O'turd @ the UN: "The future must not belong to those who slander the profit of Islam"

And profit they will, thanks to Barry Soetoro aka Hussein Obama the fake ‘Christian’.

Zero never was anything other  than a running dog of Islam.

Obama vs. free speech: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”

Obama at the UN today:

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims. It is time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.” Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, and that is the vision we will support.–Full speech here.

More on this soon.

“Absolute” Assholes

Now where might apparatchiks in the Pakistani government that floats along on our tax dollars get the idea that they could intimidate us by putting a bounty on the head of an American citizen? Maybe from seeing this on Pakistani TV:

The Obama Regime paid $70,000 of our money for the ad spots.

It will take a generation to live down the disgrace of an American Secretary of State groveling and pandering before hostile savages.

Meanwhile, even the White House now admits the obvious: the video Shrillary so obsequiously denounces did not cause the violence. (Moonbattery)

In other news:

Madonna: vote for the “black Muslim” in the White House!

Via The Atlantic & GWP:

Madonna compared Barack Obama to Abe Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. in a crazy rant during her concert last night and asked everyone to vote for the “black Muslim” in the White House.

6 thoughts on “O'turd @ the UN: "The future must not belong to those who slander the profit of Islam"”

  1. A crude and disgusting film said the liar-in-chief at the Unholy Nations. This time he is right: Crude, yes. No oil money funding it. Disgusting yes because it depicts true incidents from Mo’s own life (salted with some satire).

  2. @Bronson.

    “A crude and disgusting film said the liar-in-chief.”

    At the end of the day, who cares if it was crudely made. In the US, good or bad he has the constitutional right to say it. And as many times as he feels like it.

    Furthermore, the hypocrisy that comes out of the ME is laughable considering the plethora of anti-christian, jews, America, Israel and the West cartoons, commercials, tv shows and films that are created almost on a daily basis.

    A bunch of hypocritical whinging babies.

  3. And another thing.

    How the hell can you “slander” a dead person? Who has been dead for over a thousand years?

    Who may not have been even alive or even existed at all?

    Legally, one would think, before slander can be acknowledge, one would have to have proof of life?

Comments are closed.