“Silent Christian Majority” objects to anti-Israel church activity, issues declaration

“The hostility to Israel is part of a larger pattern.”

“The forces that refuse to tolerate the existence of a Jewish state are fiercely intolerant of other religious and ethnic minorities in the Middle East.”

Nice to see that some Christians have not lost their marbles and see through the Mohammedan spin.

Considering the frequent vitriolic attacks against the Jewish state by mainstream Protestant churches, the publication of the Jerusalem Declaration earlier this month by the Protestant Consultation on Israel and the Middle East (PCIME) was well appreciated here. (Jewish Tribune)

In other news:

‘First  Damascus, then Tel Aviv'”

Jordanian Muslim leader to Netanyahu: “Get ready. The army of the Prophet Mohammad is coming your way.”

Once the jihad in Syria has toppled Assad, he says, they will conquer Israel. Not that that purely nationalist struggle against a vicious dictator has anything to do with Islam. “‘First we take Damascus, then Tel Aviv,'” by Roi Kais for Ynet News, December 16 (thanks to JW)

Continue reading

Blasphemy and Islam

“What is the point of a federal government that cannot tell America’s enemies from America?

Blasphemy and Islam

In Cairo on Wednesday, a Coptic Christian blogger named Alber Saber was convicted of blasphemy and “contempt of religion.” There’s a tragic irony: As any of the country’s Christians can tell you, contempt of religion is not merely permitted but encouraged in the new, post-Mubarak Egypt. What is criminal, what has become increasingly perilous, is any criticism of Islam.

Nor is truth a defense. Another Egyptian court recently upheld the blasphemy conviction of Makarem Diab, also a Coptic Christian. Diab had gotten into a discussion with a Muslim acquaintance, Abd al-Hameed, who, in the course of mocking Diab’s faith, insisted that Jesus was a serial fornicator. Diab countered Hameed’s baseless taunt with an assertion most Islamic scholars regard as accurate: namely, that Mohammed had more than four wives. Yet, because the context of Diab’s assertion evinced an intention to cast Islam’s prophet in an unfavorable light, Diab was prosecuted for “insulting the prophet” and “provoking students.” He was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment.

The Road to Damascus  (Daniel Greenfield)

“The difference between the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda is that the Muslim Brotherhood wins an election before shooting people in the streets while Al Qaeda shoots people in the street without waiting for an election.”–(TROP)

Continue reading

Innocence of the Prophet

Full movie, innocence of the prophet, now online.

Movie: The Innocent Prophet  (Imran Firasat)

(Video) This is the video made by an ex-Muslim from Pakistan, who is being threatened with expulsion from Spain because of it. (TROP)

Watch it here, thanks to Vlad Tepes:

From the Gates of Vienna:

Imran Firasat is a Pakistani ex-Muslim and proprietor of www.mundosinislam.com who now lives in Spain. He collaborated with pastor Terry Jones on the movie The Innocent Prophet, which was released this morning.

After being pressured by the Spanish government and threatened with deportation to Pakistan, Mr. Firasat disassociated himself from the release of the movie. Below is an interview with him that was shown on Thursday on Spanish television.

Interview with Imran Firasat, maker of the innocence of the Prophet: Spanish TV Dec 13 2012

Isn’t it strange that the interviewer assumes that criticizing Islam is an offense to great that the US would seek extradition for it? Despite their first amendment?

Needless to mention that this film was made outside the USA:

Obama’s Sharia Democracy

Virtually Absent From U.S. Press Coverage of Egypt’s Constitution and Referendum: It’s About Sharia Law

And yes: they did vote for sharia:  Egyptians narrowly approve Sharia constitution

Nice misdirection there. As Andrew McCarthy, “arguably the most important prosecutor in the War on Terror” and “among the most authoritative writers anywhere on the dangers of Jihad,” explained at PJ Media on Wednesday morning, and as much of the non-U.S. press accurately comprehends, the proposed constitution is about institutionalizing sharia in Egypt, and the last-minute splitting of the vote, originally scheduled for only today but now taking place today and next Saturday, is about ensuring its victory at the polls. –Read more>>

There are no accidents.

“Susan Rice didn’t really lie, Republicans only seemed to believe she misled the nation”

Rice lied on five Sunday shows in stark contrast with reality that there was no premeditated terrorist attack on the consulate in Benghazi.–Read more>>

But the leftarded establishment knows its all about race. “Give liars a chance”- demands CNN’s lefty limey Piers Morgan.

“If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon.”

The term “white skin privilege” was first popularized in the 1970s by the SDS radicals of “Weatherman,” who were carrying on a terrorist war against “Amerikkka,” a spelling designed to stigmatize the United States as a nation of Klansmen.

“Nice guy” stands for love and hating America:

We need to spend more money on educating our children so that they don’t turn into High School principals. Meet Amod Field:

Egyptians narrowly approve Sharia constitution

Pamela Geller:

I have as much faith in the integrity of the Egyptian election of a sharia constitution as I do in the integrity of the re-election of Obama. Official results are not expected till after the next round, but I expect that that, too, will get the desired Muslim Brotherhood result. They wouldn’t have it any other way.

There will be another round of voting, and so the story isn’t quite over yet, and “narrowly” doesn’t matter once the dust has settled, but it’s noteworthy that even with all the voter intimidation, guilt manipulation and commands to vote yes from the imams, and threats and violence, the Islamic supremacists could only get 56.5% of the vote. Clearly a huge number of Egyptians, and possibly a majority, don’t want a Sharia state.

“Egyptians narrowly back Islamist-shaped constitution, say rival camps,” by Marwa Awad and Yasmine Saleh for Reuters, December 16 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Continue reading

Hosting Qatada

Update:

Abu Qatada runs up £500,000 legal aid bill to stay in UK

Human Rights laws are a bonanza for shysters; they win every way it turns.

***BESTPIX*** Muslim Cleric Abu Qatada Is Released From Prison

Abu Qatada arrives at his home in north-west London last month after he was released from prison. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Abu Qatada, the cleric once described as Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe, has received more than £500,000 in legal aid, a figure expected to rise as he continues to resist government efforts to deport him.

The figure, believed to be one of the largest awarded to an individual, will infuriate the home secretary, Theresa May, who has been leading attempts to remove a man she describes as “a serious risk to our national security”.

Qatada, a POS straight out of the sewers of Mohammedanistan, is keeping the Brits on their toes:

Abu Qatada’s £28k-a-year home 

The £400,000 five-bed house has three ­bathrooms, a reception and a study .

Hate preacher Abu ­Qatada’s new home costs the public £28,800 a year in rent – thousands more than the Government’s proposed benefit cap.

The £400,000 five-bed house has three ­bathrooms, a reception and a study and costs £2,800 more than the suggested £26,000 limit for one family.

On top of rent, Qatada, 51, who was freed from jail on Monday, is set to get almost £8,000 a year in benefits for a bad back.

The radical Muslim’s wife has also been claiming income support and child benefit for the couple’s five children.

If they remain in London, the Qatadas will be among an estimated 3,300 families in their area who will be forced to move under the welfare reforms.

The cleric’s mum Aisha Othman, 70, said after his release: “He was elated to be with his family.”

Continue reading

U.S. Hizbo’s ridicule ‘my jihad’ campaign, in Oz they deny that jihad means… jihad!

Looks like Ahmed Rehab has a hard time convincing his coreligionists that jihad means ‘taking your kids to school’ or paying taxes.

#MyJihad campaign ain’t jihad, says Hizb ut Tahrir: “If this is Jihad – what Jihad were the Muslims doing under Rasul’Allah [Muhammad]“?

Hizb ut Tahrir is an organization of Islamic supremacists around the world, dedicated to imposing Sharia. Apparently they didn’t get the memo about how the witless unbelievers need to be deceived about the nature and meaning of jihad, and so they’re taking issue with Ahmed Rehab and his cosmetics. Blazing Cat Fur has the link to the HuT forum:  (this is interesting, read it all)

Meanwhile, our creative friends from the counterjihad have worked hard to correct Ahmed’s disinformation campaign:

Blazing Cat Fur has a few more; click here!

