It starts: Obama ‘urging’ Netanyahu not to allow ground invasion

by sheikyermami on November 18, 2012

Update:

Ban Ki-moonbat will visit Israel next week in an attempt to bring an end to Israel’s military operation in Gaza

Right. Because peace can only be achieved by protecting terrorists. (eyeonthe world has More…)

Global Jihad Against the Jews 

International law leaves no room to question Israel’s right to defend its citizens against systematic and sustained terrorist attacks launched from Gaza, by Hamas. Israel’s reaction to aggression is nothing more than a measured, fair response designed “to effectively terminate the attack [s]” upon it by terrorists supported by Iran, Syria, and Lebanon, in order to “prevent its recurrence.” Israel is far from using all means in fighting terrorism, as required by UNSC.

“Israel has right to defend itself but….”

The New York Times is reporting that President Obama is ‘urging’ Prime Minister Netanyahu not to invade Gaza.

Though  Obama uttered immediate and firm public and private assurances that Israel has a right to defend itself from rocket attacks emanating from Gaza, administration officials have been privately urging Israeli officials not to extend the conflict, a move that many American officials believe could benefit Hamas. (Carl in J’lem)

Alright, so Israel has a right to defend itself. But what about the duty to protect?

The New York Times Evades the Facts to Blame Israel

“With all its evasions about the situation and its unrealistic demands for restraint on Israel’s part, the editorial belied its statement that Israel has the right to defend itself. Indeed, it makes clear just one thing– that no matter what the reality isin the eyes of The New York Times editorial board, Israel will always be at fault.”

Israel and Syria exchange fire in Golan

Israel artillery has fired back at Syria after gunfire hit an Israeli military vehicle in the Golan Heights. The incident comes amid high tensions in the region as Israel is waging an offensive against Gaza while civil war continues in Syria. (Vlad)

Report: Hezbollah and Iran opened “missile bridge” to supply Hamas

Lebanon’s Al Akhbar, a site associated with Hezbollah, reports that Hezbollah is in contact with Hamas to replenish its arsenal of long-range rockets that has been reportedly decimated by Israeli airstrikes.

The US must communicate to Egypt immediately that if there is the slightest evidence that they are allowing weapons to be smuggled to Gaza that they will lose their $1.5 billion in aid. This is absolutely critical, and I hope that the White House makes this crystal clear.

ISRAELI TROOPS MASS ON GAZA BORDER

Egyptian terrorists joining in?

There are initial reports that mortars that hit near the Kerem Shalom crossing came from Egypt. In the hours before Operation Pillar of Defense, there were four rockets fired from the Sinai towards Israel.

Malaysia officially sides with Hamas (again)

Hardly a shock, but worth noting nonetheless. ‘Moderate modern’ Muslim Malaysia’s previous proclivities in regards to Hamas have been noted here at Jihad Watch before, so Malaysia’s (restated) condemnation of Israel’s self-defense and (restated) staunch support of Hamas was merely a matter of time. From “Malaysia condemns Israeli attacks on Gaza, calls for UN action,” The Star, 15 November 2012:

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia has urged the United Nations, particularly the Security Council, to take immediate resolute action over what it called irresponsible military action by Israel against innocent civilians in Gaza.

If you’re a moderate Muslim government like Malaysia, when is any Israeli military action not ‘irresponsible’?

Incredible: BBC tells Twitter to stop letting the IDF tweet 

Those paragons of moral virtue in London, the BBC, are simply beyond belief. They’re demanding that Hamas be kicked off Twitter. Okay. But to show how they’re ‘unbiased’ they’re demanding that the IDF be kicked off too (Hat Tip: Carl).

So, how did the BBC turn this unprovoked attack on Israel by terrorists and a corresponding announcement of defensive action into an exercise in blame-the-victims?

Here is the BBC’s Tweet.

.@Twitter bans “threats of violence”, but will it stop tweets by Hamas’s @AlqassamBrigade & Israel’s @IDFSpokesperson? http://bbc.in/Sso5cD

Note that BBC wants Twitter to stop the Tweets of bothHamas and the IDF as if they both share exactly the same guilt.

When they find a director general who’s not involved in covering up child molestation, please call me. The Beeb has very warped moral values. But then, you knew that.

Join the discussion...

