Pelousi coins new term for gun control:
Gun grabbing moonbats will continue to annoy everyone unless we put them out of business.
Who Â wants a limp dick like Piers Morganputz as a tyrant?
California assembly member Nancy Skinner proposed the bill to restrict ammunition sales in the state.
NBC Bay AreaÂ reported:
“Gun violence will continue unless we control the sale of bullets.”
Chicago has been a shining city on a hill for gun-grabbers for decades. In fact, so extreme is the gun control in the Windy City that prior to the 2010 Supreme Court decision inÂ McDonald v. Chicago, you couldn’t even have a gun in your own house with which to defend yourself or your family.
In other words, a Chicago home owner was like a public school teacher — he had to sit defenseless with his fingers crossed and simply hope the criminals didn’t target his house on a given day or night.
Even now, after theÂ McDonaldÂ decision, you have jumpÂ through myriad hoopsÂ to get a gun. And, although they are working on it, concealed carry has yet to be legalized.
So in a gun-control-utopia such as this, you’d expect school-age children to be safe from all harm, if you buy into the theories of Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
Yet the truth is more than 440 school-age childrenÂ have been shot in Chicago in 2012. This is not to say that 440 school-age children died, simply that more than 440 school-age children were at least wounded. The number of school-age children killed is reported at approximately 60.
These numbers are well above those for theÂ 2011-2012 school year,Â Â in which 319 Chicago students were wounded and another 24 were killed.
The bottom line: It seems that denying the free exercise of the right to keep and bear arms to law-abiding citizens not only does not curtail the actions of criminals, but actually emboldens them.