74% of French say Islam is ‘intolerant’

At which point they should not be debating, but actually do something. For starters, one could question whether a genocidal, totalitarian ideology should be allowed to continue operating in the guise of ‘religion’ at all. Quite encouraging when you consider how much dhimmitude is already enforced from the elitists in government. And yesterdays Curry Princess blog post also gives reason to believe that not all is lost, even in the UK.

Thanks to the Religion of Peace:

Islam: 74% of French say it’s an ‘intolerant’ religion

(ANSAmed) – ROME, JANUARY 24 – A new survey by Paris-based Ipsos research company on Thursday showed 74% of French respondents believe the Muslim religion is ”intolerant” and incompatible with their social values.

The survey, published on the Le Monde newspaper website, also showed eight out of 10 French people believe the Islamic religion tries to impose its views on others, 10% believe a majority of Muslims are fundamentalists, and another 44% believe a many but not all Muslims are fundamentalists. Most respondents did not know how to define fundamentalism, however.

The data varied across age groups and political affiliations, but represents a majority in each category of respondents

In other news:

Rightfully stolen Mosque

Vlad  quotes one of the great lines from The Princess Bride:

“You have taken from me, that which I have rightfully stolen!”

Turks irked, accuse Lego of racism for model resembling mosque



Racism? What race are Muslims again? I keep forgetting. And as for the Hagia Sophia, the Turks in Austria for some reason neglected to mention exactly how it became a mosque. On May 29, 1453, Islamic jihadists broke the siege of Constantinople and entered the city. Historian Steven Runciman notes that the Muslim soldiers “slew everyone that they met in the streets, men, women, and children without discrimination. The blood ran in rivers down the steep streets from the heights of Petra toward the Golden Horn. But soon the lust for slaughter was assuaged. The soldiers realized that captives and precious objects would bring them greater profit.” (The Fall of Constantinople 1453, Cambridge University Press, 1965, p. 145.)

Some jihadists “made for the small but splendid churches by the walls, Saint George by the Charisian Gate, Saint John in Petra, and the lovely church of the monastery of the Holy Saviour in Chora, to strip them of their stores of plate and their vestments and everything else that could be torn from them. In the Chora they left the mosaics and frescoes, but they destroyed the icon of the Mother of God, the Hodigitria, the holiest picture in all Byzantium, painted, so men said, by Saint Luke himself. It had been taken there from its own church beside the Palace at the beginning of the siege, that its beneficient presence might be at hand to inspire the defenders on the walls. It was taken from its setting and hacked into four pieces.” (P. 146.)

The jihadists also entered the Hagia Sophia, which for nearly a thousand years had been the grandest church in Christendom. The faithful had gathered within its hallowed walls to pray during the city’s last agony. The Muslims, according to Runciman, halted the celebration of Orthros (morning prayer); the priests, according to legend, took the sacred vessels and disappeared into the cathedral’s eastern wall, through which they shall return to complete the divine service one day. Muslim men then killed the elderly and weak and led the rest off into slavery. Then the Sultan Mehmet the Conqueror had a muezzin mount the pulpit and proclaim that there was no god but Allah and Muhammad was his prophet. The great church was transformed into a mosque, its gorgeous icons destroyed or covered with huge medallions bearing Islamic declarations of faith.

Once the Muslims had thoroughly subdued the entire city of Constantinople, they set out to Islamize it. According to the Muslim chronicler Hoca Sa’deddin, tutor of the sixteenth-century Sultans Murad III and Mehmet III, “churches which were within the city were emptied of their vile idols and cleansed from the filthy and idolatrous impurities and by the defacement of their images and the erection of Islamic prayer niches and pulpits many monasteries and chapels became the envy of the gardens of Paradise.”

Now the sons and heirs of these bloody conquerors complain because they think a Lego set stereotypes them.

“Lego accused of racism with Star Wars set,” by Matthew Day for the Telegraph, January 23 (thanks to JW):

Lego has been accused of racism by the Turkish community over a Star Wars model that supposedly resembles one of Istanbul’s most revered mosques.

Continue reading Rightfully stolen Mosque

Australia Day

It’s never Australia Day without someone filling Fairfax column inches with bitching about our shameful past or complaints we’re not a republic.

Yesterday The Age gave us the first. Today the second:

You know it’s Australia Day when…

In other news:

The police keeps digging:

Police step up investigation into Gillard’s AWU scandal

VICTORIAN detectives have expanded their investigation into the purchase of a Fitzroy house with union slush fund money controlled by the disgraced former boyfriend of Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

Bizarre leftist brain farts:

If it weren’t for good luck, Abbott would have no luck at all, writes Michelle Grattan.

Oh yes she did: Shrillary blamed free speech for Benghazi Gate

Hillary Clinton denies blaming free speech for Benghazi jihad massacre: “I did not say… that it was about the video for Libya”

“Hillary Clinton: ‘I Did Not Say That It Was About the Video for Libya,’” from Fox News, January 23 (thanks to JW):

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified at the House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, answering questions on the attack in Benghazi, Libya.Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) pressed her on the anti-Islamic video that was originally blamed for the attack. “When you briefed us, you said unequivocally this was a result of a video and I remember in fact you got pretty upset about it when somebody suggested this was a terrorist attack.”

Clinton said, “I did not say … that it was about the video for Libya, it certainly was for many of the other places where we were watching these disturbances.”

Oh yes she did:

America, Obama is in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood.

A retired four-star Admiral says this is exactly what happened:

The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “the attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi…was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…the first stage of an international prisoner exchange…that would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…

And lo and behold, among the dead bodies, among the militants reportedly heading the mission are several blond-haired, blue-eyed westerners.

Obama is in bed with terrorists. Obama is in bed with the enemy.

Britons in Benghazi warned to get out immediately after Foreign Office reports ‘imminent threat’

  • Foreign Office says westerners may be targeted in strife-hit Libyan city
  • U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed there in September
  • Violent groups currently vie for power in aftermath of Gaddafi’s death


Curry princess Warsi: fewer than one in four people believe Islam is compatible with British way of life

Shock horror! All the government imposed indoctrination programs and hate speech laws for naught! And still the filthy kafirs won’t submit and start liking their executioners!

What’s the world coming to:

 “we must rise to the challenge and stamp out this new and rising form of prejudice.”–(thanks to Mullah)

Fewer than one in four people now believe that following Islam is compatible with a British way of life, Britain’s most senior Muslim minister will warn today.

Highlighting unpublished research showing that a majority of the country now believes that Islam is a threat to Western civilisation Baroness Sayeeda Warsi will say that “underlying, unfounded mistrust” of Muslims is in itself fuelling extremism.

Underlying, unfounded mistrust, like this?

Continue reading Curry princess Warsi: fewer than one in four people believe Islam is compatible with British way of life

Shrillary: “We now face a spreading jihadist threat, we have to recognize this is a global movement”

She said it.  even ‘progressives’ feel it when ‘man caused disasters’ bite them in the ass.

“We now face a spreading jihadist threat, we have to recognize this is a global movement.”

Hillary Lets the Jihadist Cat Out of Bag

Posted By Robert Spencer  In Daily Mailer,FrontPage

After four years of pretending there is no jihad against the free world, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton blurted out the truth during her testimony on the Benghazi jihad massacre Wednesday: “We now face a spreading jihadist threat,” she said, adding: “We have to recognize this is a global movement.”

We do? Yet the Obama administration has for years steadfastly and repeatedly denied both that there was a jihadist threat at all and that it was a global movement. So far has the Obama administration been from acknowledging that there was a jihad threat that less than two months into Obama’s first term, on March 16, 2009, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano noted proudly that in her first testimony to Congress, “I did not use the word ‘terrorism,’ I referred to ‘man-caused’ disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur.” (continued below the fold)

Not to worry, we ’re in the best of hands:

During the Benghazi hearings this afternoon with a House committee Hillary Clinton told told the audience that Al-Qaeda has no interest in attacking our homeland.

“I think we have to take seriously all of these terrorist groups, whatever they call themselves. Now, at the moment, they don’t necessarily have either the interest or ability to attack our homeland.”  (GWP)

She lies and lies:

Hillary Clinton denies blaming free speech for Benghazi jihad massacre: “I did not say… that it was about the video for Libya”

No end to the dissembling. “Hillary Clinton: ‘I Did Not Say That It Was About the Video for Libya,’” from Fox News, January 23

Continue reading Shrillary: “We now face a spreading jihadist threat, we have to recognize this is a global movement”

Muslim Brotherhood Group to ‘Connect All U.S. Schools’

 Barry Soetoro aka Barrack Hussein Obama takes the Islamisation of America seriously. What could go wrong? WND EXCLUSIVE

Partners with State, Education departments on international initiative

JERUSALEM – A Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization has partnered with the U.S. Department of Education and the State Department to facilitate an online program aiming to connect all U.S. schools with classrooms abroad by 2016.

Vartan Gregorian, a board member of the organization, the Qatar Foundation International, was appointed in 2009 to President Obama’s White House Fellowships Commission.

WND previously exposed that Gregorian served as a point man in granting $49.2 million in startup capital to an education-reform project founded by former Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers and chaired by Obama.

Documentation shows Gregorian was central in Ayers’ recruitment of Obama to serve as the first chairman of the project, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge – a job in which Obama worked closely on a regular basis with Ayers.

Obama also later said his job at the project qualified him to run for public office, as WND previously reported.

Connecting schools to fulfill Obama pledge

Continue reading Muslim Brotherhood Group to ‘Connect All U.S. Schools’

Do jerks deserve free speech?

Not according to Alecia Simmonds who calls herself a ‘writer’ for the Fairfax media. She uses her free speech for a vile attack on Andrew Bolt, whom she calls ‘a jerk’.

Alecia wants you to    “Imagine if Alan Jones and  Andrew Bolt could be thrown in prison and charged money for vomiting venomous racist bile in public.”

Well, we still have freedom of speech and that’s why Andrew Bolt and Alan Jones can still speak and be heard. Imagine for one moment that all we had left were  Fairfax scribblers like Alecia Simmonds who would serve you  yesterdays Gillard lines regurgitated. I shudder.

Dangerous Lunatics:

Andrew Bolt: How many “racists” does O’Farrell want jailed?

SURE, NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell isn’t the only one now crazy-keen to sic the cops on to people with bad opinions.

Yesterday, a Sydney Morning Herald commentator wrote it was “high time that (broadcaster Alan) Jones and Bolt were sent to the clanger, but for their misogyny as much as their racism”.


Would Alecia Simmonds also call her PM a jerk?

THE Prime Minister couldn’t have been clearer about her racism when she dumped a Labor Senator this week for being white.

“There has never been an indigenous Australian who has served as a federal Labor representative,” Julia Gillard said on Tuesday.

From ‘not optimal’ to ‘what difference does it make….’

For a Jailed Filmmaker, Clinton’s Benghazi Lies Make a Difference

If she doesn’t care who does?  Well, lets ask the Moonbat messiah. What did he say?

‘If four Americans get killed, it’s not OPTIMAL’: yep, that was Obama’s extraordinary response.

Indeed,  the deaths of four Americans in a terrorist attack was “not optimal”,  but Dear Leader saw that as nothing more than a “bump in the road” under his re-election campaign bus.

Posted By Daniel Greenfield In Daily Mailer,FrontPage

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrived back in the Senate, after dodging a few falling safes, multiple banana peels and an ornery dog named Henry, to give a carefully prepared histrionic rant which can be summed up, “I do care a lot” and “None of this was my fault” and “What difference at this point does it make?”

The last isn’t a sarcastic restatement. It’s what she actually said.

It might make a difference to a Coptic Christian whose trailer for a bad movie was blamed by the leader of the free world for a series of Al Qaeda attacks against American diplomatic facilities and who was sent to prison on the orders of members of the administration.

Continue reading From ‘not optimal’ to ‘what difference does it make….’