The Leftist-Islamic convergence moves to destroy the congresswoman just as corroboration comes of her truth-telling about Islamists in U.S. Government.
A petition bearing 178,000 signatures? Nothing easier than that. The Muslim Brotherhood and Â the boys from CAIR can get that many signatures Â from a multitude of Muslim organisations who can rely on more than 2000 mosques and madrases.
Robert Spencer: Vindicated Bachmann Under Attack
InÂ FrontPageÂ this morning I explain why People for the American Way’s attack on Michele Bachmann is so ironic coming now:
The Leftist advocacy group People for the American Way (PFAW) hasÂ launched an all-out warÂ against Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN). On Monday it plans to present House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) with a petition bearing 178,000 signatures, demanding that Bachmann not be reappointed to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
Needless to mention thatÂ People for the American Way (PFAW) is Â yet another bunch of Soros financed Â communist agit-props, Â out to destroy any opposition to the coming socialist utopia. Â One of their targets is Â Glenn Beck whom they accuse to be Â “Irresponsible And Indifferent To The Violent Consequences of His Dangerous Rhetoric”.Â Â Beck and His Enablers Should be Held Accountable–– you see, telling the truth about leftist infiltration causes “violent consequences”.Â (Very much like resisting Islamization, which also causes ‘violent consequences’ for which the infidels are responsible.)
Michael Keegan, president of PFAW, explained Bachmann’s crime: “Michele Bachmann has used her position on the Intelligence Committee to spread baseless conspiracy theories and smear the reputations of honorable public servants. Speaker Boehner himself called her actions ‘dangerous.’ It’s mysterious, then, why he has chosen to reward her reckless extremism with continued access to sensitive national security information and a powerful platform for her agenda.”
Since Boehner has indeed previously thrown Bachmann under the bus, he may be susceptible to this appeal; if he is at all fair-minded, however, he will recognize not only that Bachmann deserves her place on the Intelligence committee, but that she may be more deserving than any of her colleagues of such a place.
For while Bachmann was widely criticized and ridiculed for daring to suggest that Muslim Brotherhood elements had infiltrated the U.S. government, corroboration of her allegations has recently come from an unlikely quarter: Egypt’sÂ Rose El-YoussefÂ magazine, which asserted in a December article that six highly-placed Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators within the Obama Administration had transformed the United States “from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.” (A translation of the article is available from the Investigative ProjectÂ here.)
According to theÂ Investigative Project, “the six named people include:Â Arif Alikhan, assistant secretary of Homeland Security for policy development; Mohammed Elibiary, a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council;Â Rashad Hussain, the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference;Â Salam al-Marayati, co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC); Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); and Eboo Patel, a member of President Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships.”
These represent many of the individuals and groups about whom Bachmann had raised concerns. For example, Bachmann’s letter last summer to the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security stated that Elibiary had “extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood” and “sympathy for Islamist causes,” and accused him of “gain(ing) access to classified documents.”
And indeed, in 2011 investigative journalist Patrick PooleÂ reportedÂ that “Elibiary may have been given access to a sensitive database of state and local intelligence reports, and then allegedly shopped some of those materials to a media outlet.”Â According to Poole, Elibiary approached “a left-leaning media outlet” with reports marked For Official Use Only that he said demonstrated rampant “Islamophobia” in the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS).Â The media outlet declined to do a story, but what was Elibiary doing shopping the Official Use Only documents in the first place?
Poole checked with Steve McCraw, director of the Texas DPS, who “confirmed that Elibiary has access to the Homeland Security State and Local Intelligence Community of Interest (HS SLIC) database, which contains hundreds of thousands of intelligence reports and products that are intended for intelligence sharing between law enforcement agencies.”Â Said McCraw of Elibiary:Â “We know that he has accessed DPS documents and downloaded them.”
There have been questions about Elibiary’s true allegiances for years. He wasÂ one of the speakersÂ at a December 2004 conference in Dallas titled “A Tribute to the Great Islamic Visionary.” The visionary in question was none other than the founding father of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Ayatollah Khomeini.
When I questioned him about his appearance at such a conference, Elibiary claimed that he hadn’t known what kind of conference it was going to be, although he didn’t explain why he went ahead and appeared there anyway once he found out.Â Among those who found this explanation wanting was journalist Rod Dreher of theÂ Dallas Morning News, whose skepticism angered Elibiary. The great moderate subsequently threatened Dreher, telling him:Â “Expect someone to put a banana in your exhaust pipe.”