Foxtards cannot get themselves to say 'SAVAGES'

You can’t say “savage” on Fox News Channel.

Thought Police on Fox

This morning, Jamie Colby, a Fox News anchor, explained to the audience that she could not bring herself to quote the ad, formulated by Pamela Geller, which, upon a judge’s orders, is now placed on subways in NYC and other venues.  For Ms. Colby, the words (later described as “fighting words” by her guests) were simply unmentionable in polite company. I gather from the ad that the word “savage” (along with “savages”?) takes its place with F-bombs and other evil expletives.  (Pamela Geller)

What is at issue here is the ongoing victory of the forces of political correctness. The ad in contention nowhere says that all Muslims are enemies of Israel; rather it singles out jihadists, about whose intentions to wipe Israel off the map, no one should be in doubt.

Read the rest.

As a side-note, I just watched Mike Huckabee on Fox playing a clip of Obama’s ‘spiritual advisor’ Jeremiah Wright, the famous ‘God damned America’ one, and the idiots bleeped exactly that out. WTF is news worth when it doesn’t report the fuggly reality?


Libtards are savage too:

“Pamela Geller has broken the code”

Newsday: Pro-freedom ads should come down because they might anger jihadis

Yet another dhimmi commentator counsels submission to violent intimidation. Has everyone in the entire country forgotten that the only one responsible for one’s actions is oneself? Has the entire world lost sight of the fact that if Muslims commit violence because of this ad or over any other pretext, the fault and responsibility will be theirs and theirs alone?

Joseph Dolman wants us to be silent, submissive slaves lest we anger our Muslim masters. What is even worse is that Newsday prints this suicidal nonsense.

“Dolman: Anti-jihad ads in subway may be legal, but they lack street-smarts,” by Joseph Dolman for Newsday, September 24:

The unwritten code of the subway says that when a situation is fraught with danger, you never want to escalate it. You never want to challenge the angry-looking guy who’s staring at you from across the aisle and muttering under his breath. Is Armageddon erupting in his head? You don’t want to find out.Today I’m upset with Pamela Geller because she has broken the code. She has an ad going up in 10 New York subway stations that reads: “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.” As a New Yorker who was present in Manhattan on 9/11, I can promise you, I don’t like jihadists any more than she does.

But is it really wise to bait them? Right now? After what has happened in Egypt, Libya and Lower Manhattan (more than once)?…

We should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions we loathe and believe fraught with death, unless they pose such an imminent threat that an immediate check is required to save the country, wrote Justice Oliver Wendell Homes Jr. Who can say with certainty what the effect of Geller’s signs will be?

The issue isn’t the law. It’s common sense. Why bring this intractable psychodrama to the subway? Life is tough enough.

4 thoughts on “Foxtards cannot get themselves to say 'SAVAGES'”

  1. Meanwhile, over at CBS, the return of their flagship series The Good Wife is replete with O ba ma background posters and messages. I won’t be watching that series any more.

  2. Obviously self censoring Fox News believes that Jihad is NOT savage, that killing in the name of allah is a merciful, kind and loving act…..oooooh , look out for that dreadful word savage! but behead those who insult islam is just fine..kill the infidel too, thats okay and is perfectly civilised… Oh well, they are part owned by a Saudi royal, are they not?

  3. I think Winston Churchill said it best.


    “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!

    Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as

    hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The

    effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly

    systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity

    of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

    A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement;

    the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law

    every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property either

    as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of

    slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among


    Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of

    the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

    No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being

    moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has

    already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at

    every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the

    strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly

    struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the

    civilization of ancient Rome.”

    Sir Winston Churchill (The River War, first edition,

    Vol. II, pages 248-50

Comments are closed.