The Savage vs the Civilised Man

Muslims know they are savages. That’s why they go apeshit over Pamela Gellers ad campaign:

We love you, Pamela! You are a true hero!

VIDEO: Pamela Geller on NBC News report on AFDI’s “Islamorealism” ads

The NBC report video is incredibly biased and pro-islamic.  These fools call the billboard message “hateful” and “offensive”, but they can’t deny that there have been  20,000 islamic jihadist attacks since 9/11. If that’s not hateful and offensive, I don’t know what is!

Pamela Geller on NBC News: Report on the “Islamorealism” counter jihad ads

Savages They Are!

‘Jihad Ads’ Appearing on San Francisco Buses — And They Aren’t Coming Down

“In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.”Read More »

“In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad,” reads a controversial ad displayed in San Francisco’s Municipal Railway buses.

And as of now, despite the outcry, it’s not coming down.

“Muni officials spoke on Wednesday, addressing the ads purchased by the American Freedom Defense Initiative [which, of course, has been labelled a “hate group”] that contains a message that has been called ‘anti-Islam’ by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL),” CBS San Franciscoreports.

Not surprising: People accusing the “Pro-Israel” advertisements of inciting hatred against Islam and demanding that they be removed (in the name of “tolerance,” of course).

Surprising: Muni refusing to remove the ads.

President of the Transportation Board Tom Nolan, who believes the ads are “offensive,” says removing them gives way to other problems.

“What could happen here if we take them all down [is] we could be taken to court and [there] would be a big cost associated with that and we could be forced — I guess like New York, to put them back up anyway,” Nolan told CBS San Francisco.

It all comes down to this:

How the Mustards present themselves:

2 thoughts on “The Savage vs the Civilised Man”

  1. As the plastic bag banning / gay marriage pushing Labor government in the Australian Capital Territory prepares to inflict Sahria law on its hapless citizens the local rag has has a piece by the knowledgeable Lisa Cox. Previously she described a UK politician who stands up for homosexual rights as a far-right agitator (becaus ehe also stands up for Israel) and this time she describes the pastor leading the fight against the mosque as having ‘stridently pro-Israel views’, according to his friends. Goodness what his enemies say about him. I wonder how the wise Lisa would describe anyone with just ‘pro-Israel’ views. I suspect having pro-Israel views by definition makes one strident have strident pro-Israel. In other words if one is pro-Israel then one is assumed to be an extremist but if one is an anti-Israel Muslim then one is assumed to be moderate entitled to protection by the ACT government who are looking for ways to stop extremists.

  2. Of course some people will object to messages on billboards exposing the evils of Islam. This is becaue some people do find the truth to be offensive

Comments are closed.