Denouncing Jihad Is ‘Hate Speech’?

Savage Stupidity:

Responding to controversial New York subway ads denouncing “jihad,” the United Methodist Women’s organization is placing counter ads against “hate speech.”

“We all need to leave off the ‘savage’ language and the mindset that is behind it,” according to a HuffPo columnist.  “Instead Americans need to double down on the strength of our country which is our commitment to pluralism and respect of the other.”  But how then to describe and react to terrorists and jihadists who reject pluralism and murderously disrespect “the other”?   The Religious Left critics of the New York subway ads offer no answer.  Instead, like United Methodist Women, they only denounce those who try for their supposed “hate speech.”

These people are insane.

Raving Koranimals  in L.A.

America bad, Islam good:

Muhammad is the air that we breathe, allahu akbar!

Slavery is freedom; Muhammad liberated women, you invaded this country, slaughtered the Indians, you have weapons, and you don’t want others to have them to defend themselves….

“By acting like this you are turning this country into a jungle that human being cannot live in…”

Remember: only muslims are ‘human’, unbelievers are worse than beasts; sons of apes & swine, the ‘vilest of creatures…’

‘A Word To Rioting Muslims’: Anti-Islam Rant Of The Year

That’s a fact:

7 thoughts on “Denouncing Jihad Is ‘Hate Speech’?”

  1. To thank for the Mohammadan invasion in Australia you can give a HUGE HUG to the Christian churches as well.

    Main stream Anglican churches, Catholic, the whole bloody lot in the Sth East of Melbourne are sponsoring illegals that are flooding into this country.

    Guess what, they’re proud of it too.

  2. Legion of Dhim-wits: “We must all learn to be better victims! Whee!”

    Strangely enough, though, I agree that Pam shouldn’t call moslems or even jihadis, “savages;” instead, I think the next round of ads should say “BARBARIANS” in stead of ‘savages,’ and here’s why:

    “Savages” are basically clueless and innocent, untutored – like hapless animals in a pristine habitat. But BARBARIANS, on the other hand, are well aware of the norms of Civilization (based on the Golden Rule of Law which defines all situational morality quite simply as “Do Not Attack First”) and consciously REJECT them all, in favor of expressing their self-proclaimed, and only alleged, criminal “right” to remain irresponsibly wrong, and to ALWAYS attack all ‘The Others’ first, in the name of their idolatrous excuse of an us-versus-them, might-makes-right and equally criminal ‘god!’

  3. Everything the filmmaker made his buffoonish “Muhammad” say and do is SUNNAH and HALAL – it’s all exactly what the most official moslem sources in the Qur’an and ahadith say he said and did LOL! It’s all completely ACCURATE!

    And even it’s disjointed, overdubbing qualities echo the Qur’an, which is out of chronological order and prone to interjecting nonsensical exclamations and irrelevant digressions in the middle of any given topic or chapter!

    Besides, out of the tens of thousands of anti-islam vids up on YouTube, they pretend it was THIS ONE alone which “caused” mobs of moslem madmen to bring their rocket-launchers to riot and burn down American embassies worldwide on the anniversary of 911?! Please.

    The most basic question here is simply: “Does anyone have the right to violently physically attack anyone else for merely verbally insulting or disagreeing with them – Yes, or No?”!

    Too many people here are racists who pretend these poor oppressed swarthy ‘People Of Colour’ “moslems” just can’t help acting like violent animals when their idols get insulted, so they really can’t be held responsible for their criminal actions like real human beings would, but instead must be indulged in their crimes like when one ignores the new puppy as it pees on the rugs!

    These holy mobster Moslems only hate infidels because the Qur’an says “god” orders them to – Period.

    Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.

    All moslems are criminals because, by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.

    And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.

    1. “Does anyone have the right to violently physically attack anyone else for merely verbally insulting or disagreeing with them – Yes, or No?”

      Mona Eltahawy, modern, educated, liberal muslima in NYC, obviously thinks so. She thinks vandalism is free speech.

Comments are closed.