehammer,  Joe McCarthy was correct, as the historical record, meticulously and copiously salvaged and reconstructed by M. Stanton Evans in Blacklisted by History, proves.

But what is proof in 21st-century America? The dark theme energing here is that facts, history, evidence are of no concern to leaders in our public square today. This is an existential problem, a crisis, one that is taking our country down. It will require a showing from many more “adults” than five House Republicans to put things to rights. There is no time to waste.

The first order of business is to support  Reps. Bachmann, Franks. Gohmert, Rooney and Westmoreland in their efforts to investigate whether the Muslim Brotherhood, through its identified domestic front groups, has gained influence over US policy.

Save Our Adults.


4 thoughts on “Huma Abedin, Clinton's "Middle East Policy Advisor"”

  1. “I have one daughter. But if I had a second daughter, it would [be] Huma,”– says Shrillary Clinton

    Shades of Barry HUSSEIN Soetero saying of the Black gold toothed Gangsta Wannabe Druggy THUG Trayvon Martin saying ‘If I had a son he would look like Trayvon’
    What is with these morons praising and IDENTIFYING with the most INAPPROPRIATE people that you could do if you REALLY cared for the American Society

  2. Oh! wait I get it Shrillary and Barry HUSSEIN Soetero Kardashian are out to DESTROY American society not protect it. Now it makes sense.

Comments are closed.