Salafist men wear beards, hand out copies of the Koran and cause headaches for Germany’s domestic intelligence agency. But how do the women feel? SPIEGEL spends a weekend with two veiled women and learns about their vision of a perfect world.
Saliha and Reyhana stop at a kebab shop on the Bornheimer Strasse in the Bad Godesberg. “Can we pray here?” Saliha asks.
“Sure, okay,” says an employee.
The two women walk into the shop and unroll a makeshift prayer rug on the floor. The employee continues putting away chairs. It’s 9 p.m., and he wants to close. Saliha uses the compass on her iPhone to determine the direction of Mecca.
It points in the direction behind the kebab shop, where the ICE high-speed trains pass through Bonn. The two women kneel down on the floor to pray. They are wearing gloves and the niqab, a veil with narrow slits for the eyes. Cars pass by in the darkness outside. For the people out there, these women are the brides of terrorists.
Did Hillary take Muslim Brotherhood operative Huma Abedin to the Netanyahu meeting?
The Infidel Blogger’s Alliance has posted a photo taken by Haaretz’s Barak Ravid that purports to be Secretary of State Hillary Clinton – with Huma Abedin in tow – arriving at the Regency Hotel in New York for Clinton’s meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
So, in addition to Barack Obama slapping Netanyahu in the face by sending Hillary instead of going himself, the Secretary of State takes along a woman with extensive familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood?
It doesn’t matter what side of the Huma Abedin debate you come down on, the optics of this one aren’t good.
How about some concern on the part of the hypocritical Obamunists for loosening draconian regulations on small business, the engine of the economy, in the U.S., small business which Obama is going out of his way to destroy in favor of populating his government dole?
Just yesterday Muslims on Twitter were excoriating me for my “ignorance,” “lies” and “hate” for saying that according to the Islamic texts that Muslims consider most reliable, Muhammad consummated his marriage with Aisha when he was 54 and she was nine.
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).” — Bukhari 7.62.88
Muslims take this seriously and imitate Muhammad in this.
One of the reasons why Barack Obama is regarded as the greatest orator of our age is that he’s always banging on about some other age yet to come – e.g., the Future! A future of whose contours he is remarkably certain and boundlessly confident: The future will belong to nations that invest in education because the children are our future, but the future will not belong to nations that do not invest in green energy projects because solar-powered prompters are our future, and, most of all, the future will belong to people who look back at the Obama era and marvel that there was a courageous far-sighted man willing to take on the tough task of slowing the rise of the oceans because the future will belong to people on viable land masses. This futuristic shtick is a cheap’n’cheesy rhetorical device (I speak as the author of a book called “After America,” whose title is less futuristic than you might think) but it seems to play well with the impressionable Obammysoxers of the press corps. Continue reading →
The media has been all over the story, with pundits lining up to condemn the advertisement. Most of the posters have now been defaced by activists, who plastered them with stickers saying, “Racism” and “Hate speech.”
“Activists”: the left’s euphemism for thugs and vandals.
Geller rejected the argument that people have a right to deface the posters.
“Vandalism and thuggery are not freedom of expression. If she [Eltahawy] had bought her own ad, that would be freedom of expression. Destroying mine is just a fascist attempt to deny my freedom of speech,” she said. “We plan to roll out these ads everywhere we can.”
United States President Barack Obama addressed the United Nations General Assembly this past week, on September 25, 2012. During his remarks on his country’s role in international relations, Obama, in the midst of his comments otherwise within the mainstream of American discussions, proclaimed that the “future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” This single phrase entails deeply disturbing implications for the defense of free speech critical of Islam against multiplying threats from various adherents of this faith. This statement also introduces intellectual confusion into the rest of Obama’s remarks extolling individual freedom while condemning bigotry and insults. This philosophical quagmire ultimately is resolvable only through reflection upon Obama’s presumed future troubling policy course.
Al Reuters & Associated (with terrorists) Press depict Nethanyahu as Nazi for trying to prevent another holocaust
Among the most alarmingly psychotic propaganda you will see from the Muslim–moonbat alliance are attempts to equate Israelis with Nazis. In light of the Holocaust, and the second Holocaust that threatens to unfold as Iran acquires nuclear weapons, nothing could be more absurd or more obscene.
Speaking of absurd and obscene, here’s a shot Associated Press chose to illustrate Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to the United Nations yesterday:
Kudos to AP and Reuters propagandists for their patience. They must have had to sift through hundreds of photos of the speech before finding gestures that look like Nazi salutes to send out on the wire.
“These Islamophobic acts stand in violation of the freedom of religion and belief, guaranteed by international human rights instruments, and have deeply offended” Muslims around the world, the statement added.
Islamic Bangladesh refuses to take in what are largely descendants from that land. The Bangladesh government(s) are complicit in the expulsion of millions of Hindus and have taken over the Buddhist Chittagong Hills, replacing its population with Muslim invaders.
So given the expulsion and supplanting of others the country still wont even accomodate its Bengali speaking Rohingyas?
Very similar to the phoney Fakestinians, who are refused refuge by their Arab brothers, and left at the mercy of ‘the international community’, which is clueless and stupid enough to keep throwing billions of dollars at those parasites.
Repeat after me: “the world’s most persecuted minorities”, ad nauseam.
The ‘Rohingya people‘ lie is repeated on end, in the hope that bleeding hearts will believe it and come to the rescue. The ‘Rohingya’ are an invention, just like the ‘Palestinians’, Arab Muslims who terrorise the Jews in their ancestral homeland. Here the Muslims are infil-traitors, Bengali invaders, but the Buddhists have wizened up to their game plan.
Myanmar does not want them. But neither does neighbouring Bangladesh, the country with the second-largest concentration of the Rohingya.
They are Bangladeshi Muslim. Let their muslim brothers take care of them!