Saudi-sponsored “interfaith dialogue” is about silencing the truth, toÂ pressuring the West to show tolerance to Muslims by not criticizing them for persecuting others, which would be portrayed as “Islamophobia.”
“Islamophobia”, that we all know by now, is the most heinous crime against humanity (only muslims are human, of course) and criticising Muhammad, Â the profit of Islam, must be punished.
330 years ago John Sobiesky beat the soldiers of allah back from the gates of Vienna. By the looks of it, we are now going to lose our birthright without a single bullet being fired.
Soddy Barbaria’s Interfaith Hypocrisy
Saudi King Abudullah with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon at the launching of the King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz International Center for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue in Vienna, Austria. (Photo: Reuters)
What does one make of the gross contradictions that emerge when a human-rights violating nation calls for “dialogue,” even as it enforces religious intolerance on its own turf?
In principle, it is a decent thing: Christians, Jews, Muslims and others trying to reach a common ground and professing mutual respect. Enter Saudi Arabia.Â Birthplace of Islam, the Arabian kingdom is also the one Muslim nation that regularly sponsors interfaith initiatives in the Westâ€”even as its official policy back home is to demonize and persecute the very faiths it claims to want to have an interfaith dialogue with.
Back in 2008, for example, in what was deemed an unprecedented move, Saudi King Abdullah “made an impassioned plea for dialogue among Muslims, Christians and Jews,” going so far as to refer to the latter two as “our brothers.” His stated goal was to develop “respect among religions.”
The Saudi monarch’sÂ most recent initiativeÂ reached fruition recently, on November 26, 2012, when the King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz International Center for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue was launched in the Austrian capital, Vienna.
According to its own website, the center “was founded to enable, empower and encourage dialogue among followers of different religions and cultures around the world.” Lending international legitimacy to this Saudi gesture of goodwill, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was among those who attended the opening.
While all this ostensibly sounds well and good, consider the many incongruities, the many absurditiesâ€”initially demonstrated by the simple fact that Saudi Sheikh Abdul Rahman al-Sudais, who was quoted praising the Austrian-based center as proof that “Islam is a religion of dialogue and understanding and not a religion of enmity, fanaticism, and violence,” is also on record calling Jews “monkeys and pigs” and Christians “cross worshippers.”
Nor is he just a run-of-the-mill sheikh: He is theÂ government-appointedÂ imam of Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mosque in Meccaâ€”Islam’s holiest site, where Christians, Jews and others are routinelyÂ condemned and cursedÂ during the prayers of the faithful.
But this is not surprising. Even the State Department’s most recent internal religious freedom report on Saudi Arabia notes that “freedom of religion is neither recognized nor protected under the law and is severely restricted in practice.Â The public practice of any religion other than Islam is prohibited, and there is no separation between state and religion.”
And this is the key point: Saudi Arabia’s brand of religious intolerance is not a product of the “Arab street,” terrorists or mob violence.Â Â It is institutionalized; it is enforced by the state itself.Â In other words, religious intolerance is being enforced by the very people who claim to want to have dialogue with Christians and Jews under the umbrella of “tolerance” and “mutual respect.”
In this context, what, exactly, do they wish to talk about?
Do they wish to talk about how the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabiaâ€”yet another top-ranked Saudi religious officialâ€”declared that it is “necessary to destroy all the churches of the region,” basing his verdict on the commands of Muslim prophet Mohammad?
Do they wish to talk about how, despite promising to reform their school textbooks, theÂ Saudi education system continues toÂ indoctrinate Muslim childrenÂ with hatred and incitement, teaching that “Christians are the enemies of the Believers” and that the “the Apes are the people of the Sabbath, the Jews; and the Swine are the infidels of the communion of Jesus, the Christians”? Little wonder the imam of Mecca’s Grand Mosque uses such monikersâ€”even as he gushes about the Saudi-sponsored Vienna-based initiative for “dialogue.”
Maybe they wish to talk about the 28-year-old Saudi woman, Maryan, who, after converting to Christianity, had to flee the nation, and is reportedly currently hiding in Sweden, even as authorities try to extradite her back to Saudi Arabia to faceÂ the crime of apostasy, which calls for the death penalty?Â Earlier Maryam had said that, though she “was raised to hate Judaism and Christianity she has come to love those religions since finding peace in Christianity.”
Do they wish to talk about how 35 Christian Ethiopians were arrested and abused for almost a year simply for holding a private house prayer?Â Upon release, one of the Christians observed that, “The Saudi officials do not tolerate any religions other than Islam. They consider non-Muslims unbelievers.Â They are full of hatred towards non-Muslims.”
Or do they wish to talk about how last December 2012, Saudi “religious police” stormed a house in the province of al-Jouf, detaining more than 41 guests for, in the words of the police statement, “plotting to celebrate Christmas”?
Of course, the Vienna-based King Abdullah International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue does not wish to talk about any of these instances of state-enforced religious intolerance. Instead, the purpose of the center’s existence is to deflect criticism from Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries, and direct it onto the West.
This was amply demonstrated during the center’s inaugural symposium, when Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the head of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, urged Western governments to enact laws countering “Islamophobia,” because it “leads to hate crimes and as such, it generates fear, feelings of stigmatization, marginalization, alienation and rejection.”
In other words, Saudi-sponsored “interfaith dialogue” is about silencing the truthâ€”pressuring the West to show tolerance to Muslims by not criticizing them for persecuting others, which would be portrayed as “Islamophobia.”
It still remains to be determined which is more surreal, more unbelievable: That Saudi Arabia, which tops the charts of state-enforced religious intolerance, is sponsoring “religious dialogue,” or that the West, including leaders of those religions whose adherents are daily persecuted by Saudi and Muslim intolerance, are going along with the gagâ€”and all of them with a straight face.