Too small? Click here This is a satirical website. None of what you read here has anything to do with Islam, because Islam is a Religion of Peace. Everybody knows that good Muslims never do the things they do, (because Allah does it for them, Quran 8:12) and we know that only our misperceptions, ignorance and stereotyping of Islam makes Muslims chop off heads, kill and rape women and children, bomb subways, buses, nightclubs and fly jets into buildings. If it wasn't for the media and da Jooozzz, we wouldn't even know its happening. We welcome open, honest, thoughtful, and vigorous discussion in the comments threads, so do yourself a favour and don't accuse us of being 'haters' because we are loving, tolerant people. Don't curse us, don't threaten us with death or hellfire, and don't accuse us of being "just like the terrorists" because we don't do to Muslims what they do to us or to themselves. Yes, we know that only idiots oppose Islam and sensible people submit, but  you should know that we are ignorant bigots, hypocrites and Islamophobes, and we prefer to remain that way... But since you are forcing yourselves (and your abhorrent belief-system on us) we will defend ourselves, because we must. Avoid tu quoque and ad hominem attacks. Don't bother with circular reasoning either, we been there, done it.  If you annoy us, you will be banned and your posts summarily deleted. Try to add to the discussion, don't try to sell snake oil, don't try to cover us with Islamic shrouds of kitman and taqiyya, don't bother with da'awa, (we've heard it before) don't spam us with long pieces of cut & paste, write in English, try to tell the truth, (we know that's hard for you because you are all pathological liars) but the truth will set you free, try it! One more thing: don't think you can post here under multiple monikers. You will quickly be disappeared! The same goes for trufers and conspiracy kooks: you get one chance, one time. Blow it out of your ass if you must; put your stupidity on display. But you won't be back, trust me on that. Take a deep breath before you post, try to make some sense, do not just vent, do not make a fool of yourself and if you prove us wrong you can earn 10 Islamic dollars for your piggy bank. Deal?

{ 4 comments }

gramfan November 18, 2012 at 4:27 am

Add Bob Carr to the list.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/foreign-affairs/bob-carr-warns-israel-of-a-potential-world-backlash-over-its-bombing-of-gaza/story-fn59nm2j-1226519027302

Which idiot invented the phrase: “disproportionate response”?

R2P was tested in Libya. No invasion was needed then. Gaddafi was not really a threat the way Saddam Hussein was.

Back then, to me , it was obvious that it would be used on Israel.

Thank ‘our’ Gareth Evans, Samantha Powers (Mrs Cass Sunstein) and George Soros for that treaty. Oh ,,and add Hussein Obama to the R2P list as well as well.

gramfan November 18, 2012 at 4:27 am

Trying again,,post disappeared???

Add Bob Carr to the list.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/foreign-affairs/bob-carr-warns-israel-of-a-potential-world-backlash-over-its-bombing-of-gaza/story-fn59nm2j-1226519027302

Which idiot invented the phrase: “disproportionate response”?

R2P was tested in Libya. No invasion was needed then. Gaddafi was not really a threat the way Saddam Hussein was.

Back then, to me , it was obvious that it would be used on Israel.

Thank ‘our’ Gareth Evans, Samantha Powers (Mrs Cass Sunstein) and George Soros for that treaty. Oh ,,and add Hussein Obama to the R2P list as well as well.

Uncle Vladdi November 18, 2012 at 11:01 pm

The BBC has taken the evil victim-blaming immoral stance of nannystater kindergarten teachers everywhere to heart, that: “Attacking is always bad – even in self defense! We immoral relativists pretend to believe that: There can be no good without evil, no pleasure without pain, and no attacks without defenders!”

Their cowardly position is one of knee-jerk surrender to the moslems’ threats of violence: “We have to let the violent criminals do what they want to us, or else they’ll do what they want to us anyway!”

So, I have a few quick questions to the BBC (and enemedia in general) and for those pretending to be “our leaders” in government:

Q: Is it an absolute fact that there are absolutely no absolute facts? All facts are opinions?

Q: If you attack an innocent person, who has never harmed you or others, are you a criminal – or not?

YES – or NO?!

(AND – If you can find that someone else did so too, does that cancel your own criminality?)!

;-)

More specifically: Do you consider the following things (lying/fraud, extortion, torture, robbery, arson, kidnapping & ransoming, slavery, rape – including pedophilia – and murder) to be:

a) Holy religious rights and duties;
b) Crimes;

or

c) Not sure/unsilling to answer the question (?)

If you answered: (a) to the last question, you are a moslem; if: (b) you are sane – and probably a Conservative; and if: (c) you are a liberal apologist enabler for the crimes of others (and so, a criminal negligent yourself)!

;-)

Seamus November 19, 2012 at 8:30 pm

My biggest dream is for a Muslim to send Spookobama to Boogie Hell.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: