Craven Dhimmitude & Preemptive Capitulation

Daily Mail wimps out, pixelates Charlie Hebdo cartoon of Muhammad

That’s what it means when the Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] talks about “destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…”

Western cowardice and preemptive capitulation is all that’s needed to ensure the triumph of Islam.

The Daily Mail’s photo

This is the suicide of the free press. The Daily Mail is generally better than the other papers in Britain in covering the jihad threat, but it is also careless, sensationalistic, and — as this proves — execrably cowardly. The Daily Mail is hereby signaling that violent intimidation works, and that all you have to do to get the West’s vaunted “free press” to cower before you and give up its freedom is lob a few bombs, kill a few innocents, make a few threats.

OIC top dog fulminates against new Muhammad cartoons as “abuse of freedom of expression”

“Ihsanoglu urged all Muslims to exercise restraint in the face of this incitement. He reiterated the OIC’s principled position on developing an international consensus on dealing with a frequency of deliberate acts of incitement, within the framework of the Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18.” In other words, don’t riot and kill this time, since soon we will prevail upon dhimmi Western governments to outlaw criticism of Islam. And the dhimmi press is already falling into line.

“OIC slams French caricature of Prophet,” from Arab News, January 3 (thanks to JW):

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has slammed caricatures of the Prophet (peace be upon him), published in the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, saying it incites hatred and intolerance against Muslims.


Interview with  Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu. This one should be watched by everyone involved in the counter jihad. Thanks to Vlad Tepes for keeping these videos coming.  Full transcript here.

To understand the importance of this, watching Stephen Coughlin’s brief on the OIC is very useful.

More here at GoV

OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu expressed concern at the publication of the comic book series on the life of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

Ihsanoglu said the publication went against the norms of responsible journalism and was tantamount to abuse of the right to freedom of expression. He added that incitement and advocacy of hatred and intolerance on religious grounds signified by this publication was in contravention of international human rights laws and instruments.

He called on the magazine to abide by the provisions, particularly those in the European Union (EU) context, on incitement to hatred and violence. He urged the authorities in France to take appropriate action against the magazine.

Ihsanoglu urged all Muslims to exercise restraint in the face of this incitement. He reiterated the OIC’s principled position on developing an international consensus on dealing with a frequency of deliberate acts of incitement, within the framework of the Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18.

Bat Ye’or explains how it all went so quickly downhill:

Bat Ye’or is not optimistic about the future of Europe and especially not an Obama-led United States. She shares her concerns with her readers In her conclusion:

While writing this study I was reminded of a question that greatly troubled me twenty-five years ago when researching Les Chrétientés d’Orient entre jihad et dhimmitude (1991). How did Christian peoples and states, some with powerful armies and the richest cultures of their times, collapse when faced with the onslaught of jihad and dhimmitude from the seventh to the fifteenth centuries? Now I no longer ask myself this question. The breakdown process that I used to study and documented in old chronicles I have seen taking place in today’s Europe. When I examined the past I saw it repeated in the present, under my very eyes. Indeed, the present situation is reminiscent of the one that followed the Muslim conquests. Keeping Christian officials in their positions maintained a semblance of continuity. Behind their foggy screen, Islamization could penetrate within every stratum of the vanquished societies. However, with time, the collapse of this edifice revealed the true role of these ministers, whose job was to enforce upon their people the caliphate’s orders, under pain of death. I was missing one essential link in the chain of events: the motivations of human beings that lead them in an unswerving direction within the chaos of events, the undeviating route toward an ultimate objective. Now this link is revealed in the mix of fears, cowardice, corruption, hatred and short-term ambitions that within the space of forty years have led Europe along the road to Eurabia, an interim stage in an even more profound change.

5 thoughts on “Craven Dhimmitude & Preemptive Capitulation”

  1. Well the PORTE PAROLE of the French Government, the morrocon arab, Najat Belkacem, a minister in a Republique that prides itself as SECULAR (“laique”), criticised Charlie Hebdo as “putting oil on the fire” ..and “lacking responsibility”…blablabla-Allah-akbar-blablabla. She actually added that she had not read the offending issue.

    Here are a couple of short translations from this article:

    “En critiquant Charlie Hebdo, Najat Belkacem se comporte en taupe de l’islam”
    Criticising Charlie Hebdo, Najat Belkacem acts as a mole for Islam.

    Concluding, Paul Lepoulpe writes:
    “…Bref, nous avons un gouvernement d’islamo-collabos et Najat Belkacem, même si c’est une incapable qui ne doit sa place qu’à ses origines, est parfaite pour y être une porte-parole qui bafoue la laïcité en se couchant devant les barbus.”

    …In short, we have a Government made up of islamic collaborators and Najat Belkacem, even if she is incapable/useless who owes her place (as Minister and Porte Parole of the Government) only to her origins, is perfect as porte-parole who besmirches the secularity of the Republique by prostrating herself at the feet of the bearded ones.

    What can you expect from a Government whose President of a SECULAR Republic with strict separation of State and Church, sends his best wishes to the islamists for their “religious” celebrations of their l’Aid el Fitr , yet does not even acknowledge Christmas to his French citizens.

    I feel sick!

    1. Socialism is a mental disorder.These cretins will not be able to ride the Islamic tiger, but they will join them to destroy Europe beyond anyones imaginations:

  2. Why is there, in your picture, no Hakenkreuz (Swastika) ???Hmmmmmmm????? The “great” Mufti of Jerusalem will turn in his grave !

  3. I wouldn’t be surprised if the star somehow morphs into the swastika. But in the end, the commies are ignorant, primitive and will inevitably succumb to what OBL called the “strong horse”.

    Here some very accurate observations from the Baron at GoV:

    Dr. Ä°hsanoÄŸlu also confirms what I have long contended in this space: the OIC and the Muslim Brotherhood object to violent terrorist factions within Islam not because the objectives of those groups are wrong, but because they are counter-productive. Islamic violence against infidels tends to waken the kuffar from their slumber and arouse their resistance. Therefore, with an eye on the long-term goal, it is to be avoided.

    The OIC believes it can accomplish the same end — the establishment of the World Caliphate — without detonating any bombs or slitting even a single infidel throat.

  4. Liberals are disgusting, reactionary, cowardly traitors:

    “We have to let the violent criminals do what they want to us, or else they’ll do what they want to us anyway!

    Liberals (and all governments are statist gangsters) like moslems, believe in “everything goes” fatalism; i.e: “Since every given crime’s going to happen anyway, we can’t deny it, so the best we can do, since have to allow it, is to accept, Submit to it, compromise with it and accommodate it! Whee!”


Comments are closed.