There will be 'backlash!'

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) reminds us that it is not our business to concern ourselves with those who hurt the “religious feelings” of Muslims, but to uphold our citizens rights to freedom of speech.


The Klintoons: ‘Islam is a great religion’

Huma Abedin’s ‘Svengali-like powers over her lesbian girlfriend at work:

Shrillary despicable as always:

 “Let me state very clearly, and I hope it is obvious, that the United States government had absolutely nothing to do with this video,” she said.

Clinton added that the video is “disgusting and reprehensible”– wanna bet that she never saw it?

Rep. Louie Gohmert  took a shot at President Obama’s foreign policy in an impassioned speech on the House floor Wednesday, slamming the administration’s response to the killings of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, by radical Islamists during an attack on the U.S. embassy in Libya.

“It does not help when an administration in response to American attacks on American Soil and American individuals, the administration ends up asking Americans to give up their First Amendment rights for which our service members are fighting,” Gohmert said. “It doesn’t help when a general asks an American to give up your First Amendment rights rather than proclaiming, ‘We’re the United States military, you have attacked our country, you have attacked our brothers and sisters, and you will pay for that.’”— Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)

After paying tribute to Stevens, Gohmert seemingly lectured the current administration on its duty to protect the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

But what kind of asshole would bend over that far?

Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff calls Qur’an-burning pastor, asks him to practice Sharia-compliant self-censorship

It’s come to this. Even the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff thinks that it if Muslims respond to something with murderous violence, it is up to the non-Muslims to change the way they behave so as to accommodate them. And so eleven years after 9/11, terrorism well and truly won: now if any group wants anything, they know that all they have to do in order to get it is rampage and riot and kill.

Yep, none less than General Martin Dempsey, the same jackass who doesn’t want ‘to be complicit’ if Israel defends itself against an enemy that wants to annihilate every last Jew on the planet.

And that very same lobotomised grinch Dempsey went out on a limb for the Muslim Brotherhood and called  pastor Terry Jones of Koran-burning fame to submit voluntarily to Sharia restrictions on the freedom of speech regarding Islam:  “Top U.S. military officer calls pastor over film,” Reuters, September 12

But that’s not how the federal government responded to the crisis, he explained. After a group of radical Islamists tore apart an American flag at a U.S. consulate in Cairo, the embassy released a statement apologizing for people in America that may have hurt the “religious feelings” of Muslims. To be fair, the White House later released a statement distancing itself from the apology.

“It’s OK to burn a Bible, that’s OK,” Gohmert said, mocking the current administration. “OK to burn a flag, OK, that’s all right,” he continued. “But just, you know, for heaven‘s sake don’t say anything that might offend someone of the Islamic religion.”


Gohmert said he doesn’t encourage anyone to offend Muslims but added that “we should defend ourselves against radical Islamists that want to annihilate this country and destroy our way of life.” President Obama has failed thus far to address the threat of radical Islam, according to Gohmert.

While several U.S. officials and various news reports initially insisted the attacks on the embassy in Libya were because of an anti-Muslim YouTube clip, Gohmert suggested the attack was coordinated and planned to occur on Sept. 11, using the video as a cover to carry out the assault. To back up his claim, he cited a Fox News report. The U.S. government is now investigating whether the attack was indeed planned in advance, according to The New York Times.

The Texas congressman also criticized President Obama for declining an invitation from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to meet when he is in the United States. He suggested Obama squeeze him into his schedule when he’s not playing golf or holding fundraisers.

“We see people in the Middle East begin to have dreams of new Ottoman Empire where everyone will be subjected to some of what we‘ve seen happen in those countries where we helped bring about an Arab Spring that’s turned into a Winter nightmare,” he said. “This is not a time to play petty personal games, to snub leaders of friends, of allies, even when you disagree with them for heaven’s sake.”

He went on: “Take a little time from a fundraiser, take a little time that you don’t go to the golf course and meet with the leader of a country that sees hatred for its people, anti-semitism, the racism, the bigotry growing around the world, who is scared for its own existence, who can‘t be sure that we’re going to be there with them because of the actions of this administration.”

“I mean, it is an inconvenient thing to have to be president when you really are best at running for office,” he said.

11 thoughts on “There will be 'backlash!'”

  1. Following Caroline Glick’s article,

    it is becoming clear, that the attack on the embassy was a planned affair.They brought automatoic weapons and even a grenade launcher. They even to the extent of having a ready made casus belli – the Mohammed video. Then the attack could be blamed on the West for causing offence to Muslims. This is also standard practice – offensive Jihad cannot take place unless sanctioned by the caliph. As there is no caliph, Jihad has to be defensive, which is the reason they will feed to the ulemma and our own useful idiots.

    It is interesting that Egypt’s president Morsi’s (Muslim Brotherhood), our most trusted ally in the ME, first statement on the embassy massacre, was to demand an apology from the US.

  2. Sheikh

    Tomorrows NYT headlines

    Muslims in America fear backlash. Demand increased security for mosques in the US.

  3. “…by radical Islamists(?) during an attack on the U.S. embassy in Libya.”

    i.e. devout Muslims

    ” …And it does not matter what quality the movie has. Whether it is distasteful or offensive. He is covered by the right to freedom of expression. In Europe as in the U.S.. And that goes for Christ in a urinal .

    Backed by nothing is the violation of the grounds of the American embassies in Cairo and Benghazi. The murder of four embassy Sans racks and apparently previous rape of Ambassador Stevens are each an act of war. … ” (Joachim Nikolaus Steinhöfel)

  4. During the demonstration which was held in front of the American Embassy in Cairo on Tuesday, 9/11, a Muslim cleric named Abu Islam tore and burned the Holy Bible in front of thousands of Muslims. His action was met with applause and anti-Christian cheers from the demonstrators. Before leaving the demonstration and getting into his car, he told the crowds “next time I will urinate on it.”

    Should the Christians go on a rampage and kill the Egyptian ambassador and his staff for the desecration of the holy Bible.

Comments are closed.