If Wilders is wrong, explain this conference

Why are politicians, journalists and Jewish leaders now demonising Geert Wilders for warning against exactly the ideology of Islam as preached by many speakers at this conference?

Why do they pretend Wilders has misrepresented Islam when the very things he describes are preached openly?

If Wilders is wrong, explain this conference

Geert Wilders, the Dutch political leader now on a speaking tour of Australia, has not only had his speeches blockaded by violent demonstrators trying to stop Australians from hearing him.

He has not only been vilified in the media for trying to warn that Islam as an ideology is a menace to Western values and freedoms – from the freedom to speak to even identify as gay.

Depressingly, he has even been shunned by Opposition Leader Tony Abbott and Jewish community leaders. It seems to me that political or community advantage is being put before principle – and fear is preventing a rational discussion of Wilders’ message.

It’s driven Abbott, even Abbott, to misrepresent what Wilders is in fact saying and play blind to the issue he actually raises – which is about the nature of Islam, not its followers:

Mr Abbott said Wilders’ was “substantially” wrong about Islam and the preparedness of Muslims living in Australia to integrate.

“He is entitled to his view but I think that the Muslims in this country see themselves rightly as fair dinkum, dinky-di Australians, just as the Catholics and the Jews and Protestants and the atheists, we see ourselves as Australians,” Mr Abbott told host Neil Mitchell.

This hypocrisy and fear is exposed best by what is misleadingly called a ”Peace Conference and Exhibition” being organised in Melbourne in March.

Read it all. And many thanks to Andrew Bolt for keeping the torch of freedom burning! If Wilders is wrong, explain this conference

If fear and censorship is the price of immigration… (Andrew Bolt)

Islam inspires fear in the West – and that fear turns into censorship.

 The latest example:

The BBC has been accused of ‘extraordinary’ censorship by a leading playwright after dialogue was cut from her hard-hitting drama in case it offended Muslims.

Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti, whose 2004 play Behzti was pulled from a Birmingham theatre after it sparked Sikh protests, says the Corporation tampered with her work because it involved an honour killing.

Ms Bhatti was commissioned by Radio 4 to write an episode of its police drama Stone…

At the centre of her story is the honour killing of a 16-year-old Asian girl, and DCI Stone is told by his bosses to treat the case ‘sensitively’ because she is Muslim.

Although they have admitted removing dialogue from the afternoon drama, the BBC claims they did it to avoid ‘potentially misrepresenting majority British Muslim attitudes to honour killing’.

Describing the play’s final line, Ms Bhatti told a conference …: ‘At the end, a character says: “There is so much pressure in our community to look right and to behave right.” The compliance department came back and said, “We don’t want to suggest the entire Muslim community condones honour killings”.

The BBC’s compliance department has an odd notion that a character in a radio play speaks for the BBC.

20 thoughts on “If Wilders is wrong, explain this conference”

  1. Sadly it seems, those cowardly Jewish groups (and I wonder how representative they really are) are making themselves part of the problem, they need to wake up and smell the jihad.

  2. Anti-semitism in Europe has grown in pace with Muslim immigration. Must be those Right Wing fascists. Muslims — NAH.

  3. Tony et al, are quiet because of the current anti-discrimination laws. According to Tim Wilson of the IPA, Tony and George will transform the debate on human rights because the HRC does not honour its Charter.

  4. …..this upcoming conference makes me feel physically sick, it is a congregation of vile hate-mongers (just listen to Zakir Naik and his vile self congratulatory performances, to get a taste, plenty of it on youtube)….but it heralds worse things to come. I don’t think we are far behind Europe in Islam’s assault on liberal Western thinking. It is already happening here in Australia, just visit Sydney’s West, around Bankstown, Punchbowl, Canterbury. It is frightening, Islam will destroy Western society,and it is not far off.

  5. Hi Sheikyermani

    I like your website, but why don’t you acknowledge your sources?
    This is cut and paste from Andrew Bolt’s blog but you don’t say so.
    I’ve discovered that other of your posts are copied from elsewhere.
    Keep up your blog mate, but let your readers know who their reading.

  6. These are the bloggers all slandered and smeared,
    who use the internet well revered
    who expose the mainstream media lame
    who are keen to avoid any morsel of blame,
    who quote the Cameron tall and strong
    who should have known better all along,
    who echoed the Brown with reverent tone,
    who followed the Blair all covered in spin,
    who copied the Bush
    who was duped by the Lie of the Brotherhood.

  7. I agree with you Johnny, but I do know individual Jews who are awake. Unfortunately, they are a minority. But I am a Catholic and there are too many priests and Catholics, and other Christians, that are just as bad as those Jewish useful idiots. I read somewhere that about 70% of the Jews in the USA voted a 2nd time for ovomit – now, that tells me a lot. And that tells me that Jews might be very bright in many areas but not in history – unless it is whining about the holocaust that they have not learned from.

  8. Re: “the issue he actually raises – which is about the nature of Islam, not its followers” – SORRY, but I can’t ever agree with this, and it’s the ONLY thing about Geert Wilders that bugs me!

    He’s already been threatened and attacked, how can he think he still has to pander to this PC idiocy?!

    It’s EXACTLY like saying:

    “National Socialism is evil, but I’ve nothing against individual nazis!”


    ALL moslems are criminals, whether or not they were innocently born into it, simply because by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.

    And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.

    So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.



    And this absolutely sickening Twitter PR ad campaign of “#MyJihad – where they pretend it’s just a “struggle” is so vile it’s almost beyond words!

    “What’s YOUR Jihad?”


    They coyly ask; translation: “What’s YOUR Crime?”

    Those who worked on this ad to “normalize” hate-crimes shoudl be indicted, arrested, charged convicted and sentenced for being paid & willing accessories & traitors enabling moslem crimes against humanity!


  9. Don’t stutter, don’t equivocate even minimally. Just say “Wilders isn’t wrong” …
    Islam is poison.

  10. True, Unkle Vladdi: Wilders accepts the fallacy of separating Muslims fronm Islam. He ain’t the only one either; Geller & Spencer also do it.

    I think that trying to skirt around the racism meme is part of the problem. Another part is individualism: they know that there is, among the ummah, a range of knowledge & zealotry. They do not want to lump the MINO in with the Believer.

    Wilders can not communicate everything he knows about Islam in a single half hour speech or three minute media interview. Besides which, I am not convinced that he knows as much about it as we do.

  11. Dajjal & Vladdi:

    Its a legal issue.

    You can and will be prosecuted if you accuse Muslims as a group. The law is an ass, but that is how our law works. Islam is an ideology, so you can (still) criticise Islam, but not Muslims, or Negroes, or Chinese, or whatever.

    Wilders has to say that.

  12. Sheik,

    “Muslims” are not a group (as in a “race”) but they all DO belong to a group (“islam”) which happens to be a global crime-syndicate.

    Since membership in crime-gangs is “illegal” shouldn’t pointing out the members of same be a civic duty, and not held to be a “crime” in itself?!

  13. Islam is a satanically inspired ideology hiding behind a thinly veiled religiosity,which does not deserve the status of a religion, bent on world domination via the sword. Even Mohammad once asked his child wife Aisha who was still playing with her dolls if he was demon possessed, to which she replied, oh no Prophet you are so devout.( By deceiving, Satan is at his best ) Jihad has three stages. 1. The Stealth Jihad in which we are now in, and is very dangerous as we don’t know who our enemy is. 2.Defensive Jihad in which we are also in, when the whining begings, want this and want that and want the other, and then play the victim and race card, ( Islam is not a race ) and then use our freedom and our laws against us ect. ect. The other is 3. Offensive Jihad, let the killing begin. As long they are in the minority they lay low until they had time to breed, and then they’ll come out of the wood-works. There is no moderate Islam as the all read from the same book, and their writings and saying are for all time, and if there is indeed such a thing as a moderate Islam, where were they on 9/11. The opposite is true, and tried to build a triumphant Cordoba House over the ashes of 3000 victims of Islam.

  14. The Peace Conference should have at the top of their agenda the eradication of FGM, gender based violence and all human rights violations perpetrated on women in the name of islam. I expect nothing less. Unless, that is, they somehow think women are not really deserving of, or included in, their message of ‘peace’.

Comments are closed.