There is no cure for the Jew-hatred of useful idiots who defy reality to vilify the Jews. Leunig insults common sense and human dignity. In Leunig’s cartoons it is the Israelis who are the Nazis.
In Leunig’s world, anyone who supports the “Palestinians” will immediately be besieged by the all-powerful Jewish lobby, similarly jackbooted, treading on all who oppose them, closing doors in their faces, spiteful, hateful and bitter. In Leunig’s black-and-white world, Palestinian/Arab/Muslim lobby groups are muzzled and The Age would never dare to publish an article (or cartoon) critical of Israel.”
Perverse. The AGE hardly does anything but vilify Israel and suck up to the Arabs. Still waiting for any criticism of Mohammedanism from that quarter. Still waiting for the AGE to print a Muhammad cartoon…..
Comparing Nazis to Israelis is unacceptable
- BY: DVIR ABRAMOVICH / From: The Australian (thanks to Gramfan)
YESTERDAY in Melbourne’s The Age Michael Leunig defended his cartoon “First they came for the Palestinians”, previously published in that newspaper, and attacked those who supported Israel and who found his work objectionable.
Leunig’s cartoon takes the noble words of anti-Nazi cleric Martin Niemoller decrying the passivity of bystanders in the face of Nazi evil and substitutes the Nazis referred to in the original poem with Israelis: “First they came for the Palestinians and I did not speak out”.
Related:
Leunig obscenely equates the actions of Israel in Gaza to those of the Nazis and asserts the people who were once the objects of Hitler’s extermination and their descendants are now committing genocide against the Palestinians and are thus the present world’s Nazis.
I wonder if Leunig paused to consider how a survivor of the Holocaust would react when they came upon his cartoon?
Understandably shocked, they would ask, “How is it possible for anyone to compare the organised, industrial murder of six million Jews in gas chambers, in death camps, in ghettos and in open fields to what is happening in Gaza? Why would any person liken Israel’s protection of its citizens from rockets to the genocidal and bestial liquidation of the Jews?”
Equating Israeli policies to those of the Nazis has been identified as anti-Semitic by the EU, the US State Department, the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, since it calls for Israel’s destruction.
Yesterday, Leunig reiterated some of the themes of his cartoon.
Amazed anyone would think comparing Israeli policy to Nazi behaviour is anti-Semitic, Leunig calls Israel’s military policy “excessively homicidal” in yesterday’s piece .
Equally worrisome, Leunig implies Israel is already in the process of becoming Nazi-like, saying “all nations that throw their military weight around, occupying neighbouring lands and treating the residents with callous and humiliating disregard are already sliding towards the dark possibilities in human nature”.
Anyone with the vaguest knowledge of the Holocaust will know that by any measure comparing Israel to Nazi Germany is a kind of deliberate amnesia of the monstrous policies of the Nazis that minimises their genocidal extent and intent, and instead maligns Israel.
Consider how Leunig describes the way the Palestinians have been treated by “homicidal” Israel and see if you can hear the disturbing echoes Leunig is pushing, “The Palestinians have been massively robbed and abused, and are engaged in a desperate struggle for survival and liberation.”
I wonder, did Leunig’s “duty and conscience” compel him to sound the alarm all those years while thousands of rockets systematically fell on Israelis, attacks that Israeli author and peace activist Amos Oz called “a war crime and a crime against humanity”? Did Leunig ever express the “unspoken grief” of Israeli families who lost loved ones to terrorism?
Did he liken the actions of state genocides, brutal executions and large-scale massacres of civilians in Rwanda, Darfur, Congo, Nigeria, Syria, Myanmar, Somalia and Ethiopia to those of the Nazis? Did he call Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad “excessively homicidal” for wanting to wipe Israel off the map? Or is this epitaph reserved only for Israel?
Why does Leunig absolve Palestinians of all responsibility for their situation and ignore their behaviour against Israel?
Criticism of Israeli policies is entirely acceptable and Leunig is entitled to his views. But such cartoons not only poison public debate, they close it. After all, how do you discuss the conflict with someone who compares Israelis to Nazis?
In his opinion piece this week, Leunig labels his critics in the Jewish community as “aggressive Israel supporters”, “cynical”, “bullying”, “lazy”, “false accusers” and “boys who cry wolf” who are engrossed in “obsessive and vapid denunciation”. He accuses anyone who dares to see anti-Semitic tones in his cartoon as frauds who “are not really upset by any ‘anti-Semitism’ in my cartoons (there is none) but by the possible impact of a cartoon on the doubters”.
Can you imagine any other community described in such an offensive way in an Australian newspaper?
In his cartoon, Leunig also descends into parroting another anti-Jewish screed, that of the nefarious, all-powerful Jewish lobby that is lurking behind the scenes, ready to pounce and stifle critics of Israel.
He writes that he and many others are silent about the Palestinians because they would be subjected to “hateful mail, doors closing, hostility, fear and spiteful condemnation”.
