Sowdi Barbarians in Meltdown Over Anti-Islam Flick, Demand Censorship

Saudi Arabia calls for new international body to censor Internet of content critical of Islam

“Any reasonable person would know that this film would foment violence and, indeed, many innocent persons have died and been injured with this film as a root cause.” No. Any reasonable person would address the madness of reacting violently to this film, and would address the core beliefs that lead to that behavior.

“Anti-Islam film prompts Saudi call for net censorship body,” from the Telegraph, thanks to TT & JW:

Here we are again with a  silly flick hardly anyone has seen. But that’s hardly the issue here: what matters  is that the Obamster and his Muslim advisors tried to use this video to cover up Benghazi Gate, in order to  do away with the first amendment; our G-d-given right of free speech.

Saudi Arabia has called for a new international body to censor the internet, in the wake of the anti-Islam YouTube clip that recently sparked violence in the Middle East.

In a submission to forthcoming international talks on internet governance, the Gulf state said “there is a crying need for international collaboration to address ‘freedom of expression’ which clearly disregards public order”.

Anti Free Speech Mustards March in Halifax  (Mullah)


During the controversy over a 14-minute clip posted on YouTube and purportedly a trailer for a feature film called “The Innocence of Muslims”, Google resisted pressure, including from the White House, to remove it.

“This video – which is widely available on the web – is clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube,” Google said last month.

The Saudi government has now told the World Telecommunications Policy Forum, a UN body, that the incident was “an obvious example” of the need for greater international cooperation to restrict content online.

“Any reasonable person would know that this film would foment violence and, indeed, many innocent persons have died and been injured with this film as a root cause,” the Saudi submission said.

The amateurish clip, produced on tiny budget by Nakoula Nakoula, a 55-year-old Egyptian Coptic Christian resident in the United States, depicts the Prophet Mohammad as a fool and sexual deviant.

In the uproar surrounding it, there were violent protests in across the Middle East and North Africa, coinciding with an attack by extremists on the American Embassy in Benghazi. The Ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and three other officials were killed.

Following the attack Google did restrict access to “The Innocence of Muslims” clip in Egypt and Libya on account of “the very difficult situation”, but maintained its refusal to delete it. The governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan meanwhile ordered internet providers to completely cut off access to YouTube.

The Saudi government called for greater international cooperation to censor such material at the source, comparing it to outlawed content such as images of child abuse and malicious software.

Notorious pedophiles hiding behind laws for child pornography:

“This behaviour, along with other malicious and criminal activities such as child pornography, identity theft, spam, denial of service attacks, and malware aimed at destroying or crippling businesses, inter alia, must be addressed by states in a collaborative and cooperative environment and strongly underscores the need for enhanced cooperation,” it said.

The submission highlights increasing interest in internet governance discussions from nations that do not share Western liberal values, as access to and the influence of the web grows.

4 thoughts on “Sowdi Barbarians in Meltdown Over Anti-Islam Flick, Demand Censorship”

  1. Thanks, Gramfan.

    Yes, this guy is all over the place and I keep getting this link; unfortunately he is the odd one out; like Zuhdi Yasser he has no support anywhere and making him a super star in the west just creates more delusional hope’n change.

    Ignore it, no one cares.

  2. These Saudomites are such hypocrites! I’m betting kiddie-porn is completely halal, sunnah and legal under the abnorms of sharia!

    As for “Innocence of Muslims” – everything the filmmaker made his buffoonish “Muhammad” say and do is also SUNNAH and HALAL – it’s all exactly what the most official moslem sources in the Qur’an and ahadith say he said and did LOL! It’s all completely ACCURATE!

    Please see:

    http:// dajjal DOT posterous DOT com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

    …for proof!

    And even it’s disjointed, overdubbing qualities echo the Qur’an, which is out of chronological order and prone to interjecting nonsensical exclamations and irrelevant digressions in the middle of any given topic or chapter!

    Besides, out of the tens of thousands of anti-islam vids up on YouTube, they pretend it was THIS ONE alone which “caused” mobs of moslem madmen to bring their rocket-launchers to riot and burn down American embassies worldwide on the anniversary of 911?! Please.

    The most basic question here is simply: “Does anyone have the right to violently physically attack anyone else for merely verbally “insulting” or “offending” them by disagreeing with them – Yes, or No?”!

    😉

  3. Posted on behalf of Vladdi:

    -Vladdi-
    …….

    These Saudomites are such hypocrites! I’m betting kiddie-porn is completely halal, sunnah and legal under the abnorms of sharia!

    As for “Innocence of Muslims” – everything the filmmaker made his buffoonish “Muhammad” say and do is also SUNNAH and HALAL – it’s all exactly what the most official moslem sources in the Qur’an and ahadith say he said and did LOL! It’s all completely ACCURATE!

    Please see:

    http:// dajjal DOT posterous DOT com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

    …for proof!

    And even it’s disjointed, overdubbing qualities echo the Qur’an, which is out of chronological order and prone to interjecting nonsensical exclamations and irrelevant digressions in the middle of any given topic or chapter!

    Besides, out of the tens of thousands of anti-islam vids up on YouTube, they pretend it was THIS ONE alone which “caused” mobs of moslem madmen to bring their rocket-launchers to riot and burn down American embassies worldwide on the anniversary of 911?! Please.

    The most basic question here is simply: “Does anyone have the right to violently physically attack anyone else for merely verbally “insulting” or “offending” them by disagreeing with them – Yes, or No?”!

    😉

Comments are closed.