Meanwhile, Downunder:

Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir lashes think tank study

CONTROVERSIAL  (what’s not “controversial” for the lame stream media these days?) Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir has hit back at claims it may pose a security threat.

Adelaide Now via Mullah

“Tiny minority of excremists” in Indonesia

Perth-based think tank Future Directions International (FDI) says while Hizb ut-Tahrir does not advocate violence, its anti-Western rhetoric could pose a “socio-cultural” security threat by increasing the disharmony between Muslim and non-Muslim Australians.

In the long term, the group may pose a significant national security threat by indirectly instigating terrorist attacks, FDI warned in a study last week.

Continue reading

The Only Way to Stop a Gun is With a Gun

Update:

“The Sandy Hook school was a gun-free zone,”

… and ‘gun free zones’ are DEFENCE-FREE ZONES

It’s not about ending crime, or stopping violence. It’s about control. Controlling unarmed citizens is easier than controlling someone who can fight back.

Sure, many lefties really do believe that gun control laws will help. They also believe that a bigger government with the power to order its citizens around somehow means that those citizens have more freedoms than under a small government that has little power over the people.

That’s why they’re called useful idiots. They lack the ability to think things through logically.

“After a shooting spree,” author William Burroughs once said, “they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn’t do it.” Burroughs continued: “I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military.”

Pamela Geller:

Guns stop shootings. Not all the time and not every time, but they do. Gun control does not. Media coverage calling for gun control does not.  Gun crime was up 35 percent in the UK which has harsh gun control laws. And Europe has had plenty of its own school massacres.

The Aussie Lesson: Less Guns, More Crime

We would be wise to see the timelessness of George Washington’s often quoted phrase, a “free people ought…to be armed.” In so doing we grasp the larger lesson that the ability to defend ourselves is part and parcel to our freedom.

The second we are unarmed we are likewise no longer free.

THE ONLY WAY TO STOP A MAN WITH A GUN IS WITH A GUN

Daniel Greenfield:

America now has its second worst mass shooting. And it, as usual, accompanied by calls for gun control. It’s no coincidence that we have had quite a few spree killings in such a short time. The lavish coverage of every shooting by the media encourages every shooter to think that he will be famous if he goes out and kills. And that is exactly what happens.

Our shooters are creatures of the media, not the NRA. A media that turns killers into celebrities and then warns that the only way to stop more shootings is by cracking down on firearms.

Continue reading

Egypt: Who Counts Wins

Barry Rubin explains:

Why Islamists MuBro’s Always Win “Fair” Elections

(M)oderates are not united or disciplined. They are also  more poorly funded and more naïve about how to operate politically than the Islamists. The Islamists, or at least some of them (and that’s all that’s necessary) are prepared to use intimidation and violence; the moderates not. And that’s all in addition to having the advantage of appealing to a very powerful, deep-seated religious belief held by the majority

A supporter of Egypt’s President Mohamed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood holds a copy of the Koran, Islam’s holy book, as he shouts slogans during a demonstration in Cairo’s Nasr City on December 14, 2012. (thanks to Pamela)

Egypt: Islamic supremacists attack opposition party paper with Molotov cocktails; sheikhs tell Muslims to vote in favor of Sharia constitution

Related:

Opposition claims fraud in Egypt vote

Egyptians vote for Sharia — or else. “Violence flares in Cairo as Egyptians vote,” by Tamim Elyan and Yasmine Saleh for Reuters, December 15 via JW.

CAIRO (AFP) – Counting was under way early Sunday after a first-round referendum on a divisive new constitution pushed through by President Mohamed Morsi and his Islamist allies despite weeks of opposition protests.

Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood and main media outlets said that, based on very early unofficial figures, it appeared that the polling was trending towards 70 percent support for the draft charter.

But the opposition disputed that, saying its preliminary figures suggested that 66 percent of the voters had rejected the proposed constitution. It claimed the Muslim Brotherhood had sought to “rig” the vote.