UK: Telling the truth about Muslim gang rape is “playing into the hands of far right groups…”

And that would be worse than Mohammedan savages gang banging white girls?

From the taxpayer funded network of pedophiles, Islamophiles, perverts and leftist scum, the BBC, via Vlad

Kris Hopkins made his claims during a Commons debate

Tory MP Kris Hopkins has sparked a row in the Commons by claiming gangs of Muslim men are raping white “kids”.

The Keighley MP claimed police had felt they needed “permission” to go after abusers due to “political correctness”.

He said MPs should not avoid talking about the issue or the BNP and others will hijack it.

But Labour MP Yasmin Qureshi warned about “playing into the hands” of far right groups with such accusations.

Right. A token spokesturd for Paki Mustards with the Arab name of Qureshi, (meaning from the tribe of Muhammad) not only denies, minimises and obfuscates the motivations of the rapists, but she also adds insult to injury by suggesting that some imaginary ‘far right groups’ are somehow worse than the gangs of Mohammedan savages. Spit!

The Bolton South East MP said senior police officers and judges involved in cases of abuse had said race did not play a part.

‘Bigger picture’

She said the fact that the victims of abuse were white – in the cases Mr Hopkins was referring to – was “coincidental not deliberate”. (continued below the fold)

Update from Pamela Geller, with a whole list of Mohammedan transgressions which we’re not supposed to notice.

Once again the BBC and UK politicians refer to Muslims in racial terms which is just plain wrong. Islam is not a race. As for a politician finally bringing this up, it is long overdue. Scores and scores of Muslim men have been indicted and convicted of child rape and trafficking of non-Muslim girls in the UK. And these convictions are just the tip of the iceberg. And those convictions were also long overdue. The victims had been ignored by law enforcement for years, despite repeated calls for help. Law enforcement was more concerned with not appearing “racist.”

Check out the sick defense by Labour MP Yasmin Qureshi: “She warned against losing sight of the ‘bigger picture’” — that the common factors in all cases of abuse were the vulnerability of the victims and the fact that the perpetrators were “nearly all men.” Men as opposed to what? Roving gangs of militant lesbians? Space aliens?

Continued:

She warned against losing sight of the “bigger picture” – that the common factors in all cases of abuse was the vulnerability of the victims and the fact that the perpetrators were “nearly all men”.

“They (the victims) are always young girls, or young boys, or children and… the victims in these cases are always the vulnerable ones.

“It’s never the child who has got a secure happy family life,” she told MPs.

She was speaking in a Commons debate on the sexual exploitation of children.

Mr Hopkins insisted he had been right to raise the issue, telling MPs: “Time and time again it’s a white girl being raped by Muslim men and if we deny that fact in this House then the BNP and everybody else climbs on board.”

Gangs claim

He acknowledged that there were “long lists of notorious abusers” who were not Muslim but he added: “We shouldn’t get away from the fact that there are gangs of Muslim men going round and raping white kids”.

He said the previous MP in his constituency – Labour’s Ann Cryer – was right to raise similar concerns.

Last year, Ann Cryer said she had been made aware of a problem in her constituency in 2003 after she was approached by about six mothers who said their daughters were being groomed for sex by Pakistani men.

She said she tried to intercede with the community by asking a councillor to speak to Muslim elders, but they said it was not their affair

{ 5 comments }

Mullah Lodabullah November 14, 2012 at 7:16 am: Aren’t police officers sworn to uphold the law?

* being groomed for sex by Pakistani men

Practicing for employment at the BBC? :)
Georgina November 14, 2012 at 7:39 am: “victims of abuse were white … was “coincidental not deliberate”.

Actually, she is right. It is enough that they are non-muslim, and have their hair uncovered.
Only sex-slaves are allowed to show arms and legs and hair – ipso facto, if they are not muslims, they must be sex slaves.
Since they do the same things in predominantly non-white countries (India, Africa etc), skin colour is not relevant.

Of course, she is just strewing red herrings.
Hamid November 14, 2012 at 9:48 am: So if a bunch of white guys lost all sense and started to rape only muslim women (they’d probably insist they’d wear burkahs) – would it be just ‘coincidental’ then too?
Hill November 14, 2012 at 2:45 pm: Qureshi, suggested “that some imaginary ‘far right groups’ are somehow worse than the gangs of Mohammedan savages.”

-Hyperbole. I want her to provide one example? It should be easy if right groups are so bad.

“The Bolton South East MP said senior police officers and judges involved in cases of abuse had said race did not play a part.”

- So, who cares what the PC brigade said. What? is that supposed to end all criticism on the discussion then? Because someone in a position of authority said defined what it is.

She said the fact that the victims of abuse were white – in the cases Mr Hopkins was referring to – was “coincidental not deliberate”.

-Wrong again. Two or three is a coincidence. 10 or more is an organized conspiracy.
Uncle Vladdi November 14, 2012 at 10:03 pm: Typical moslem victim-blaming nonsense: “They (the victims) are always young girls, or young boys, or children and… the victims in these cases are always the vulnerable ones. “It’s never the child who has got a secure happy family life,” she told MPs.”

In other words: “If their parents hadn’t ignored them, and had in stead kept them locked up like good moslem families do, then their kids wouldn’t have been available in public to the pedophile gang-rapists wholly “natural” needs to rape and enslave them! See? It’s their infidel parents fault! Whee!”