This all-powerful cabal of elders did not prove omnipotent enough to prevent Leunig from publishing his cartoon and yesterday’s piece.
In Leunig’s world there is no lobby group or publicity machine for the Palestinians.
Conspiratorial stereotypes about a predatory Jewish lobby that intimidates Palestinian supporters into silence have no place in any newspaper.
The Anti-Defamation Commission, a human rights organisation, felt that it could not tolerate such inexcusable expression.
It asked The Age for an opportunity to provide a balancing response to Leunig’s cartoon after it was directly attacked in another opinion piece that saw nothing troubling about Leunig’s cartoon and instead accused the Jewish community of thoughtlessness and bitterness.
The ADC was told that The Age would not publish its objections because its claims about the cartoon were unreasonable.
So Leunig’s “First they came for the Palestinians” is OK while offering a counterpoint is unreasonable.
Leunig accuses the Jewish community of closing doors.
That is exactly what The Age did.
It’s a strange world.
Dvir Abramovich is chairman of the Anti-Defamation Commission.


Palestinian Media Watch translates a May 6th article from the official
From Ian: Honest Reporting: Maybe Israel Isn’t Behind the Middle East’
From Ian: Latma: Channel 10's amazing scoop [youtube http://www.y
From BBC: Egyptian police have sealed off the Rafah border crossing wi
From New York Daily News: Federal authorities Thursday scrambled to fi
According to a cable sent by the US embassy in Damascus in December 20
Mustafa Kazemi is an Afghan government official and war correspondent.
One of the reasons why Israel's conflict with the 'Palestini
Haaretz's Barak Ravid reports that US Secretary of State John FN
Shavua tov, a good week to everyone. Moshe Averick destroys Yesh Atid
US officials told the Wall Street Journal on Thursday to expect more I
A bipartisan group of Congressional Representatives has urged 'm
Charles Krauthammer destroys President Hussein Obama on his response t
Those poor starving Gazans are now able to get Kentucky Fried Chicken 
{ 10 comments }
First they came for the cartoonists but I didn’t speak out because I’d never drawn Mohammad…………
Yes indeed.
Isn’t it strange that we never see the likes of Leunig draw a Muhammad cartoon?
Substitute “Isrealis” for “Palestinians” and you will have something much closer to the truth, however non-PC it may be.
So if my next door neighbor continuously pounded on my door and threatened myself and my family, and occasionally actually fired shots through my front door, and I let it go until he actually kicked in my door and started shooting, at which point I shot back. He had his 2 young children standing with him, and in self-defense, I inadvertently shoot his 2 kids, along with him. This makes me the aggressor? The bad guy? Support Israel.
First, If anyone came for the Palestinians, the reality is, it was other Palestinians. Who would most likely order and act upon taking the life of said missing Palestinian.
Second, My question for Leunig is …
a.) How many Arabs live safely in Israel?
b.) How many Arab political parties are there in Israel?
c.) How many Arabs sit in the Knesset?
d.) How many Arabs are allowed to use and receive medical treatment in Israeli hospitals each year?
e.) How many Arabs are allowed to attend Israeli schools and universities?
Now…How many Israeli citizens are allowed into any of the a fore mentioned Arab counterparts?
I believe the answer is a big fat zero.
Let’s be honest, one could only wish the world was silent on the whole fake Palestinian issue. But, the leftist posers are loud and obnoxious and need something to rebel against to feed their egos and this is the current Cause Célèbre.
As the learned Jewish professor Norman Finkelstein put it, “If the zionists don’t like being compared with the Nazi’s then they should stop acting like them” I for one wholeheartedly agree with the learned professor on that account.
And so long as the discussion is about Israel’s thuggish behaviours, lets not forget that Israel’s violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the neighboring states to warehouse its unwanted minority population and the use of its laws, snipers, and minefields to keep those particular Palestinian refugees excluded from their country of origin is a graphic example of Grand Apartheid.
You dropped a turd, and then you stepped right into it:
PLO Leader: “THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE DOES NOT EXIST”
March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper “Trouw” published an interview with Palestine Liberation Organization executive committee member Zahir Muhsein:
“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.”
Disgusted doesn’t know any history, only revisionist rubbish.
Tell me – when did the Israelis commit industrial murder on 6 million Fakestinians?
Actually the population of Fakestinians has grown! Doesn’t sound like Auschwitz to me!
Oh and in case you don’t know Israel does not occupy Gaza. They gave it back. Egypt didn’t want it back after the wars. and the West Bank is actually Jordan – don’t believe me? Ask Walid Shoebat.
Also most Arab countries treat Fakestinians like dirt. Why do you think that is?
Pick on them for a while.
@gramfan
Well said.
@disgusted,
Gives us actual examples of a like for like comparison that the Israeli’s have actually acted like the Nazi’s. Not hyperbole.
If the Fakastani’s were being exterminated en masse their population and birth rate numbers would not be going up.
Where is the evidence of mass extermination?
It can’t be both extermination and growth. Not possible.
Comments on this entry are closed.