Benghazi Gate: Those who did fight to defend the Ambassador, did so against orders!

Infamy & High Treason. Arrest. Them. All!

Update:

Obama calls Benghazi al Qaeda attackers “folks”– like the Gitmo apes he calls “folks who need lawyers:”

(Obama renames Islamic terrorists Gitmo ‘folks’–“Sorry band of men” downgraded to “folks who need lawyers”)

“My biggest priority right now is bringing those folks to justice. And I think the American people have seen that’s a commitment I always keep,” the president said, an apparent reference to the bin Laden raid.

The scandal just keeps getting bigger, while the mainstream media tries furiously to distract attention from it.

Obama refused CIA requests for military backup during Benghazi attack

Glenn Beck:

“That’s not America. That’s not who we are! That’s not the way we treat Americans!”–Read More »

CIA Operators Told to ‘Stand Down’ During Attack As 3 Urgent Requests for Military Back-Up Were Denied

Vlad Tepes:  the following news clip is of such staggering importance that I will need to watch it myself a few more times and talk to some serious people before I can grasp it in its totality.

New Explosive Benghazi Allegations:

CIA Operators Told to ‘Stand Down’ During Attack As 3 Urgent Requests for Military Back-Up Were Denied

Father of Ex-Navy Seal Responds to “Stand Down” Order: “Cowardice…We do not need another generation of liars who lack moral strength.”

Willardry: Anti-Islam Video ‘Disgusting And Reprehensible’

Is she a self-appointed movie critic now? Or how much of a fool is she for the Muslim sisterhood?

Willary Clinton on Muhammad filmmaker: “We’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted”

Yep. The Obama-Clinton cabal engineered this ‘speed bump incident’ to do away with freedom of speech. That was the whole purpose of the exercise.

Hillary Clinton on Muhammad filmmaker: “We’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted”

The father of a U.S. military man heard her say this. We now know that when she made this stunning statement about destroying the freedom of speech, she already knew that the Muhammad video had nothing to do with the Benghazi attack, and that it was actually a planned action by Islamic jihadists.

If Obama is reelected, the First Amendment is not long for this world.

7 thoughts on “Benghazi Gate: Those who did fight to defend the Ambassador, did so against orders!”

  1. As I have said elsewhere, heads have to roll. Clintons should be one of the first. Then obunglers. Then some of the czars and generals and advisors to the pres. But you watch. No one will ever be held to an accounting for this traitorous act. Fucking DC clics piss me off. Dirty, worthless, self-serving politicians. Piss. Me. off.

  2. “My biggest priority right now is bringing those folks to justice. And I think the American people have seen that’s a commitment I always keep,” the president said, an apparent reference to the bin Laden raid.”

    Oh, please. Barry is so indecisive. Anything he says and does is pure political opportunism.

    According to journalist Richard Miniter, Obama the Bin Laden slayer, chickened out several times because he was worried about criticism
    if failure occurred.

    This video from C-span is worth listening to regarding the Coward in Chief.

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/307867-1

    Sheik, and in the video with Miniter, he mentions that Obama and his cabal saw Fast and Furious as a means to control the guns (and reduce the 2nd Amendment? IMHO) Despite the fact, that only/less then 1% of all legal guns account for crime across the US. The vast majority are illegal guns, used by criminals and in black on black crime.

  3. Obama on Guns: “working on it”

    With freedom of speech gone, who will prevent this totalitarian government to take your guns on the flimsiest new ‘rules & regulations’- like its all for ‘the greater good’, dontcha know?

  4. There was much else to criticize in Obama’s speech today, most notably a deeply incoherent depiction of America’s role in the world. But it’s certainly worth noting that a president who thought he was making a profound defense of American freedom of speech has continued his administration’s two-week assault on the very notion.

  5. Whose Greater good?

    1.) Who and how is the US is going to enforce the law?

    2.) I am not clear, if Obama administration is successful with the small arms treaty how it can possibly be legal under US law.
    a.) because of the wording of the 2nd Amendment
    b.) Although, I cannot find it at this moment (if anyone knows it and can direct me, I would be grateful). I am confident that their is a American law that prohibits foreign entity from having law(s) that supersedes US law on American soil, and it cannot legally be forced upon Americans.
    c.) However, if I understand the Constitutional law correctly, a sneaky international treaty to a certain degree can. But, to my understanding, not if it diminishes the Constitutional law.

    3.) Which leads me to my next question how could the UN enforce it? With UN peace keepers? That is a foreign army, thus an act of war. Which was the whole point of the 2nd Amendment.

Comments are closed.