“Collectively we can send a clear and unambiguous message to the entire gun industry that investors will no longer financially support companies that support gun violence.”
If you don’t think the anti-gun nuts Â want to take away your guns, just have a look at the proposed legislation by Senator Dianne Feinstein here.
Despite the disgrace in the White House, this is still America. In a wide-ranging Fox News poll of 1,000 registered voters, 52% reported having a gun in the home. When asked, “If the government passed a law to take your guns, would you give up your guns or defy the law and keep your guns?” 65% of them said they wouldÂ defy the law. Â (Moonbattery)
Do you really want aÂ civil war, liberals?
Â History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.”
If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…
Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr. has a message for residents: learn how to use a gun.–ReadÂ MoreÂ Â»
Â Yalumba can get stuffed:
After discovering that the NRA was selling four of its wines on the club’s international list, winemaker Yalumba is seeking to detach itself from the NRA,Â Fox News reports.
An unconstitutional act is not law:
Gingrich Schools Gun-Grabbing Piers Morgan: ‘Isn’t Your Real View That You Would Ban Pistols?’
Supreme Court decision, Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) States” All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them” Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 435 p. 442
“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177