How dare Australians balk at “legal pluralism to accommodate” shariah?

Submit, submit, submit!

A parliamentary committee warns that mistrusting Muslims or multiculturalism will never lead to a stronger, richer or safer community.


How dare Australians oppose sharia?

How dare they believe their eyes and ears?

How dare they balk at “legal pluralism to accommodate” shariah?

Those who oppose Islam cause wars and are responsible for them..

At its core, Islam is a religious mission to all humanity. Muslims are religiously obliged to disseminate the Islamic faith throughout the world.   ”We have sent you forth to all mankind” (Q. 34:28). If non-Muslims submit to conversion or subjugation, this call (dawa) can be pursued peacefully. If they do not, Muslims are obliged to wage war against them. In Islam, peace requires that non-Muslims submit to the call of Islam, either by converting or by accepting the status of a religious minority (dhimmi) and paying the imposed poll tax, jizya.

Fitzgerald’s Prayer

Stop, for god’s sake stop, importing trouble—and Muslim immigrants, as a whole, necessarily mean trouble, in all lands where the political and legal institutions, and social arrangements, are flatly contradicted by the Shari’a. Muslims are obligated to change or tear down those institutions, in order to remove all “obstacles to Islam.” It is not special or individual malice that prompts that attitude. That is their duty, a central duty. Why not come to fully and soberly understand that duty, and out of a minimal sense of self-preservation, cease to import those into our lands (America, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and every other place that has so generously admitted, under a twisted definitiion of “refugees,” people who do not, and can not, wish our ways or institutions or constitutions well.

Hugh Fitzgerald

One thought on “How dare Australians balk at “legal pluralism to accommodate” shariah?”

  1. Sharia, exactly like islam itself, (because it is really only an elaboration on the immoral double-standard strictures of the Qur’an,) is all about false “ETHICS,” and so is opposed to true MORALITY: it lists the who, what, when, where, why, and how they WILL break that one Golden Rule of Law which defines all situational morality! THEY ONLY REALLY EVER THEREBY CONDONE ILLEGALITY “WITH CONDITIONS!”


Comments are closed.